Rationale: Despite the success of several standards of care treatment options in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC), a significant number of patients attain therapeutic resistance and eventually develop disease progression. Managing these patients are currently challenging. Hence, there is an unmet need for further efficient therapeutic options that induce anti-tumor activity and improve survival. The objective of this study was to assess the safety and therapeutic efficacy of ²²⁵Ac-PSMA-617 targeted alpha therapy (TAT) in mCRPC patients in real-world conditions.

Recently, great interest has been gained regarding fibroblast activation protein (FAP) as an excellent target for theranostics. Several FAP inhibitor molecules such as [⁶⁸Ga]Ga-labelled FAPI-02, 04, 46, and DOTA.SA.FAPi have been introduced and are highly promising molecular targets from the imaging point of view. FAP inhibitors introduced via bifunctional DOTA and DOTAGA chelators offer the possibility to complex Lutetium-177 due to an additional coordination site, and are suitable for theranostic applications owing to the increased tumor accumulation and prolonged tumor retention time. However, for therapeutic applications, very little has been accomplished, mainly due to residence times of the compounds. In an attempt to develop a promising therapeutic radiopharmaceutical, the present study aimed to evaluate and compare the biodistribution, pharmacokinetics, and dosimetry of [¹⁷⁷Lu]Lu-DOTA.SA.FAPi, and [¹⁷⁷Lu]Lu-DOTAGA.(SA.FAPi)₂ in patients with various cancers. The FAPi agents, [¹⁷⁷Lu]Lu-DOTA.SA.FAPi and [¹⁷⁷Lu]Lu-DOTAGA.(SA.FAPi)₂, were administered in two different groups of patients. Three patients (mean age—50 years) were treated with a median cumulative activity of 2.96 GBq (IQR: 2.2–3 GBq) [¹⁷⁷Lu]Lu-DOTA.SA.FAPi and seven (mean age—51 years) were treated with 1.48 GBq (IQR: 0.6–1.5) of [¹⁷⁷Lu]Lu-DOTAGA.(SA.FAPi)₂. Patients in both the groups underwent serial imaging whole-body planar and SPECT/CT scans that were acquired between 1 h and 168 h post-injection (p.i.). The residence time and absorbed dose estimate in the source organs and tumor were calculated using OLINDA/EXM 2.2 software. Time versus activity graphs were plotted to determine the effective half-life (Te) in the whole body and lesions for both the radiotracers. Physiological uptake of [¹⁷⁷Lu]Lu-DOTA.SA.FAPi was observed in the kidneys, colon, pancreas, liver, gall bladder, oral mucosa, lacrimal glands, and urinary bladder contents. Physiological biodistribution of [¹⁷⁷Lu]Lu-DOTAGA.(SA.FAPi)₂ involved liver, gall bladder, colon, pancreas, kidneys, and urinary bladder contents, lacrimal glands, oral mucosa, and salivary glands. In the [¹⁷⁷Lu]Lu-DOTA.SA.FAPi group, the highest absorbed doses were noted in the kidneys (0.618 ± 0.015 Gy/GBq), followed by the colon (right colon: 0.472 Gy/GBq and left colon: 0.430 Gy/GBq). In the [¹⁷⁷Lu]Lu-DOTAGA.(SA.FAPi)₂ group, the colon received the highest absorbed dose (right colon: 1.160 Gy/GBq and left colon: 2.870 Gy/GBq), and demonstrated a significantly higher mean absorbed dose than [¹⁷⁷Lu]Lu-DOTA.SA.FAPi (p < 0.011). [¹⁷⁷Lu]Lu-DOTAGA.(SA.FAPi)₂ had significantly longer median whole-body Te compared to that of [¹⁷⁷Lu]Lu-DOTA.SA.FAPi [46.2 h (IQR: 38.5–70.1) vs. 23.1 h (IQR: 17.8–31.5); p-0.0167]. The Te of tumor lesions was significantly higher for [¹⁷⁷Lu]Lu-DOTAGA.(SA.FAPi)₂ compared to [¹⁷⁷Lu]Lu-DOTA.SA.FAPi [86.6 h (IQR: 34.3–94.6) vs. 14 h (IQR: 12.8–15.5); p-0.0004]. The median absorbed doses to the lesions were 0.603 (IQR: 0.230–1.810) Gy/GBq and 6.70 (IQR: 3.40–49) Gy/GBq dose per cycle in the [¹⁷⁷Lu]Lu-DOTA.SA.FAPi, and [¹⁷⁷Lu]Lu-DOTAGA.(SA.FAPi)₂ groups, respectively. The first clinical dosimetry study demonstrated significantly higher tumor absorbed doses with [¹⁷⁷Lu]Lu-DOTAGA.(SA.FAPi)₂ compared to [¹⁷⁷Lu]Lu-DOTA.SA.FAPi. [¹⁷⁷Lu]Lu-DOTAGA.(SA.FAPi)₂ is safe and unveiled new frontiers to treat various end-stage cancer patients with a theranostic approach.

Remnant ablation can be achieved by either administering an empiric fixed dose or using dosimetry-guided techniques. Because of the technical and logistic difficulties, most centers have adapted the fixed-dose or standard-dose technique for remnant ablation using (131)I. In the late 1970s, low-dose (131)I remnant ablation was introduced, and subsequently many centers confirmed the effectiveness of such therapy. However, the optimal dose (administered activity) of (131)I for remnant ablation is not yet settled. In a randomized clinical trial to find out the smallest possible effective dose for remnant ablation in cases of differentiated thyroid carcinoma, between July 1995 and January 2002, 565 patients were randomized into eight groups according to (131)I administered activity, starting at 15 mCi and increasing activity in increments of 5 mCi until 50 mCi. In the postrandomization phase, 56 patients were excluded from the study for various reasons, and final analysis was done with 509 patients. The mean age of the patients was 37.5 +/- 12.7 yr with a female to male ratio of 2.6. The surgical procedure was total/near-total thyroidectomy in 72% and subtotal or hemithyroidectomy in the rest. Histology was papillary thyroid carcinoma in 80.6% of patients and follicular thyroid carcinoma in the rest. With one dose of (131)I, remnant ablation was achieved in 59.6, 63.6, 81.4, 83.6, 79.4, 78.3, 84.4, and 81.8% of patients in the 15- to 50-mCi groups, respectively (overall ablation rate, 77.6%). The successful ablation rate was statistically different in patients receiving less than 25 mCi of (131)I compared with those receiving at least 25 mCi [63 of 102 (61.8%) vs. 332 of 407 (81.6%); P = 0.006]. However, there was no significant intergroup difference in outcome among patients receiving 25-50 mCi of (131)I. Patients with small tumor size (