With increasing demand for meat and dairy products, the volume of wastewater generated from the livestock industry has become a significant environmental concern. The treatment of livestock wastewater (LWW) is a challenging process that involves removing nutrients, organic matter, pathogens, and other pollutants from livestock manure and urine. In response to this challenge, researchers have developed and investigated different biological, physical, and chemical treatment technologies that perform better upon optimization. Optimization of LWW handling processes can help improve the efficacy and sustainability of treatment systems as well as minimize environmental impacts and associated costs. Response surface methodology (RSM) as an optimization approach can effectively optimize operational parameters that affect process performance. This review article summarizes the main steps of RSM, recent applications of RSM in LWW treatment, highlights the advantages and limitations of this technique, and provides recommendations for future research and practice, including its cost-effectiveness, accuracy, and ability to improve treatment efficiency.

Dairy wastewater (DW) contains a high concentration of organic and inorganic pollutants. In recent years, extensive research has been conducted to develop more efficient techniques for the treatment of DW. Electrochemical advanced oxidation processes (EAOPs) have gained significant attention among the various treatment approaches. EAOPs rely on electrochemical generation of hydroxyl radicals (•OH) which are considered highly potent oxidizing compounds for the degradation of pollutants in DW. In this paper, we provide an overview of the treatment of DW using various EAOPs, including anodic oxidation (AO), electro-Fenton (EF), photo electro-Fenton (PEF), and solar photo electro-Fenton (SPEF) processes, both individually and in combination with other techniques. Additionally, we discuss the reactor design and operating parameters employed in EAOPs. The variation in degradation efficiency is due to different oxidizing agents produced in specific approaches and their pollutant degradation abilities. In AO process, •OH radicals generated on electrode surfaces are influenced by electrode material and current density, while EF procedures use Fe²⁺ to create oxidizing agents both on electrodes and in the DW solution, with degradation mechanisms being affected by Fe²⁺, pH, and current density; additionally, PEF and SPEF approaches enhance oxidizing component production and pollutant degradation using ultraviolet (UV) light. Integration of EAOPs with other biological processes can enhance the pollutant removal efficiency of the treatment system. There is a scope of further research to exhibit the effectiveness of EAOPs for DW treatment in large scale implementation.