José-Ángel Hernández-Rivas

Dr. José-Ángel Hernández-Rivas

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

33Years (1994-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
3 September 2020 in Blood
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
AMAnthony Mato
Anthony Mato
LRLindsey Roeker
Lindsey Roeker
NLNicole Lamanna
Nicole Lamanna
JAJohn Allan
John Allan
LLLori Leslie
Lori Leslie
TEToby Eyre
Toby Eyre
Given advanced age, comorbidities, and immune dysfunction, chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) patients may be at particularly high risk of infection and poor outcomes related to coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). Robust analysis of outcomes for CLL patients, particularly examining effects of baseline characteristics and CLL-directed therapy, is critical to optimally manage CLL patients through this evolving pandemic. CLL patients diagnosed with symptomatic COVID-19 across 43 international centers (n = 198) were included. Hospital admission occurred in 90%. Median age at COVID-19 diagnosis was 70.5 years. Median Cumulative Illness Rating Scale score was 8 (range, 4-32). Thirty-nine percent were treatment naive (“watch and wait”), while 61% had received ≥1 CLL-directed therapy (median, 2; range, 1-8). Ninety patients (45%) were receiving active CLL therapy at COVID-19 diagnosis, most commonly Bruton tyrosine kinase inhibitors (BTKi’s; n = 68/90 [76%]). At a median follow-up of 16 days, the overall case fatality rate was 33%, though 25% remain admitted. Watch-and-wait and treated cohorts had similar rates of admission (89% vs 90%), intensive care unit admission (35% vs 36%), intubation (33% vs 25%), and mortality (37% vs 32%). CLL-directed treatment with BTKi’s at COVID-19 diagnosis did not impact survival (case fatality rate, 34% vs 35%), though the BTKi was held during the COVID-19 course for most patients. These data suggest that the subgroup of CLL patients admitted with COVID-19, regardless of disease phase or treatment status, are at high risk of death. Future epidemiologic studies are needed to assess severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 infection risk, these data should be validated independently, and randomized studies of BTKi’s in COVID-19 are needed to provide definitive evidence of benefit.

9 July 2020 in Leukemia
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
LSLydia Scarfò
Lydia Scarfò
TCThomas Chatzikonstantinou
Thomas Chatzikonstantinou
GRGian Matteo Rigolin
Gian Matteo Rigolin
GQGiulia Quaresmini
Giulia Quaresmini
MMMarina Motta
Marina Motta
PGPaolo Prospero Ghia
Paolo Prospero Ghia

20 December 2001 in British Journal of Haematology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
Ramon Garcia-SanzRamon Garcia-Sanz
Ramon Garcia-Sanz
SMSilvia Montoto
Silvia Montoto
ATAgustín Torrequebrada
Agustín Torrequebrada
ACAlfonso García De Coca
Alfonso García De Coca
JPJosé Petit
José Petit
RARamón
Ramón

15 November 2018 in Haematologica
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
SRSimon Rule
Simon Rule
MDMartin Dreyling
Martin Dreyling
AGAndre Goy
Andre Goy
GHGeorg Hess
Georg Hess
RARebecca Auer
Rebecca Auer
MWMichael Wang
Michael Wang

17 November 2014 in American Journal of Hematology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Tomás José González-LópezTomás José González-López
Tomás José González-López
CPCristina Pascual
Cristina Pascual
MÁMaría Teresa Álvarez‐Román
María Teresa Álvarez‐Román
FFFernando Fernández‐Fuertes
Fernando Fernández‐Fuertes
BSBlanca Sánchez‐González
Blanca Sánchez‐González
JGJosé Ramón González‐Porras
José Ramón González‐Porras
Eltrombopag is effective and safe in immune thrombocytopenia (ITP). Some patients may sustain their platelet response when treatment is withdrawn but the frequency of this phenomenon is unknown. We retrospectively evaluated 260 adult primary ITP patients (165 women and 95 men; median age, 62 years) treated with eltrombopag after a median time from diagnosis of 24 months. Among the 201 patients who achieved a complete remission (platelet count >100 × 109/l), eltrombopag was discontinued in 80 patients. Reasons for eltrombopag discontinuation were: persistent response despite a reduction in dose over time (n = 33), platelet count >400 × 109/l (n = 29), patient's request (n = 5), elevated aspartate aminotransferase (n = 3), diarrhea (n = 3), thrombosis (n = 3), and other reasons (n = 4). Of the 49 evaluable patients, 26 patients showed sustained response after discontinuing eltrombopag without additional ITP therapy, with a median follow‐up of 9 (range, 6–25) months. These patients were characterized by a median time since ITP diagnosis of 46.5 months, with 4/26 having ITP < 1 year. Eleven patients were male and their median age was 59 years. They received a median of 4 previous treatment lines and 42% were splenectomized. No predictive factors of sustained response after eltrombopag withdrawal were identified. Platelet response following eltrombopag cessation may be sustained in an important percentage of adult primary ITP patients who achieved CR with eltrombopag. However, reliable markers for predicting which patients will have this response are needed. Am. J. Hematol. 90:E40–E43, 2015.

22 September 2022 in Blood
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Livio PaganoLivio Pagano
Livio Pagano
JSJon Salmanton-García
Jon Salmanton-García
FMFrancesco Marchesi
Francesco Marchesi
OBOLA BLENNOW
OLA BLENNOW
MSMaria Gomes da Silva
Maria Gomes da Silva
OCOliver A. Cornely
Oliver A. Cornely
Limited data are available on breakthrough COVID-19 in patients with hematologic malignancy (HM) after anti–severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) vaccination. Adult patients with HM, ≥1 dose of anti-SARS-CoV-2 vaccine, and breakthrough COVID-19 between January 2021 and March 2022 were analyzed. A total of 1548 cases were included, mainly lymphoid malignancies (1181 cases, 76%). After viral sequencing in 753 cases (49%), the Omicron variant was prevalent (517, 68.7%). Most of the patients received ≤2 vaccine doses before COVID-19 (1419, 91%), mostly mRNA-based (1377, 89%). Overall, 906 patients (59%) received COVID-19-specific treatment. After 30-day follow-up from COVID-19 diagnosis, 143 patients (9%) died. The mortality rate in patients with the Omicron variant was 7.9%, comparable to other variants, with a significantly lower 30-day mortality rate than in the prevaccine era (31%). In the univariable analysis, older age (P < .001), active HM (P < .001), and severe and critical COVID-19 (P = .007 and P < .001, respectively) were associated with mortality. Conversely, patients receiving monoclonal antibodies, even for severe or critical COVID-19, had a lower mortality rate (P < .001). In the multivariable model, older age, active disease, critical COVID-19, and 2-3 comorbidities were correlated with a higher mortality, whereas monoclonal antibody administration, alone (P < .001) or combined with antivirals (P = .009), was protective. Although mortality is significantly lower than in the prevaccination era, breakthrough COVID-19 in HM is still associated with considerable mortality. Death rate was lower in patients who received monoclonal antibodies, alone or in combination with antivirals.