Magnetic Resonance (MR) images suffer from spatial inhomogeneity, known as bias field corruption. The N4ITK filter is a state-of-the-art method used for correcting the bias field to optimize MR-based quantification. In this study, a novel approach is presented to quantitatively evaluate the performance of N4 bias field correction for pelvic prostate imaging. An exploratory analysis, regarding the different values of convergence threshold, shrink factor, fitting level, number of iterations and use of mask, is performed to quantify the performance of N4 filter in pelvic MR images. The performance of a total of 240 different N4 configurations is examined using the Full Width at Half Maximum (FWHM) of the segmented periprostatic fat distribution as evaluation metric. Phantom T2weighted images were used to assess the performance of N4 for a uniform test tissue mimicking material, excluding factors such as patient related susceptibility and anatomy heterogeneity. Moreover, 89 and 204 T2weighted patient images from two public datasets acquired by scanners with a combined surface and endorectal coil at 1.5 T and a surface coil at 3 T, respectively, were utilized and corrected with a variable set of N4 parameters. Furthermore, two external public datasets were used to validate the performance of the N4 filter in T2weighted patient images acquired by various scanning conditions with different magnetic field strengths and coils. The results show that the set of N4 parameters, converging to optimal representations of fat in the image, were: convergence threshold 0.001, shrink factor 2, fitting level 6, number of iterations 100 and the use of default mask for prostate images acquired by a combined surface and endorectal coil at both 1.5 T and 3 T. The corresponding optimal N4 configuration for MR prostate images acquired by a surface coil at 1.5 T or 3 T was: convergence threshold 0.001, shrink factor 2, fitting level 5, number of iterations 25 and the use of default mask. Hence, periprostatic fat segmentation can be used to define the optimal settings for achieving T2weighted prostate images free from bias field corruption to provide robust input for further analysis.

Radiotranscriptomics is an emerging field that aims to investigate the relationships between the radiomic features extracted from medical images and gene expression profiles that contribute in the diagnosis, treatment planning, and prognosis of cancer. This study proposes a methodological framework for the investigation of these associations with application on non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Six publicly available NSCLC datasets with transcriptomics data were used to derive and validate a transcriptomic signature for its ability to differentiate between cancer and non-malignant lung tissue. A publicly available dataset of 24 NSCLC-diagnosed patients, with both transcriptomic and imaging data, was used for the joint radiotranscriptomic analysis. For each patient, 749 Computed Tomography (CT) radiomic features were extracted and the corresponding transcriptomics data were provided through DNA microarrays. The radiomic features were clustered using the iterative K-means algorithm resulting in 77 homogeneous clusters, represented by meta-radiomic features. The most significant differentially expressed genes (DEGs) were selected by performing Significance Analysis of Microarrays (SAM) and 2-fold change. The interactions among the CT imaging features and the selected DEGs were investigated using SAM and a Spearman rank correlation test with a False Discovery Rate (FDR) of 5%, leading to the extraction of 73 DEGs significantly correlated with radiomic features. These genes were used to produce predictive models of the meta-radiomics features, defined as p-metaomics features, by performing Lasso regression. Of the 77 meta-radiomic features, 51 can be modeled in terms of the transcriptomic signature. These significant radiotranscriptomics relationships form a reliable basis to biologically justify the radiomics features extracted from anatomic imaging modalities. Thus, the biological value of these radiomic features was justified via enrichment analysis on their transcriptomics-based regression models, revealing closely associated biological processes and pathways. Overall, the proposed methodological framework provides joint radiotranscriptomics markers and models to support the connection and complementarities between the transcriptome and the phenotype in cancer, as demonstrated in the case of NSCLC.

Image quality assessment of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) data is an important factor not only for conventional diagnosis and protocol optimization but also for fairness, trustworthiness, and robustness of artificial intelligence (AI) applications, especially on large heterogeneous datasets. Information on image quality in multi-centric studies is important to complement the contribution profile from each data node along with quantity information, especially when large variability is expected, and certain acceptance criteria apply. The main goal of this work was to present a tool enabling users to assess image quality based on both subjective criteria as well as objective image quality metrics used to support the decision on image quality based on evidence. The evaluation can be performed on both conventional and dynamic MRI acquisition protocols, while the latter is also checked longitudinally across dynamic series. The assessment provides an overall image quality score and information on the types of artifacts and degrading factors as well as a number of objective metrics for automated evaluation across series (BRISQUE score, Total Variation, PSNR, SSIM, FSIM, MS-SSIM). Moreover, the user can define specific regions of interest (ROIs) to calculate the regional signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) and contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR), thus individualizing the quality output to specific use cases, such as tissue-specific contrast or regional noise quantification.

This study aims to develop an explainable radiomics-based model for the automatic as-sessment of image quality in breast cancer Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced Magnetic Reso-nance Imaging (DCE-MRI) data. A cohort of 280 images obtained from a public database was annotated by two clinical experts, resulting in 110 high-quality and 110 low-quality images. The proposed methodology involved the extraction of 819 radiomic features and two No-Reference image quality metrics per patient, using both the whole image and the background as regions of interest. Feature extraction was performed under two scenarios: (i) from a sample of 12 slices per patient, and (ii) from the middle slice of each patient. Following model training, a range of machine learning classifiers was applied with ex-plainability assessed through SHapley Additive Explanations (SHAP). The best perfor-mance was achieved in the second scenario, where combining features from the whole image and background with a support vector machine classifier yielded sensitivity, speci-ficity, accuracy, and AUC values of 85.51%, 80.01%, 82.76%, and 89.37%, respectively. This proposed model demonstrates potential for integration into clinical practice and may also serve as a valuable resource for large-scale repositories and subgroup analyses aimed at ensuring fairness and explainability.

This study aims to develop an explainable radiomics-based model for the automatic assessment of image quality in breast cancer Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced Magnetic Resonance Imaging (DCE-MRI) data. A cohort of 280 images obtained from a public database was annotated by two clinical experts, resulting in 110 high-quality and 110 low-quality images. The proposed methodology involved the extraction of 819 radiomic features and 2 No-Reference image quality metrics per patient, using both the whole image and the background as regions of interest. Feature extraction was performed under two scenarios: (i) from a sample of 12 slices per patient, and (ii) from the middle slice of each patient. Following model training, a range of machine learning classifiers were applied with explainability assessed through SHapley Additive Explanations (SHAP). The best performance was achieved in the second scenario, where combining features from the whole image and background with a support vector machine classifier yielded sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, and AUC values of 85.51%, 80.01%, 82.76%, and 89.37%, respectively. This proposed model demonstrates potential for integration into clinical practice and may also serve as a valuable resource for large-scale repositories and subgroup analyses aimed at ensuring fairness and explainability.