The predictive accuracy of the traditional staging system for cancer, the American Joint Committee on Cancer/Union Internationale Centre le Cancer (AJCC/UICC) classification of malignant tumors, is based on disease progression as a tumor cell-autonomous process, regardless the effects of the host immune response. The natural history of a tumor includes different phases of growth, migration and invasion. During these phases, tumor cells interact with their microenvironment and are influenced by signals from stromal, endothelial, inflammatory and immune cells. Indeed, tumors are often infiltrated by defensive cells such as lymphocytes, macrophages or mast cells and it has been shown extensively that lymphocytes may control cancer outcome, as evidenced in several human malignancies. Increasing evidence suggests that cancer progression is strongly influenced by host immune response, which is represented by immune cell infiltrates. The T-lymphocyte-based immunoscore (IS) has proved to be a prognostic factor in human malignancies such as colon, pancreas and lung cancer, hepatocellular carcinoma, melanoma and even brain metastases. Although the IS was initially established to evaluate the prognosis of stage I/II/III colon cancer patients, its association with clinical outcomes and survival has been shown in other malignancies. The aim of this review is to analyze the association of IS with prognosis, survival and response to therapy in different tumor types.

An earlier analysis of the PEARL phase III study showed that palbociclib plus endocrine therapy (ET) does not improve progression-free survival (PFS) over capecitabine in aromatase inhibitor-resistant, hormone receptor-positive/human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative metastatic breast cancer (MBC) patients. Here, we report the final overall survival (OS) analysis. Postmenopausal patients (N = 601) were randomized 1:1 to capecitabine or palbociclib plus ET (exemestane, Cohort 1; fulvestrant, Cohort 2). OS was analysed in Cohort 2, the wild-type ESR1 population and the overall population. Additionally, we analysed subsequent systemic therapies and explored PFS2 (time from randomization to the end of the first subsequent therapy/death). OS was 31.1 months for palbociclib plus fulvestrant and 32.8 months for capecitabine (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR] 1.10, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.81-1.50, P = 0.550). In the wild-type ESR1 population, OS was 37.2 months for palbociclib plus ET and 34.8 months for capecitabine (aHR 1.06, 95% CI 0.81-1.37, P = 0.683). In OS analyses, no subgroup showed superiority for palbociclib plus ET over capecitabine. OS in the overall population was 32.6 months for palbociclib plus ET and 30.9 months for capecitabine (P = 0.995). Subsequent systemic therapy was given to 79.8% and 82.9% of patients with palbociclib plus ET and capecitabine, respectively. Median PFS2 was similar between study arms (Cohort 2, P = 0.941; wild-type ESR1 population, P = 0.827). No new safety findings were observed. Palbociclib plus ET did not show a statistically superior OS compared to capecitabine in MBC patients progressing on aromatase inhibitors. NCT02028507 (ClinTrials.gov), 2013-003170-27 (EudraCT).

Purpose: This phase II study investigated daily or weekly sapanisertib (a selective dual inhibitor of mTOR complexes 1 and 2) in combination with fulvestrant. Patients and Methods: Postmenopausal women with estrogen receptor–positive (ER+)/HER2-negative (HER2−) advanced or metastatic breast cancer following progression during/after aromatase inhibitor treatment were randomized to receive fulvestrant 500 mg (28-day treatment cycles), fulvestrant plus sapanisertib 4 mg daily, or fulvestrant plus sapanisertib 30 mg weekly, until progressive disease, unacceptable toxicity, consent withdrawal, or study completion. Results: Among 141 enrolled patients, baseline characteristics were balanced among treatment arms, including prior cyclin-dependent kinase-4/6 (CDK4/6) inhibitor treatment in 33% to 35% of patients. Median progression-free survival (PFS; primary endpoint) was 3.5 months in the single-agent fulvestrant arm, compared with 7.2 months for fulvestrant plus sapanisertib daily [HR, 0.77; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.47–1.26] and 5.6 months for fulvestrant plus sapanisertib weekly (HR, 0.88; 95% CI, 0.53–1.45). The greatest PFS benefits were seen in patients who had previously received CDK4/6 inhibitors. The most common adverse events were nausea, vomiting, and hyperglycemia, all occurring more frequently in the combination therapy arms. Treatment discontinuation due to adverse events occurred more frequently in the two combination therapy arms than with single-agent fulvestrant (32% and 36% vs. 4%, respectively). Conclusions: Fulvestrant plus sapanisertib daily/weekly resulted in numerically longer PFS in patients with ER+/HER2− advanced or metastatic breast cancer, compared with single-agent fulvestrant. The combination was associated with increased toxicity. Further development of sapanisertib using these dosing schedules in this setting is not supported by these data.

