Kati Hiltrop

Mrs. Kati Hiltrop

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

8Years (2019-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
9 February 2022 in BMC Psychiatry
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
CBClara Breidenbach
Clara Breidenbach
PHPaula Heidkamp
Paula Heidkamp
KHKati Hiltrop
Kati Hiltrop
Holger PfaffHolger Pfaff
Holger Pfaff
AEAnna Enders
Anna Enders
CKChristoph Kowalski
Christoph Kowalski
Background: There is a significant number of long-term breast cancer survivors in Germany. However, research on the psychological challenges of cancer survivors is limited. This analysis describes prevalence, development and determinants of depression and anxiety 5 to 6 years after diagnosis and identifies predictors for an increase of anxiety and depression over time. Methods: Data from 164 women was collected by survey and tumour documentation during post-operative hospital stay, 40 weeks and 5 to 6 years after diagnosis. Anxiety and depression were measured by the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale. Sankey-diagrams were created for visual presentation of prevalence over time. Logistic and linear regression models were calculated to identify determinants of anxiety and depression. Results: Respondents had higher levels of depression and anxiety 5 to 6 years than 40 weeks after the diagnosis. Lower vocational status and having children were associated with depression, surgery type was correlated with anxiety, and age, as well as comorbidities, were predictors for both anxiety and depression 5 to 6 years after diagnosis. An increase of depression over time was more likely when having children and comorbidities. An increase in anxiety was less likely after cancer recurrence. Conclusions: Findings highlight that anxiety and depression are relevant burdens for breast cancer survivors in Germany. Several sociodemographic and clinical predictors are identified. There is need for psychosocial support after acute treatment and in the long-term. Research on psychological burdens of long-term breast cancer survivors in the identified vulnerable groups is needed.

23 January 2021 in European Journal of Cancer Care
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
KHKati Hiltrop
Kati Hiltrop
PHPaula Heidkamp
Paula Heidkamp
SHSarah Halbach
Sarah Halbach
EBEvamarie Brock‐Midding
Evamarie Brock‐Midding
CKChristoph Kowalski
Christoph Kowalski
NENicole Ernstmann
Nicole Ernstmann
Objective: Knowledge regarding the occupational rehabilitation of male breast cancer patients (MBCPs) is currently scarce; however, there may exist unmet needs of men affected by this rare disease. Therefore, this exploratory study investigated the experiences of MBCPs in their return to work (RTW).Methods: Interview data from 14 men with a breast cancer diagnosis were used for qualitative content analysis. Data were collected within the mixed‐methods N‐MALE project (Male breast cancer: patients' needs in prevention, diagnosis, treatment, rehabilitation, and follow‐up care), conducted in Germany from 2016 to 2018.Results: The eight identified motives for RTW were desire for normalcy, distraction, need for activity, social contacts, work as a source of pleasure, financial considerations, lack of self‐perception of illness, and having a job requiring low physical effort. The participants reported positive experiences with their workplaces from diagnosis through RTW. However, stigmatisation occurred. The aftermath of the disease and treatment led to changes in the interviewees' productivity, for instance due to fatigue.Conclusion: The findings of this study contribute to a better understanding of RTW processes, as new insights were gained about motives and experiences particular to MBCPs. Support needs after return were apparent and may help to reduce long‐term effects that limit productivity.

17 July 2021 in Psycho-Oncology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
KHKati Hiltrop
Kati Hiltrop
PHPaula Heidkamp
Paula Heidkamp
CBClara Breidenbach
Clara Breidenbach
CKChristoph Kowalski
Christoph Kowalski
MSMarco Streibelt
Marco Streibelt
NENicole Ernstmann
Nicole Ernstmann
Objective This study explores rehabilitation processes in long-term cancer survivors (CSs) and explains the causes, contexts, and consequences under which decisions related to rehabilitation are made. Methods Within the mixed-methods Breast Cancer Patients' Return to Work (B-CARE) project, conducted from 2018–2020, data were collected through a written survey and semi-structured interviews with CSs 5–6 years after their diagnosis. In total, 184 female CSs participated in the survey, and 26 were interviewed. A qualitative grounded theory approach was applied. Results The 26 interviewees were 57 years old on average, 70% were married, and 65% had children. The participants experienced incompatibilities caused by the cancer disease in their areas of life and the demands that arose from it. To reconcile demands from the areas family, work, leisure time, household, and disease, the interviewed CSs used different coping mechanisms and adjusted their lives by prioritizing certain areas as a consequence. This prioritizing was often to the detriment of work and rehabilitation. Furthermore, it worked as a barrier for participation in rehabilitation programs and explains why CSs experienced job changes after their return to work. Conclusions Physical and mental long-term effects were observed in the interviewees' lives 5–6 years into survival. The study results stress the importance of individualized and needs-oriented survivorship care.

