Benedict I Truman

Dr. Benedict I Truman

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

27Years (2000-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 January 2000 in American Journal of Preventive Medicine
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
BTBenedict I Truman
Benedict I Truman
CSC.KAy Smith-Akin
C.KAy Smith-Akin
AHAlan R Hinman
Alan R Hinman
KGKristine M Gebbie
Kristine M Gebbie
RBRoss Brownson
Ross Brownson
SZStephanie Zaza
Stephanie Zaza

29 April 2022 in MMWR. Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
BTBenedict I Truman
Benedict I Truman
MCMan-Huei Chang
Man-Huei Chang
RMRamal Moonesinghe
Ramal Moonesinghe
This report describes COVID-19 death rates by race and ethnicity how disparities decreased among most racial/ethnic groups from 2020 to 2021.

8 September 2022 in Journal of Public Health Management & Practice
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
RFRamona K. C. DrPH Finnie
Ramona K. C. DrPH Finnie
YPYinan Peng
Yinan Peng
RHRobert A. Hahn
Robert A. Hahn
ASAlex Schwartz
Alex Schwartz
KEKaren Emmons
Karen Emmons
TFThe Community Preventive Services Task Force
The Community Preventive Services Task Force
Context: Unaffordable or insecure housing is associated with poor health in children and adults. Tenant-based housing voucher programs (voucher programs) limit rent to 30% or less of household income to help households with low income obtain safe and affordable housing. Objective: To determine the effectiveness of voucher programs in improving housing, health, and other health-related outcomes for households with low income. Design: Community Guide systematic review methods were used to assess intervention effectiveness and threats to validity. An updated systematic search based on a previous Community Guide review was conducted for literature published from 1999 to July 2019 using electronic databases. Reference lists of included studies were also searched. Eligibility Criteria: Studies were included if they assessed voucher programs in the United States, had concurrent comparison populations, assessed outcomes of interest, were written in English, and published in peer-reviewed journals or government reports. Main Outcome Measures: Housing quality and stability, neighborhood opportunity (safety and poverty), education, income, employment, physical and mental health, health care use, and risky health behavior. Results: Seven studies met inclusion criteria. Compared with low-income households not offered vouchers, voucher-using households reported increased housing quality (7.9 percentage points [pct pts]), decreased housing insecurity or homelessness (−22.4 pct pts), and decreased neighborhood poverty (−5.2 pct pts). Adults in voucher-using households had improved health care access and physical and mental health. Female youth experienced better physical and mental health but not male youth. Children who entered the voucher programs under 13 years of age had improved educational attainment, employment, and income in their adulthood; children's gains in these outcomes were inversely related to their age at program entry. Conclusion: Voucher programs improved health and several health-related outcomes for voucher-using households, particularly young children. Research is still needed to better understand household's experiences and contextual factors that influence achievement of desired outcomes.

1 September 2017 in Journal of Public Health Management & Practice
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
JRJamila R. Rashid
Jamila R. Rashid
BLBrenda A. Leath
Brenda A. Leath
BTBenedict I Truman
Benedict I Truman
DADonna Durant Atkinson
Donna Durant Atkinson
LGLisa C. Gary
Lisa C. Gary
Nanmathi ManianNanmathi Manian
Nanmathi Manian
Context: In the United States, racial/ethnic minorities account for disproportionate disease and death from type 2 diabetes, hypertension, and obesity; however, interventions with measured efficacy in comparative effectiveness research are often not adopted or used widely in those communities. Objective: To assess implementation and effects of comparative effectiveness research–proven interventions translated for minority communities. Design: Mixed-method assessment with pretest–posttest single-group evaluation design. Setting: US Department of Health and Human Services, Office of Minority Health, research contractor, and advisory board; health centers, including a federally qualified community health center in Chicago, Illinois; and public housing facilities for seniors in Houston, Texas. Participants: A total of 97 black, Hispanic, and Asian participants with any combination of health care provider–diagnosed type 2 diabetes, hypertension, or obesity. Interventions: Virtual training institutes where intervention staff learned cultural competency methods of adapting effective interventions. Health educators delivered the Health Empowerment Lifestyle Program (HELP) in Chicago; community pharmacists delivered the MyRx Medication Adherence Program in Houston. Main Outcome Measures: Participation rates, satisfaction with interventions during January to April 2013, and pre- to postintervention changes in knowledge, diet, and clinical outcomes were analyzed through July 2013. Results: In Chicago, 38 patients experienced statistically significant reductions in hemoglobin A1c and systolic blood pressure, increased knowledge of hypertension management, and improved dietary behaviors. In Houston, 38 subsidized housing residents had statistically nonsignificant improvements in knowledge of self-management and adherence to medication for diabetes and hypertension but high levels of participation in pharmacist home visits and group education classes. Conclusion: Adaptation, adoption, and implementation of HELP and MyRx demonstrated important postintervention changes among racial/ethnic participants in Chicago and Houston. The communities faced similar implementation challenges across settings, targets of change, and cities. Available resources were insufficient to sustain benefits with measurable impact on racial/ethnic disparities beyond the study period. Results suggest the need for implementation studies of longer duration, greater power, and salience to policies and programs that can sustain longterm interventions on a community-wide scale.

