Breast-conserving surgery associated with adjuvant radiotherapy is the state of the art in the surgical treatment of breast cancer. Oncoplastic surgery through dermo-adipose flaps based in perforating arteries (muscle sparing flaps) for partial reconstruction is increasingly used as a good option for avoiding musculocutaneous flaps. In this study we evaluate the outcomes of the use of chest wall perforator flaps in the replacement of partial breast volume. A prospective cohort study of female patients that underwent a conservative oncoplastic surgery procedure with partial breast reconstruction using a dermo-adipose flap of perforating arteries of the chest wall was conducted between November 2020 and March 2022 at our centre. Primary outcomes were surgical morbidity, positive margins and reoperation rates. Characteristics associated with the occurrence of complications were further identified. Forty-five patients underwent the procedure of interest during the study period. The mean age was 55 years. The median larger dimension of the tumor was 23 mm. Lateral intercostal artery perforator (LICAP), lateral thoracic artery perforator (LTAP), a combined flap and Anterior Intercostal Artery Perforator/Medial Intercostal Artery Perforator (AICAP)/(MICAP) were performed in 22, 16, 2 and 5 patients, respectively. The mean operative time was 126 min. A total of 9 (20.0%) patients required a reoperation after definitive diagnosis, 4 due to positive margins and 5 due to immediate/early surgical morbidity. Local perforator flaps in oncoplastic breast-conserving surgery are a good option for immediate reconstruction after conservative surgery, showing low morbidity and favourable outcomes.
In order to assess the risk of non-sentinel node involvement in breast cancer patients, some prediction tools have been developed and tested. However, a wide range of results are observed. We tested a simplified clinical decision rule, against the complex nomogram created from the MSKCC sentinel node database. Two single institutional consecutive series of patients with a positive SN, submitted to SN biopsy plus axillary dissection from June 1999 to October 2007, were evaluated. A receiver operating curve was drawn and the area under the curve was calculated as well as the negative predictive value for both tests, assuming discriminative values of 10 and 15%. Considering the derivation series, our results showed an area under the curve of 0.69 for both our clinical decision rule and the MSKCC nomogram. The analysis of the validation series showed an area under the curve of 0.65 for our clinical decision rule and of 0.67 for the MSKCC nomogram. The nomogram results are inferior to those found in the original population and are similar to our clinical decision rule results. Individual centres should develop and prospectively test their own clinical decision rules, based on their institutional Sentinel Node data.