Khrisha Alphonsus

Dr. Khrisha Alphonsus


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

8Years (2019-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 April 2019 in Complementary Therapies in Medicine
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
KAKhrisha Alphonsus
Khrisha Alphonsus
YSYingying Su
Yingying Su
CDCarl D’aRcy
Carl D’aRcy

7 December 2021 in Vaccines
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Candy Quinta OchiengCandy Quinta Ochieng
Candy Quinta Ochieng
SASabrita Anand
Sabrita Anand
George Kiremu MutwiriGeorge Kiremu Mutwiri
George Kiremu Mutwiri
MSMichael Szafron
Michael Szafron
KAKhrisha Alphonsus
Khrisha Alphonsus
Vaccine hesitancy is one of the top ten greatest threats to global health. During the COVID-19 era, vaccine hesitancy poses substantial risks, especially in visible minorities, who are disproportionately affected by the pandemic. Although evidence of vaccine hesitancy exists, there is minimal focus on visible minorities and the reasons for hesitancy in this group are unclear. Identifying these populations and their reasons for vaccine hesitancy is crucial in improving vaccine uptake and curbing the spread of COVID-19. This scoping review follows a modified version of the Arksey and O’Malley strategy. Using comprehensive search strategies, advanced searches were conducted on Medline, CINAHL, and PubMed databases to acquire relevant articles. Full-text reviews using inclusion and exclusion criteria were performed to extract themes of vaccine hesitancy. Themes were grouped into factors using thematic qualitative analysis and were objectively confirmed by principal component analysis (PCA). To complement both analyses, a word cloud of titles and abstracts for the final articles was generated. This study included 71 articles. Themes were grouped into 8 factors and the top 3 recurring factors were safety and effectiveness of the vaccine, mistrust, and socioeconomic characteristics. Shedding light on these factors could help mitigate health inequities and increase overall vaccine uptake worldwide through interventions and policies targeted at these factors. Ultimately, this would help achieve global herd immunity.

7 March 2020 in BMC Research Notes
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
AAAdiba Ashrafi
Adiba Ashrafi
CFCindy Feng
Cindy Feng
CNCory Neudorf
Cory Neudorf
KAKhrisha Alphonsus
Khrisha Alphonsus
Objective: Bullying victimization among adolescents has been well-recognized as a behavior associated with adverse psychological and mental health outcomes. Most studies on bullying victimization have focused on adolescents, but research is sparse regarding school victimization among preadolescents before they transition to adolescence. This study sought to identify latent classes of different types of co-occurring bullying victimization, based on a sample of 3829 school students in grades 5–8, ages 9–14 in the year of 2011 from the Saskatoon Health Region, Saskatchewan, Canada. Results: Using a latent class analysis approach, the results uncovered three groups of victimized students, including those who were aggressively victimized (7.2%), moderately victimized (34.6%) and non-victimized (58.2%). Younger age and being overweight was associated with a higher likelihood of bullying victimization. Moderately and aggressively victimized students had greater probabilities of feeling like an outsider, experiencing anxiety, depressed moods, engaging in suicidal ideation and drinking when compared to non-victimized students. Peer and parent supports had significant protective effects against being victimized. Given the negative consequences of recurrent victimization among the preadolescents, it is imperative to address bullying incidents as they occur to prevent repeated transgressions, especially for those who suffer from multiple types of victimization.

1 January 2021 in Journal of Evidence-Based Integrative Medicine
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
KAKhrisha Alphonsus
Khrisha Alphonsus
CDCarl D’arcy
Carl D’arcy
Context.: Pain is one of the most common symptoms reported by patients living with Multiple Sclerosis (MS). Risk factors associated with pain may include individual’s cognitive thinking process, emotional and behavioural response to pain and amount of social support. There is a lack of research on the influence on the amount of social support and its association to pain outcomes. Objective.: The primary objective of this study was to determine the association between amount and of social support and its association with odds of pain among individuals with MS. Methods.: The Survey on Living with Neurological Conditions in Canada (SLNCC) 2011-2012 linked to the Canadian Community Health Survey (CCHS) 2010-2011 was used to carry out a logistic regression model for this analysis (N = 78,623). Main outcome measures.: The factors that were assessed were psychological factors, problems with sleeping, self-perceived general health, self-perceived level of stress, number of years living with MS, as well as social factors. The outcome variable was pain. Results.: The amount of social support was found to be significant in that individuals who had 3 or fewer types of social support were 3.02 times more likely (95% CI 1.06 to 8.59) to report being in pain as opposed to individuals who had 4 types of support. The results indicate the importance of self efficacy in overcoming symptoms of MS and the need for more home care services.

21 March 2022 in Journal of Substance Use
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
FAFrancis Abayateye
Francis Abayateye
BFBarb Fornssler
Barb Fornssler
CFCindy Feng
Cindy Feng
CDCarl D’aRcy
Carl D’aRcy
KAKhrisha Alphonsus
Khrisha Alphonsus
Generally, substance misuse is associated with young people, however there is a growing concern on the rates of prescription drug misuse among older adults. This review aims to assess the extent of...

11 November 2022 in BMC Public Health
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
KAKhrisha Alphonsus
Khrisha Alphonsus
FAF. Abayateye
F. Abayateye
Background: The COVID-19 pandemic that has resulted in social distancing, lockdowns, and increase in media posts has taken a toll on the mental health of many people especially those living with Generalized Anxiety Disorder (GAD). The main objective of this study is to understand whether the source of information people use to receive information about COVID-19 and increase or decrease in personal weekly habits during the pandemic were associated with severity of GAD. Methods: This study was a cross sectional design and was based on data from Canada. The Canadian Perspective Survey Series (CPSS) 4, 2020: Information Sourced Consulted During the Pandemic was used for the study. The outcome variable was severity of GAD. Multivariate logistic regression was carried out using STATA IC 13. Results: Severity of GAD was significantly associated with being a female, the type of information source used to find out about COVID-19 and change in weekly habits (consuming alcohol, consuming cannabis spending time on the internet and eating junk foods or sweets). Conclusion: The results indicate that getting information from credible sources about the pandemic, staying connected with family and friends, seeking virtual mental health services, and learning positive coping strategies can help reduce the severity of GAD.