24 October 2019 in Journal of Clinical Medicine
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
MCMan-Huei Chang
Man-Huei Chang
RMRamal Moonesinghe
Ramal Moonesinghe
LSLyna Schieber
Lyna Schieber
BTBenedict I Truman
Benedict I Truman
Unsterile opioid injection increases risk for infection transmission, including HIV, hepatitis B virus (HBV), or hepatitis C virus (HCV). We assess prevalence of and risk factors associated with opioid overdose and infections with HIV, HBV, or HCV among Medicare beneficiaries with opioid-related fee-for-service claims during 2015. We conducted a cross-sectional analysis to estimate claims for opioid use and overdose and HIV, HBV, or HCV infections, using data from US Medicare fee-for-service claims. Beneficiaries with opioid-related claims had increased odds for HIV (2.3; 95% confidence interval (CI), 2.3–2.4), acute HBV (6.7; 95% CI, 6.3–7.1), chronic HBV (5.0; 95% CI, 4.7–5.4), acute HCV (9.6; 95% CI, 9.2–10.0), and chronic HCV (8.9; 95% CI, 8.7–9.1). Beneficiaries with opioid-related claims and for HIV, HBV, or HCV infection, respectively, had a 1.1–1.9-fold odds for having a claim for opioid overdose. Independent risk factors for opioid overdose and each selected infection outcome included age, sex, race/ethnicity, region, and residence in a high-vulnerability county. Having opioid-related claims and selected demographic attributes were independent, significant risk factors for having HIV, HBV, or HCV claims among US Medicare beneficiaries. These results might help guide interventions intended to reduce incidences of HIV, HCV, and HBV infections among beneficiaries with opioid-related claims.

31 July 2020 in Public Health Reports®
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
BTBenedict I Truman
Benedict I Truman
RMRamal Moonesinghe
Ramal Moonesinghe
YBYolanda T. Brown
Yolanda T. Brown
MCMan-Huei Chang
Man-Huei Chang
JMJonathan H. Mermin
Jonathan H. Mermin
HDHazel D. Dean
Hazel D. Dean
Federal funds have been spent to reduce the disproportionate effects of HIV/AIDS on racial/ethnic minority groups in the United States. We investigated the association between federal domestic HIV funding and age-adjusted HIV death rates by race/ethnicity in the United States during 1999-2017. We analyzed HIV funding data from the Kaiser Family Foundation by federal fiscal year (FFY) and US age-adjusted death rates (AADRs) by race/ethnicity (Hispanic, non-Hispanic white, non-Hispanic black, and Asian/Pacific Islander and American Indian/Alaska Native [API+AI/AN]) from Centers for Disease Control and Prevention WONDER detailed mortality files. We fit joinpoint regression models to estimate the annual percentage change (APC), average APC, and changes in AADRs per billion US dollars in HIV funding, with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). For 19 data points, the number of joinpoints ranged from 0 to 4 on the basis of rules set by the program or by the user. A Monte Carlo permutation test indicated significant (P < .05) changes at joinpoints, and 2-sided t tests indicated significant APCs in AADRs. Domestic HIV funding increased from $10.7 billion in FFY 1999 to $26.3 billion in FFY 2017, but AADRs decreased at different rates for each racial/ethnic group. The average rate of change in AADR per US billion dollars was −9.4% (95% CI, −10.9% to −7.8%) for Hispanic residents, −7.8% (95% CI, −9.0% to −6.6%) for non-Hispanic black residents, −6.7% (95% CI, −9.3% to −4.0%) for non-Hispanic white residents, and −5.2% (95% CI, −7.8% to −2.5%) for non-Hispanic API+AI/AN residents. Increased domestic HIV funding was associated with faster decreases in age-adjusted HIV death rates for Hispanic and non-Hispanic black residents than for residents in other racial/ethnic groups. Increasing US HIV funding could be associated with decreasing future racial/ethnic disparities in the rate of HIV-related deaths.