Background: The incidence and prognosis of high-grade gliomas differ according to histopathological and molecular features. The WHO 2021 CNS classification emphasized IDH status, but historical cohorts often lacked systematic molecular profiling. Methods: We conducted a retrospective population-based study including adult patients diagnosed with IDH-wildtype glioblastoma or IDH-mutant astrocytoma in a Spanish tertiary center (2011–2021). Incidence trends and survival outcomes were analyzed according to treatment modality and sex. Results: A total of 1057 patients were included: 530 (50.1%) with IDH-wildtype glioblastoma and 137 (13%) with IDH-mutant astrocytoma. Incidence of both subtypes significantly increased during the study period (p < 0.01). Median overall survival (OS) was 12.3 months for IDH-wildtype glioblastoma and 38.4 months for IDH-mutant astrocytoma. Multimodal therapy (surgery, radiotherapy, chemotherapy) significantly improved OS and progression-free survival (PFS) in both subgroups (p < 0.001). Male sex was associated with longer OS in both tumor types (p < 0.05). Conclusions: IDH-wildtype glioblastoma shows persistently poor outcomes despite increasing incidence, while IDH-mutant astrocytoma demonstrates better survival, particularly in male patients and those receiving multimodal therapy. These findings reflect real-world practice and provide epidemiological and survival data from Southern Europe to guide future clinical and public health strategies.

Purpose: CB307 is a trispecific variable heavy-chain antibody fragment against prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA), CD137, and human serum albumin. It is designed to mitigate hepatotoxicity by activating T cells only in PSMA-positive tumors and to increase drug half-life through albumin binding. This phase I study investigated the safety and tolerability of CB307 as monotherapy or in combination with pembrolizumab. Patients and Methods: Patients who were heavily pretreated with PSMA-positive solid tumors were enrolled in the dose-escalation phase of CB307 monotherapy. The additional safety and efficacy of CB307 were assessed in the CB307 monotherapy expansion cohort and in combination with pembrolizumab. Results: CB307 was administered to 75 patients. CB307 was given once every 7 days as monotherapy (N = 50) or in combination with pembrolizumab (N = 25). Two dose-limiting toxicities (grade 3 transient transaminitis) were observed. A total of three grade 3 transaminitis events (one in the monotherapy cohort and two in the combination cohort) were observed, and none involved bilirubin elevation. Durable RECIST responses were observed in two patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer enrolled in the 800 mg CB307 monotherapy and in one patient in the combination cohort (overall response rates: 11.1% and 7.1%, respectively). A disease control rate (DCR) of 50% was observed in patients enrolled in the 800 mg CB307 monotherapy cohort and 42.9% in the combination cohort. In a post hoc analysis, the response was numerically better in patients who had not received chemotherapy in the 6 months prior to starting CB307 (ORR = 20%, DCR = 60% vs. ORR = 0%, DCR = 37.5%). CB307 induces cytotoxic cell expansion in tumors and PD-L1 expression. Conclusions: CB307 was well tolerated as a monotherapy and in combination with pembrolizumab, and tumor responses were observed in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer.