Paul Geerlings

Dr. Paul Geerlings


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

32Years (1995-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
17 April 2003 in Chemical Reviews
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PGPaul Geerlings
Paul Geerlings
FPF. De Proft
F. De Proft
WLW. Langenaeker
W. Langenaeker

31 January 2020 in Theoretical Chemistry Accounts
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
PGPaul Geerlings
Paul Geerlings
ECEduardo Chamorro
Eduardo Chamorro
PCPratim K. Chattaraj
Pratim K. Chattaraj
DFDe Proft Frank
De Proft Frank
JGJosé L. Gázquez
José L. Gázquez
PAPaul Ayers
Paul Ayers

10 August 2022 in Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
ATAndrew Teale
Andrew Teale
THTrygve Helgaker
Trygve Helgaker
ASAndreas Savin
Andreas Savin
CACarlo Adamo
Carlo Adamo
BABálint Aradi
Bálint Aradi
WYWeitao Yang
Weitao Yang
In this paper, the history, present status, and future of density-functional theory (DFT) is informally reviewed and discussed by 70 workers in the field, including molecular scientists, materials scientists, method developers and practitioners.

13 March 2008 in Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
PGPaul Geerlings
Paul Geerlings
FPF. De Proft
F. De Proft
In recent years conceptual density functional theory offered a perspective for the interpretation/prediction of experimental/theoretical reactivity data on the basis of a series of response functions to perturbations in the number of electrons and/or external potential. This approach has enabled the sharp definition and computation, from first principles, of a series of well-known but sometimes vaguely defined chemical concepts such as electronegativity and hardness. In this contribution, a short overview of the shortcomings of the simplest, first order response functions is illustrated leading to a description of chemical bonding in a covalent interaction in terms of interacting atoms or groups, governed by electrostatics with the tendency to polarize bonds on the basis of electronegativity differences. The second order approach, well known until now, introduces the hardness/softness and Fukui function concepts related to polarizability and frontier MO theory, respectively. The introduction of polarizability/softness is also considered in a historical perspective in which polarizability was, with some exceptions, mainly put forward in non covalent interactions. A particular series of response functions, arising when the changes in the external potential are solely provoked by changes in nuclear configurations (the “R-analogues”) are also systematically considered. The main part of the contribution is devoted to third order response functions which, at first sight, may be expected not to yield chemically significant information, as turns out to be for the hyperhardness. A counterexample is the dual descriptor and its R analogue, the initial hardness response, which turns out to yield a firm basis to regain the Woodward–Hoffmann rules for pericyclic reactions based on a density-only basis, i.e. without involving the phase, sign, symmetry of the wavefunction. Even the second order nonlinear response functions are shown possibly to bear interesting information, e.g. on the local and global polarizability. Its derivatives may govern the influence of charge on the polarizability, the R-analogues being the nuclear Fukui function and the quadratic and cubic force constants. Although some of the higher order derivatives may be difficult to evaluate a comparison with the energy expansion used in spectroscopy in terms of nuclear displacements, nuclear magnetic moments, electric and magnetic fields leads to the conjecture that, certainly cross terms may contain new, intricate information for understanding chemical reactivity.

28 June 2002 in Journal of Computational Chemistry
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
FPF. De Proft
F. De Proft
CAC. Van Alsenoy
C. Van Alsenoy
APA. Peeters
A. Peeters
WLW. Langenaeker
W. Langenaeker
PGPaul Geerlings
Paul Geerlings

1 January 2005 in Nucleic Acids Research
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
PMPierre Mignon
Pierre Mignon
SLStefan Loverix
Stefan Loverix
JSJan Steyaert
Jan Steyaert
PGPaul Geerlings
Paul Geerlings
The interplay between aromatic stacking and hydrogen bonding in nucleobases has been investigated via high-level quantum chemical calculations. The experimentally observed stacking arrangement between consecutive bases in DNA and RNA/DNA double helices is shown to enhance their hydrogen bonding ability as opposed to gas phase optimized complexes. This phenomenon results from more repulsive electrostatic interactions as is demonstrated in a model system of cytosine stacked offset-parallel with substituted benzenes. Therefore, the H-bonding capacity of the N3 and O2 atoms of cytosine increases linearly with the electrostatic repulsion between the stacked rings. The local hardness, a density functional theory-based reactivity descriptor, appears to be a key index associated with the molecular electrostatic potential (MEP) minima around H-bond accepting atoms, and is inversely proportional to the electrostatic interaction between stacked molecules. Finally, the MEP minima on surfaces around the bases in experimental structures of DNA and RNA–DNA double helices show that their hydrogen bonding capacity increases when taking more neighboring (intra-strand) stacking partners into account.