Mickael Deroche

Dr. Mickael Deroche

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

19Years (2008-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 April 2015 in Hearing Research
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
MCMonita Chatterjee
Monita Chatterjee
DZDanielle J. Zion
Danielle J. Zion
MDMickael Deroche
Mickael Deroche
BBBrooke A. Burianek
Brooke A. Burianek
CLCharles J. Limb
Charles J. Limb
JCJulie A. Christensen
Julie A. Christensen

1 September 2017 in Hearing Research
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
NJNicole T. Jiam
Nicole T. Jiam
MCM. Caldwell
M. Caldwell
MDMickael Deroche
Mickael Deroche
MCM. Chatterjee
M. Chatterjee
CLC.J. Limb
C.J. Limb

9 September 2014 in Frontiers in Neuroscience
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
MDMickael Deroche
Mickael Deroche
HLHui-Ping Lu
Hui-Ping Lu
CLCharles J. Limb
Charles J. Limb
YLYung-Song Lin
Yung-Song Lin
MCMonita Chatterjee
Monita Chatterjee
Sensitivity to complex pitch is notoriously poor in adults with cochlear implants (CIs), but it is unclear whether this is true for children with CIs. Many are implanted today at a very young age, and factors related to brain plasticity (age at implantation, duration of CI experience, and speaking a tonal language) might have strong influences on pitch sensitivity. School-aged children participated, speaking English or Mandarin, having normal hearing (NH) or wearing a CI, using their clinically assigned settings with envelope-based coding strategies. Percent correct was measured in three-interval three-alternative forced choice tasks, for the discrimination of fundamental frequency (F0) of broadband harmonic complexes, and for the discrimination of sinusoidal amplitude modulation rate (AMR) of broadband noise, with reference frequencies at 100 and 200 Hz to focus on voice pitch processing. Data were fitted using a maximum-likelihood technique. CI children displayed higher thresholds and shallower slopes than NH children in F0 discrimination, regardless of linguistic background. Thresholds and slopes were more similar between NH and CI children in AMR discrimination. Once the effect of chronological age was extracted from the variance, the aforementioned factors related to brain plasticity did not contribute significantly to the CI children’s sensitivity to pitch. Unless different strategies attempt to encode fine structure information, potential benefits of plasticity may be missed.

24 May 2017 in Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
SPShu-Chen Peng
Shu-Chen Peng
HLHui-Ping Lu
Hui-Ping Lu
NLNelson Lu
Nelson Lu
YLYung-Song Lin
Yung-Song Lin
MDMickael Deroche
Mickael Deroche
MCMonita Chatterjee
Monita Chatterjee
Purpose: The objective was to investigate acoustic cue processing in lexical-tone recognition by pediatric cochlear-implant (CI) recipients who are native Mandarin speakers. Method: Lexical-tone recognition was assessed in pediatric CI recipients and listeners with normal hearing (NH) in 2 tasks. In Task 1, participants identified naturally uttered words that were contrastive in lexical tones. For Task 2, a disyllabic word ( yanjing ) was manipulated orthogonally, varying in fundamental-frequency (F0) contours and duration patterns. Participants identified each token with the second syllable jing pronounced with Tone 1 (a high level tone) as eyes or with Tone 4 (a high falling tone) as eyeglasses. Results: CI participants' recognition accuracy was significantly lower than NH listeners' in Task 1. In Task 2, CI participants' reliance on F0 contours was significantly less than that of NH listeners; their reliance on duration patterns, however, was significantly higher than that of NH listeners. Both CI and NH listeners' performance in Task 1 was significantly correlated with their reliance on F0 contours in Task 2. Conclusion: For pediatric CI recipients, lexical-tone recognition using naturally uttered words is primarily related to their reliance on F0 contours, although duration patterns may be used as an additional cue.

27 February 2019 in Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
NJNicole T. Jiam
Nicole T. Jiam
MDMickael Deroche
Mickael Deroche
PJPatpong Jiradejvong
Patpong Jiradejvong
CLCharles J. Limb
Charles J. Limb

14 January 2019 in Scientific Reports
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
MDMickael Deroche
Mickael Deroche
HLHui-Ping Lu
Hui-Ping Lu
AKAditya M. Kulkarni
Aditya M. Kulkarni
MCMeredith Caldwell
Meredith Caldwell
Karen BarrettKaren Barrett
Karen Barrett
MCMonita Chatterjee
Monita Chatterjee
In tonal languages, voice pitch inflections change the meaning of words, such that the brain processes pitch not merely as an acoustic characterization of sound but as semantic information. In normally-hearing (NH) adults, this linguistic pressure on pitch appears to sharpen its neural encoding and can lead to perceptual benefits, depending on the task relevance, potentially generalizing outside of the speech domain. In children, however, linguistic systems are still malleable, meaning that their encoding of voice pitch information might not receive as much neural specialization but might generalize more easily to ecologically irrelevant pitch contours. This would seem particularly true for early-deafened children wearing a cochlear implant (CI), who must exhibit great adaptability to unfamiliar sounds as their sense of pitch is severely degraded. Here, we provide the first demonstration of a tonal language benefit in dynamic pitch sensitivity among NH children (using both a sweep discrimination and labelling task) which extends partially to children with CI (i.e., in the labelling task only). Strong age effects suggest that sensitivity to pitch contours reaches adult-like levels early in tonal language speakers (possibly before 6 years of age) but continues to develop in non-tonal language speakers well into the teenage years. Overall, we conclude that language-dependent neuroplasticity can enhance behavioral sensitivity to dynamic pitch, even in extreme cases of auditory degradation, but it is most easily observable early in life.