Malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM) arises from mesothelial cells lining the pleural cavity of asbestos‐exposed individuals and rapidly leads to death. MPM harbors loss‐of‐function mutations in BAP1 , NF2 , CDKN2A , and TP53 , but isolated deletion of these genes alone in mice does not cause MPM and mouse models of the disease are sparse. Here, we show that a proportion of human MPM harbor point mutations, copy number alterations, and overexpression of KRAS with or without TP53 changes. These are likely pathogenic, since ectopic expression of mutant KRAS ^G12D in the pleural mesothelium of conditional mice causes epithelioid MPM and cooperates with TP53 deletion to drive a more aggressive disease form with biphasic features and pleural effusions. Murine MPM cell lines derived from these tumors carry the initiating KRAS ^G12D lesions, secondary Bap1 alterations, and human MPM‐like gene expression profiles. Moreover, they are transplantable and actionable by KRAS inhibition. Our results indicate that KRAS alterations alone or in accomplice with TP53 alterations likely play an important and underestimated role in a proportion of patients with MPM, which warrants further exploration.

Background: Survival after curative resection of early-stage lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD) varies and prognostic biomarkers are urgently needed.Methods: Large-format tissue samples from a prospective cohort of 200 patients with resected LUAD were immunophenotyped for cancer hallmarks TP53, NF1, CD45, PD-1, PCNA, TUNEL and FVIII, and were followed for a median of 2.34 (95% CI 1.71–3.49) years.Results: Unsupervised hierarchical clustering revealed two patient subgroups with similar clinicopathological features and genotype, but with markedly different survival: “proliferative” patients (60%) with elevated TP53, NF1, CD45 and PCNA expression had 50% 5-year overall survival, while “apoptotic” patients (40%) with high TUNEL had 70% 5-year survival (hazard ratio 2.23, 95% CI 1.33–3.80; p=0.0069). Cox regression and machine learning algorithms including random forests built clinically useful models: a score to predict overall survival and a formula and nomogram to predict tumour phenotype. The distinct LUAD phenotypes were validated in The Cancer Genome Atlas and KMplotter data, and showed prognostic power supplementary to International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer tumour–node–metastasis stage and World Health Organization histologic classification.Conclusions: Two molecular subtypes of LUAD exist and their identification provides important prognostic information.

Epigenetic approaches in direct correlation with assessment of critical genetic mutations in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) are currently very intensive, as the epigenetic components underlying NSCLC development and progression have attained high recognition. In this level of research, established human NSCLC cell lines as well as experimental animals are widely used to detect novel biomarkers and pharmacological targets to treat NSCLC. The epigenetic background holds a great potential for the identification of epi-biomarkers for treatment response however, it is highly complex and requires precise definition as these phenomena are variable between NSCLC subtypes and systems origin.

Kirsten rat sarcoma virus (KRAS)-mutant cancers are frequent, metastatic, lethal, and largely undruggable. While interleukin (IL)-1β and nuclear factor (NF)-κB inhibition hold promise against cancer, untargeted treatments are not effective. Here, we show that human KRAS-mutant cancers are addicted to IL-1β via inflammatory versican signaling to macrophage inhibitor of NF-κB kinase (IKK) β. Human pan-cancer and experimental NF-κB reporter, transcriptome, and proteome screens reveal that KRAS-mutant tumors trigger macrophage IKKβ activation and IL-1β release via secretory versican. Tumor-specific versican silencing and macrophage-restricted IKKβ deletion prevents myeloid NF-κB activation and metastasis. Versican and IKKβ are mutually addicted and/or overexpressed in human cancers and possess diagnostic and prognostic power. Non-oncogene KRAS/IL-1β addiction is abolished by IL-1β and TLR1/2 inhibition, indicating cardinal and actionable roles for versican and IKKβ in metastasis.

KRAS (KRAS proto-oncogene, GTPase) inhibitors perform less well than other targeted drugs in vitro and fail clinical trials. To investigate a possible reason for this, we treated human and murine tumor cells with KRAS inhibitors deltarasin (targeting phosphodiesterase-δ), cysmethynil (targeting isoprenylcysteine carboxylmethyltransferase), and AA12 (targeting KRAS^G12C), and silenced/overexpressed mutant KRAS using custom-designed vectors. We showed that KRAS-mutant tumor cells exclusively respond to KRAS blockade in vivo, because the oncogene co-opts host myeloid cells via a C-C-motif chemokine ligand 2 (CCL2)/interleukin-1 beta (IL-1β)-mediated signaling loop for sustained tumorigenicity. Indeed, KRAS-mutant tumors did not respond to deltarasin in C-C motif chemokine receptor 2 (Ccr2) and Il1b gene-deficient mice, but were deltarasin-sensitive in wild-type and Ccr2-deficient mice adoptively transplanted with wild-type murine bone marrow. A KRAS-dependent pro-inflammatory transcriptome was prominent in human cancers with high KRAS mutation prevalence and poor predicted survival. Our findings support that in vitro cellular systems are suboptimal for anti-KRAS drug screens, as these drugs function to suppress interleukin-1 receptor 1 (IL1R1) expression and myeloid IL-1β-delivered pro-growth effects in vivo. Moreover, the findings support that IL-1β blockade might be suitable for therapy for KRAS-mutant cancers.

KRAS inhibitors perform inferior to other targeted drugs. To investigate a possible reason for this, we treated cancer cells with KRAS inhibitors deltarasin (targeting phosphodiesterase-δ), cysmethynil (targeting isoprenylcysteine carboxylmethyltransferase), and AA12 (targeting KRAS ^G12C ), and silenced/overexpressed mutant KRAS using custom vectors. We show that KRAS -mutant tumor cells exclusively respond to KRAS blockade in vivo , because the oncogene co-opts host myeloid cells via a C-C-motif chemokine ligand 2/interleukin-1β signaling loop for sustained tumorigenicity. Indeed, KRAS -mutant tumors did not respond to deltarasin in Ccr2 and Il1b gene-deficient mice, but were deltarasin-sensitive in wild-type and Ccr2 -deficient mice adoptively transplanted with wild-type murine bone marrow. A KRAS-dependent pro-inflammatory transcriptome was prominent in human cancers with high KRAS mutation prevalence and predicted poor survival. Hence the findings support that in vitro systems are suboptimal for anti-KRAS drug screens, and suggest that interleukin-1β blockade might be specific for KRAS -mutant cancers.