The outbreak of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) has caused mental problems among the public and medical staff in China, especially for children and adolescents, a vulnerable group that might present with more mental problems. It seems that there is a rapid growth in the mental problems (such as depression or anxiety) of Chinese children and adolescents during the outbreak of COVID-19. Although several studies reported the prevalence of depression or anxiety problems for children and adolescents, the results are different across different age groups and sex groups. Moreover, the sample size of these studies was small. In the present study, we aim to perform a meta-analysis to identify the confirmed prevalence of depression and anxiety problems for Chinese children and adolescents during home confinement. Five databases were searched including PubMed, Web of Science, PsycINFO, Google Scholar, and the China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), and both inclusion and exclusion criteria were developed. Finally, a total of 12 studies were included in this meta-analysis. The protocol of this systematic review was registered with INPLASY (protocol ID: INPLASY202150032). It found that the pooled prevalence of mental problems was 28% (95% confidence interval, CI: 0.22–0.34), and the depression and anxiety problem for children and adolescents in China was 22% (95% CI: 0.16–0.30) and 25% (95% CI: 0.20–0.32) based on a random effect model, separately. Subgroup analysis was used to identify that there are no differences between different age groups (primary and middle school vs. high school) (p = 0.26). Meta-regression analysis was performed and the results showed that the moderator of boy percentage was a significant factor (p = 0.04). It indicated that there was an increasing number of children and adolescents with mental problems during the home confinement. It suggested that we should pay more attention to this vulnerable population during a public health crisis in the future, especially for the girls groups, and more detailed implements for mental health management were needed and should be prepared.Systematic Review: The protocol of this systematic review was registered with INPLASY. The protocol ID was INPLASY202150032

Background: To the best of our knowledge, although the Chinese version of the Yale Global Tic Severity Scale (YGTSS) is widely used in child psychiatry departments in China, there is very little evidence focusing on the psychometric characteristics of the Chinese version of YGTSS. In this present study, we aim to re-examine the structure of the Chinese version of YGTSS and investigate its reliability and validity. Methods: A total of 367 children and adolescents with tic disorders aged 5–16 years old participated in the study. The Cronbach’s alpha, test-retest reliability and concurrent validity will be calculated. Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA) also will be performed to assess the structure of YGTSS. Results: The Cronbach’s alpha of the motor tic subscale of YGTSS was 0.84, for the phonic tic subscale of YGTSS, it was 0.90, but for the whole scale, it was 0.58. The test-retest reliability of YGTSS was 0.84. For the results of CFA, the Comparative Fit Index (CFI) of YGTSS based on the Two-Factor Model and Three-Factor Model was 0.97 and 0.96 respectively. The measurement invariance analysis suggested that the Two-Factor model of YGTSS across different age and sex groups was at the accepted level (≥0.90). Conclusion: Overall, according to the results of this research, it suggested that the Chinese version of YGTSS showed good psychometric properties. It can be used in the assessment of tic disorders in the Chinese population. In the future, more comprehensive tools for assessing tics need to be further developed, which can cover the symptoms of premonitory urge and tic related obsessive-compulsive symptoms.

Objective: The outcome of pediatric obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) is still unclear. In the present study, long-term rates and predictors of remission were used to identify potential factors influencing the outcome of pediatric OCD. Methods: Using meta-analysis techniques, we calculated the pooled rate of remission and performed subgroup analyses to identify potential heterogeneities, and the meta-regression analysis was used as a predictor. Results: A total of 18 studies including 1389 participants were identified, and the follow-up periods ranged from 1 to 16 years. The pooled remission rate of pediatric OCD was 62% (95% confidence interval: 52–72). Shorter duration of OCD at baseline ( R ² = 78.04%, p < 0.0001) predicted higher rates of remission. Conclusions: The outcome of pediatric OCD seems to be better than the past. Shorter duration of illness appears to be related to a better outcome. Early detection of pediatric OCD and early intervention play an important role in good prognosis. In the future, studies based on multicenter, longer follow-up studies with larger samples were needed to confirm these issues for the outcome of pediatric OCD.