Brian I Shaw

Dr. Brian I Shaw

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

9Years (2018-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
14 November 2020 in Cancers
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Dimitrios MorisDimitrios Moris
Dimitrios Moris
BSBrian I Shaw
Brian I Shaw
LMLisa McElroy
Lisa McElroy
ABAndrew S. Barbas
Andrew S. Barbas
Liver transplantation (LT) remains a mainstay of treatment for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Tumor factors such as size and number of tumors define eligibility for LT using the Milan criteria. The tumor burden score (TBS) incorporates both tumor number and size into a single continuous variable and has been used to differentiate prognosis among patients undergoing resection for HCC. The objective of the present study was to evaluate the ability of the TBS to predict overall and recurrence-free survival in patients undergoing LT for HCC. The Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients (SRTR) was used to analyze all liver transplants for HCC, with initial tumor size data from 2004 to 2018. There were 12,486 patients in the study period. In the unadjusted analyses, patients with a high TBS had worse overall (p < 0.0001) and recurrence-free (p < 0.0001) survival. In the adjusted analyses, a high TBS was associated with a greater hazard ratio (HR) of death (HR = 1.21; 95%CI, [1.13–1.30]; p < 0.001) and recurrence (HR = 1.49; 95%CI [1.3–1.7]; p < 0.001). When we superimposed the TBS on the Milan criteria, we saw that a higher TBS was associated with a higher hazard of recurrence at values that were either all within (HR = 1.20; 95%CI, [1.04–1.37]; p = 0.011) or variably within (HR = 1.53; 95%CI, [1.16–2.01]; p = 0.002) the Milan criteria. In conclusion, the TBS is a promising tool in predicting outcomes in patients with HCC after LT.

14 July 2021 in Liver Transplantation
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
MSMariya L. Samoylova
Mariya L. Samoylova
KWKara Wegermann
Kara Wegermann
BSBrian I Shaw
Brian I Shaw
SKSamuel J. Kesseli
Samuel J. Kesseli
SASandra Au
Sandra Au
LMLisa M. McElroy
Lisa M. McElroy

4 June 2020 in Journal of the American Society of Nephrology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
BSBrian I Shaw
Brian I Shaw
DSDebra L. Sudan
Debra L. Sudan
LBL. Ebony Boulware
L. Ebony Boulware
LMLisa M. McElroy
Lisa M. McElroy

9 February 2021 in American Journal of Transplantation
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
BSBrian I Shaw
Brian I Shaw
MSMariya L. Samoylova
Mariya L. Samoylova
SSScott Sanoff
Scott Sanoff
ABAndrew S. Barbas
Andrew S. Barbas
DSDebra L. Sudan
Debra L. Sudan
LMLisa M. McElroy
Lisa M. McElroy
The incidence of simultaneous heart-kidney transplant (SHK) has increased markedly in the last 15 years. There are no universally agreed upon indications for SHK vs. heart alone (HA) transplant, and center evaluation processes vary widely. We utilized Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients data from 2003 to 2017 to quantify changes in the practice of SHK, examine the survival of SHK vs. HA, and identify patients with marginal benefit from SHK. We used Kaplan-Meier curves and Cox proportional hazards to assess differences in survival. The incidence of SHK increased more than fourfold between 2003 and 2017 from 1.6% to 6.6% of total hearts transplanted, while the proportion of dialysis-dependent patients undergoing SHK has remained constant. SHK was associated with increased survival in dialysis-dependent patients (Median Survival SHK: 12.6 vs. HA: 7.1 years p < .0001) but not with nondialysis-dependent patients (Median Survival SHK: 12.5 vs. HA 12.3, p = .24). The marginal effect of SHK in decreasing the hazard of death diminished with increasing eGFR. Delayed graft function occurred in 26% of SHK recipients. Posttransplant chronic dialysis was similar for both operations (6.4% of HA and 6.0% of SHK). Further study is needed to define patients who benefit from SHK.

29 April 2020 in Transplant International
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
DMDimitrios Moris
Dimitrios Moris
BSBrian I Shaw
Brian I Shaw
NDNikolaos Dimitrokallis
Nikolaos Dimitrokallis
ABAndrew S. Barbas
Andrew S. Barbas
Coronavirus 2 (SARS‐CoV‐2) is the cause of an ongoing pandemic of respiratory illness, known as coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID‐19).[1] The risk of developing COVID‐19 from a SARS‐CoV‐2 infected organ donor is unknown. Therefore, extreme caution is necessary when considering transplantation. Transmission is affected by epidemiological risk factors, incubation period, degree of viraemia, and viability of SARS‐CoV‐2 in blood and organ compartments. Recent guidelines from NHSBT[2] recommend that all potential donors be tested for SARS‐CoV‐2 and donation suspended from those who test positive. Donation is discouraged for asymptomatic individuals who have been in a COVID‐19‐affected area in the last 28 days.

12 June 2024 in Science Translational Medicine
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
MMMiriam Manook
Miriam Manook
DODanae Olaso
Danae Olaso
IAImran Anwar
Imran Anwar
IDIsabel DeLaura
Isabel DeLaura
JYJanghoon Yoon
Janghoon Yoon
JKJean Kwun
Jean Kwun
Genetic modification of porcine donors, combined with optimized immunosuppression, has been shown to improve outcomes of experimental xenotransplant. However, little is known about outcomes in sensitized recipients, a population that could potentially benefit the most from the clinical implementation of xenotransplantation. Here, five highly allosensitized rhesus macaques received a porcine kidney from GGTA1 (α1,3-galactosyltransferase) knockout pigs expressing the human CD55 transgene (1KO.1TG) and were maintained on an anti-CD154 monoclonal antibody (mAb)–based immunosuppressive regimen. These recipients developed de novo xenoreactive antibodies and experienced xenograft rejection with evidence of thrombotic microangiopathy and antibody-mediated rejection (AMR). In comparison, three highly allosensitized rhesus macaques receiving a kidney from GGTA1 , CMAH (cytidine monophospho- N -acetylneuraminic acid hydroxylase), and b4GNT2 / b4GALNT2 (β-1,4- N -acetyl-galactosaminyltransferase 2) knockout pigs expressing seven human transgenes including human CD46 , CD55 , CD47 , THBD (thrombomodulin), PROCR (protein C receptor), TNFAIP3 (tumor necrosis factor–α–induced protein 3), and HMOX1 (heme oxygenase 1) (3KO.7TG) experienced significantly prolonged graft survival and reduced AMR, associated with dampened post-transplant humoral responses, early monocyte and neutrophil activation, and T cell repopulation. After withdrawal of all immunosuppression, recipients who received kidneys from 3KO.7TG pigs rejected the xenografts via AMR. These data suggest that allosensitized recipients may be suitable candidates for xenografts from genetically modified porcine donors and could benefit from an optimized immunosuppression regimen designed to target the post-transplant humoral response, thereby avoiding AMR.