Article Defining analytical performance specifications: Consensus Statement from the 1st Strategic Conference of the European Federation of Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine was published on May 1, 2015 in the journal Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine (CCLM) (volume 53, issue 6).

Background: Evaluation of patients who present to the hospital with a complaint of chest pain or other signs or symptoms suggestive of acute coronary syndrome (ACS) is time-consuming, expensive, and problematic. Recent investigations have indicated that increases in biomarkers upstream from biomarkers of necrosis (cardiac troponins I and T), such as inflammatory cytokines, cellular adhesion molecules, acute-phase reactants, plaque destabilization and rupture biomarkers, biomarkers of ischemia, and biomarkers of myocardial stretch may provide earlier assessment of overall patient risk and aid in identifying patients with higher risk of an adverse event. Approach and Content: The purpose of this review is to provide an overview of the pathophysiology and clinical and analytical characteristics of several biomarkers that may have potential clinical utility to identify ACS patients. These biomarkers (myeloperoxidase, metalloproteinase-9, soluble CD40 ligand, pregnancy-associated plasma protein A, choline, ischemia-modified albumin, unbound free fatty acids, glycogen phosphorylase isoenzyme BB, and placental growth factor) have demonstrated promise and need to be more thoroughly evaluated for commercial development for implementation into routine clinical and laboratory practice. Summary: Specifications that have been addressed for cardiac troponins and natriuretic peptides will need to be addressed with the same scrutiny for the biomarkers discussed in this review. They include validating analytical imprecision and detection limits, calibrator characterization, assay specificity and standardization, preanalytical issues, and appropriate reference interval studies. Crossing boundaries from research to clinical application will require replication in multiple settings and experimental evidence supporting a pathophysiologic role and, ideally, interventional trials demonstrating that monitoring single or multiple biomarkers improves outcomes.

We aim to prospectively validate the diagnostic accuracy of the recently developed 0-h/1-h algorithm, using high-sensitivity cardiac troponin T (hs-cTnT) for the early rule-out and rule-in of acute myocardial infarction. We enrolled patients presenting with suspected acute myocardial infarction and recent (<6 hours) onset of symptoms to the emergency department in a global multicenter diagnostic study. Hs-cTnT (Roche Diagnostics) and sensitive cardiac troponin I (Siemens Healthcare) were measured at presentation and after 1 hour, 2 hours, and 4 to 14 hours in a central laboratory. Patient triage according to the predefined hs-cTnT 0-hour/1-hour algorithm (hs-cTnT below 12 ng/L and Δ1 hour below 3 ng/L to rule out; hs-cTnT at least 52 ng/L or Δ1 hour at least 5 ng/L to rule in; remaining patients to the "observational zone") was compared against a centrally adjudicated final diagnosis by 2 independent cardiologists (reference standard). The final diagnosis was based on all available information, including coronary angiography and echocardiography results, follow-up data, and serial measurements of sensitive cardiac troponin I, whereas adjudicators remained blinded to hs-cTnT. Among 1,282 patients enrolled, acute myocardial infarction was the final diagnosis for 213 (16.6%) patients. Applying the hs-cTnT 0-hour/1-hour algorithm, 813 (63.4%) patients were classified as rule out, 184 (14.4%) were classified as rule in, and 285 (22.2%) were triaged to the observational zone. This resulted in a negative predictive value and sensitivity for acute myocardial infarction of 99.1% (95% confidence interval [CI] 98.2% to 99.7%) and 96.7% (95% CI 93.4% to 98.7%) in the rule-out zone (7 patients with false-negative results), a positive predictive value and specificity for acute myocardial infarction of 77.2% (95% CI 70.4% to 83.0%) and 96.1% (95% CI 94.7% to 97.2%) in the rule-in zone, and a prevalence of acute myocardial infarction of 22.5% in the observational zone. The hs-cTnT 0-hour/1-hour algorithm performs well for early rule-out and rule-in of acute myocardial infarction.

Background: The European Society of Cardiology/American College of Cardiology Committee for the Redefinition of Myocardial Infarction (MI) has recommended that an increased cardiac troponin should be defined as a measurement above the 99th percentile value of the reference group. A total imprecision (CV) at the decision limit of ≤10% is recommended. However, peer-reviewed data on assay imprecision are lacking. The purpose of this study was to construct the clinically relevant imprecision profiles for each of the commercially available cardiac troponin assays. Pools of human sera containing cardiac troponin concentrations around the MI decision limit were assessed to identify the lowest concentration associated with a 10% CV. Methods: Eight serum pools targeting different concentrations of cardiac troponin (I and T) were prepared and stored at −70 °C until usage. The cardiac troponin measurement protocol consisted of two replicates per specimen per run, and one run per day for 20 days, using two reagent lots and three calibrations. Manufacturers of each cardiac troponin assay directly performed the measurements. Data analysis for each assay was centralized and performed according to the NCCLS EP5-A guideline. Results: The lowest concentrations (μg/L) providing a 10% CV were as follows: AxSYM, 1.22; ACS:180, 0.37; Centaur, 0.33; Immuno 1, 0.34; Access, 0.06; Vidas, 0.36; Liaison, 0.065; Dimension, 0.26; Opus, 0.90; Stratus CS, 0.10; Immulite, 0.32; Vitros ECi, 0.44; Elecsys, 0.04; AIA 21, 0.09. Conclusion: No cardiac troponin assay was able to achieve the 10% CV recommendation at the 99th percentile reference limit defined by the manufacturer.

Background: Reference intervals for serum creatinine remain relevant despite the current emphasis on the use of the estimated glomerular filtration rate for assessing renal function. Many studies on creatinine reference values have been published in the last 20 years. Using criteria derived from published IFCC documents, we sought to identify universally applicable reference intervals for creatinine via a systematic review of the literature.Methods: Studies were selected for inclusion in the systematic review only if the following criteria were met: (a) reference individuals were selected using an “a priori” selection scheme, (b) preanalytical conditions were adequately described; (c) traceability of the produced results to the isotope dilution–mass spectrometry (IDMS) reference method was demonstrated experimentally, and (d) the collected data received adequate statistical treatment.Results: Of 37 reports dealing specifically with serum creatinine reference values, only 1 report with pediatric data and 5 reports with adult data met these criteria. The primary reason for exclusion of most papers was an inadequate demonstration of measurement traceability. Based on the data of the selected studies, we have collated recommended reference intervals for white adults and children.Conclusion: Laboratories using methods producing traceable results to IDMS can apply the selected reference intervals for serum creatinine in evaluating white individuals.