Fibromyalgia syndrome is mainly characterized by pain, fatigue, and sleep disruption. The etiology of fibromyalgia is still unclear: if central sensitization is considered to be the main mechanism involved, then many other factors, genetic, immunological, and hormonal, may play an important role. The diagnosis is typically clinical (there are no laboratory abnormalities) and the physician must concentrate on pain and on its features. Additional symptoms (e.g., Raynaud’s phenomenon, irritable bowel disease, and heat and cold intolerance) can be associated with this condition. A careful differential diagnosis is mandatory: fibromyalgia is not a diagnosis of exclusion. Since 1990, diagnosis has been principally based on the two major diagnostic criteria defined by the ACR. Recently, new criteria have been proposed. The main goals of the treatment are to alleviate pain, increase restorative sleep, and improve physical function. A multidisciplinary approach is optimal. While most nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and opioids have limited benefit, an important role is played by antidepressants and neuromodulating antiepileptics: currently duloxetine (NNT for a 30% pain reduction 7.2), milnacipran (NNT 19), and pregabalin (NNT 8.6) are the only drugs approved by the US Food and Drug Administration for the treatment of fibromyalgia. In addition, nonpharmacological treatments should be associated with drug therapy.
21 January 2014 in The American Journal of Sports Medicine
Background: Medial opening wedge high tibial osteotomy (OWHTO) is a widely accepted procedure for the treatment of medial compartment arthritis of the knee. Compared with closing wedge HTO, however, the outcomes of OWHTO reported in the literature are incomplete. Purpose: To identify the positive and negative prognostic factors related to the outcomes of OWHTO through an evaluation of midterm study results and survivorship analysis. Study Design: Case series; Level of evidence, 4. Methods: From January 2001 to December 2009, a total of 141 consecutive OWHTOs were performed in 123 patients. Only patients with symptomatic medial knee overload/arthritis were included. The patients were evaluated preoperatively and at every follow-up visit with (1) the Knee Society score, (2) the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) score, (3) another self-evaluation scale, (4) long-leg radiographs, and (5) plain radiographs. Preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative variables were investigated to find an association with the outcomes. Results: Of the 123 patients, 15 were lost to follow-up, and 24 were excluded from the study, leaving 84 patients (99 OWHTOs) for the present study. The mean age of the patients at the time of surgery was 54.5 ± 9.2 years. The mean follow-up was 51.5 ± 23.8 months. The Knee Society and WOMAC scores significantly improved after surgery ( P < .001). The variables significantly related to a poor outcome were (1) age >56 years ( P = .008) and (2) postoperative knee flexion <120° ( P < .001); the variables significantly related to a good outcome were (1) Ahlbäck grade 0 arthritis of the medial compartment ( P < .001) and (2) excellent preoperative Knee Society score ( P < .001). The Kaplan-Meier analysis showed a survival rate of 98.7% at 5 years and 75.9% at 7.5 years. Conclusion: With correct indications, OWHTO is a reliable procedure for medial knee arthritis/overload. The outcomes reported are similar to those from other studies, although the variables related to outcomes are slightly different.
The convincing background of the recent studies, investigating the different potentials of platelet-rich plasma, offers the clinician an appealing alternative for the treatment of cartilage lesions and osteoarthritis. Recent evidences in literature have shown that PRP may be helpful both as an adjuvant for surgical treatment of cartilage defects and as a therapeutic tool by intra-articular injection in patients affected by osteoarthritis. In this review, the authors introduce the trophic and anti-inflammatory properties of PRP and the different products of the available platelet concentrates. Then, in a complex scenario made of a great number of clinical variables, they resume the current literature on the PRP applications in cartilage surgery as well as the use of intra-articular PRP injections for the conservative treatment of cartilage degenerative lesions and osteoarthritis in humans, available as both case series and comparative studies. The result of this review confirms the fascinating biological role of PRP, although many aspects yet remain to be clarified and the use of PRP in a clinical setting has to be considered still exploratory.
21 February 2012 in Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy