Guilherme Caetano

Dr. Guilherme Caetano

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

9Years (2018-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 February 2020 in International Journal of Experimental Pathology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
DMDaniela S. Masson‐Meyers
Daniela S. Masson‐Meyers
TAThiago Andrade
Thiago Andrade
GCGuilherme Caetano
Guilherme Caetano
FGFrancielle R. Guimaraes
Francielle R. Guimaraes
MLMarcel Nani Leite
Marcel Nani Leite
MFMaria Lucia Frade
Maria Lucia Frade
Summary: Wound healing studies are intricate, mainly because of the multifaceted nature of the wound environment and the complexity of the healing process, which integrates a variety of cells and repair phases, including inflammation, proliferation, reepithelialization and remodelling. There are a variety of possible preclinical models, such as in mice, rabbits and pigs, which can be used to mimic acute or impaired for example, diabetic and nutrition‐related wounds. These can be induced by many different techniques, with excision or incision being the most common. After determining a suitable model for a study, investigators need to select appropriate and reproducible methods that will allow the monitoring of the wound progression over time. The assessment can be performed by non‐invasive protocols such as wound tracing, photographic documentation (including image analysis), biophysical techniques and/or by invasive protocols that will require wound biopsies. In this article, we provide an overview of some of the most often needed and used: (a) preclinical/animal models including incisional, excisional, burn and impaired wounds; (b) methods to evaluate the healing progression such as wound healing rate, wound analysis by image, biophysical assessment, histopathological, immunological and biochemical assays. The aim is to help researchers during the design and execution of their wound healing studies.

5 January 2021 in Bio-Design and Manufacturing
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
ESEdney P. e Silva
Edney P. e Silva
Boyang HuangBoyang Huang
Boyang Huang
JHJúlia Venturini Helaehil
Júlia Venturini Helaehil
PNPaulo Roberto Nalesso
Paulo Roberto Nalesso
LBLeonardo Bagne
Leonardo Bagne
GCGuilherme Caetano
Guilherme Caetano
Critical bone defects are considered one of the major clinical challenges in reconstructive bone surgery. The combination of 3D printed conductive scaffolds and exogenous electrical stimulation (ES) is a potential favorable approach for bone tissue repair. In this study, 3D conductive scaffolds made with biocompatible and biodegradable polycaprolactone (PCL) and multi-walled carbon nanotubes (MWCNTs) were produced using the extrusion-based additive manufacturing to treat large calvary bone defects in rats. Histology results show that the use of PCL/MWCNTs scaffolds and ES contributes to thicker and increased bone tissue formation within the bone defect. Angiogenesis and mineralization are also significantly promoted using high concentration of MWCNTs (3 wt%) and ES. Moreover, scaffolds favor the tartrate-resistant acid phosphatase (TRAP) positive cell formation, while the addition of MWCNTs seems to inhibit the osteoclastogenesis but present limited effects on the osteoclast functionalities (receptor activator of nuclear factor κβ ligand (RANKL) and osteoprotegerin (OPG) expressions). The use of ES promotes the osteoclastogenesis and RANKL expressions, showing a dominant effect in the bone remodeling process. These results indicate that the combination of 3D printed conductive PCL/MWCNTs scaffold and ES is a promising strategy to treat critical bone defects and provide a cue to establish an optimal protocol to use conductive scaffolds and ES for bone tissue engineering.

25 December 2021 in Polymers
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
JHJúlia Venturini Helaehil
Júlia Venturini Helaehil
CLCarina Basqueira Lourenço
Carina Basqueira Lourenço
Boyang HuangBoyang Huang
Boyang Huang
LHLuiza Venturini Helaehil
Luiza Venturini Helaehil
ICIsaque Xavier de Camargo
Isaque Xavier de Camargo
GCGuilherme Caetano
Guilherme Caetano
Critical bone defects are a major clinical challenge in reconstructive bone surgery. Polycaprolactone (PCL) mixed with bioceramics, such as hydroxyapatite (HA) and tricalcium phosphate (TCP), create composite scaffolds with improved biological recognition and bioactivity. Electrical stimulation (ES) aims to compensate the compromised endogenous electrical signals and to stimulate cell proliferation and differentiation. We investigated the effects of composite scaffolds (PCL with HA; and PCL with β-TCP) and the use of ES on critical bone defects in Wistar rats using eight experimental groups: untreated, ES, PCL, PCL/ES, HA, HA/ES, TCP, and TCP/ES. The investigation was based on histomorphometry, immunohistochemistry, and gene expression analysis. The vascular area was greater in the HA/ES group on days 30 and 60. Tissue mineralization was greater in the HA, HA/ES, and TCP groups at day 30, and TCP/ES at day 60. Bmp-2 gene expression was higher in the HA, TCP, and TCP/ES groups at day 30, and in the TCP/ES and PCL/ES groups at day 60. Runx-2, Osterix, and Osteopontin gene expression were also higher in the TCP/ES group at day 60. These results suggest that scaffolds printed with PCL and TCP, when paired with electrical therapy application, improve bone regeneration.

28 September 2018 in Journal of Biomedical Materials Research Part B: Applied Biomaterials
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
JFJosé Hyczy Fonseca
José Hyczy Fonseca
LBLeonardo Bagne
Leonardo Bagne
DMDamaris Helena Meneghetti
Damaris Helena Meneghetti
GSGláucia Maria Tech dos Santos
Gláucia Maria Tech dos Santos
MEMarcelo Augusto Marcelo Marretto Esquisatto
Marcelo Augusto Marcelo Marretto Esquisatto
FMFernanda Aparecida Sampaio Mendonça
Fernanda Aparecida Sampaio Mendonça

18 May 2021 in Journal of Biomedical Materials Research Part B: Applied Biomaterials
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
LBLeonardo Bagne
Leonardo Bagne
MOMaraiara A. Oliveira
Maraiara A. Oliveira
APAmanda T. Pereira
Amanda T. Pereira
GCGuilherme Caetano
Guilherme Caetano
COCamila A. Oliveira
Camila A. Oliveira
MSMilton Santamaria‐Jr
Milton Santamaria‐Jr

1 December 2021 in Bioprinting
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PNPaulo Roberto Lopes Nalesso
Paulo Roberto Lopes Nalesso
WWWeiguang Wang
Weiguang Wang
YHYanhao Hou
Yanhao Hou
LBLeonardo Bagne
Leonardo Bagne
APAmanda Tavares Pereira
Amanda Tavares Pereira
GCGuilherme Caetano
Guilherme Caetano