29 December 2022 in BMJ Open
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
AKAndré Karger
André Karger
APAndrea Petermann-Meyer
Andrea Petermann-Meyer
FVFrank Vitinius
Frank Vitinius
FGFranziska Geiser
Franziska Geiser
DKDaria Kraus
Daria Kraus
NENicole Ernstmann
Nicole Ernstmann
Introduction Patient–provider communication is an important factor influencing the quality of care in oncology. The study examines the comparative effectiveness of a 10-hour interprofessional communication skills training (CST) programme for physicians and nurses in cancer centres. Methods and analysis KommRhein Interpro is a cluster-randomised trial sponsored by the German Cancer Aid (Deutsche Krebshilfe, DKH) and conducted at the cancer centres of the university hospitals of Aachen, Bonn, Cologne and Düsseldorf. Thirty oncology teams of four cancer centres are randomly assigned to three study arms, providing healthcare professionals with either (a) only written information on patient-centred communication or (b) written information plus CST for physicians or (c) written information plus interprofessional CST for physicians and nurses. For summative evaluation, standardised surveys from three measurement points for patients (T0pat: study enrollment; T1pat: after discharge; T2pat: 3 months’ follow-up) and two measurement points for physicians and nurses (T0hcp: before the intervention; T1hcp: after the intervention) are used. N=1320 valid patient cases are needed for data evaluation. The primary endpoint is fear of progression in patients with cancer after discharge. Data will be analysed according to the intention-to-treat principle using a mixed model for repeated measurement. Secondary outcome is the providers’ self-efficacy in patient centeredness. Individual confounders and possible moderating effects of organisational factors will be considered. Secondary analysis will be performed by means of multilevel analysis and structural equation modelling. Ethics and dissemination A vote of approval has been obtained from the ethics committees of the medical faculties of RWTH Aachen University (EK325/20), University of Bonn (391/20), University of Cologne (20–1332) and Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf (2019–796). Data protection regulations are adhered to for all processed data. The conduct of the study will be monitored. Dissemination strategies include a transfer workshop with cancer teams and distribution of the final study report to participants. Trial registration number DRKS00022563; DRKS (German Clinical Trials Register).

27 April 2021 in Journal of Cancer Survivorship
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
KHKati Hiltrop
Kati Hiltrop
PHPaula Heidkamp
Paula Heidkamp
CBClara Breidenbach
Clara Breidenbach
CKChristoph Kowalski
Christoph Kowalski
AEAnna Enders
Anna Enders
NENicole Ernstmann
Nicole Ernstmann
Purpose: Considering that breast cancer survivors (BCSs) have been dealing with unwanted job changes after diagnosis, this study aimed to investigate involuntary job changes (unwanted modifications in employment since diagnosis) and explore the association between job changes, involuntariness, and occupational development satisfaction in BCSs 5–6 years after diagnosis. Methods: Data were drawn from the mixed-methods breast cancer patients’ return to work (B-CARE) study. We surveyed 184 female BCSs who were working at the time of study enrollment during hospitalization (T1), 10 weeks after discharge (T2), 40 weeks after discharge (T3), and 5–6 years after diagnosis (T4) and used descriptive measures and stepwise linear regression models for data analysis. Results: The mean age of BCSs was 57 years. A total of 105 participants reported 410 job changes, of which 16.1% were reportedly (rather) involuntary. The most commonly reported involuntary changes were increased workload (15.2%) and increased scope of work (15.2%). In the final model, significant predictors of satisfaction with occupational development 5–6 years after diagnosis were age, state of health ΔT2–T3, state of health ΔT3–T4, and involuntariness of job changes. Conclusions: Although the number of job changes alone is not substantially associated with BCSs’ satisfaction with occupational development, experiencing involuntary job changes is. Sociodemographic, disease-related, and work(place)-related factors may influence occupational satisfaction among BCSs. Implications for Cancer Survivors: The findings indicate the importance of strengthening one’s ability to work as desired to prevent involuntary job changes and enable desired work participation in long-term support. The significance of workplace characteristics highlights the need for employers to encourage satisfying work participation. Trial registration number: German Clinical Trials Register (DRKS00016982), 12 April 2019

KHKati Hiltrop
Kati Hiltrop
NHNina Hiebel
Nina Hiebel
FGFranziska Geiser
Franziska Geiser
MKMilena Kriegsmann-Rabe
Milena Kriegsmann-Rabe
NGNikoloz Gambashidze
Nikoloz Gambashidze
NENicole Ernstmann
Nicole Ernstmann
Background: Thus far, there is no instrument available measuring COVID-19 related health literacy of healthcare professionals. Therefore, the aim of this study was to develop an instrument assessing COVID-19 related health literacy in healthcare professionals (HL-COV-HP) and evaluate its psychometric properties. Methods: An exploratory factor analysis, a confirmatory factor analysis, and descriptive analyses were conducted using data from n = 965 healthcare professionals. Health literacy related to COVID-19 was measured with 12 items, which were adapted from the validated HLS-EU-Q16 instrument measuring general health literacy. Results: Exploratory factor analysis demonstrated that 12 items loaded on one component. After removing one item due to its high standardized residual covariance, the confirmatory factor analysis of a one-factor model with 11 items showed satisfactory model fit (χ2 = 199.340, df = 41, χ2/df = 4.862, p < 0.001, RMSEA = 0.063, CFI = 0.963 and TLI = 0.951). The HL-COV-HP instrument showed good internal consistency (Cronbach’s alpha 0.87) and acceptable construct reliability. Conclusions: The HL-COV-HP is a reliable, valid, and feasible instrument to assess the COVID-19 related health literacy in healthcare professionals. It can be used in hospitals or other healt hcare settings to assess the motivation and ability of healthcare professionals to find, understand, evaluate, and use COVID-19 information.