Xiao Wang

Mrs. Xiao Wang


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

5Years (2022-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 February 2023 in Journal of Mountain Science
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
DWDi Wang
Di Wang
Ronghao YangRonghao Yang
Ronghao Yang
XWXiao Wang
Xiao Wang
ALAnd Shaoda Li
And Shaoda Li
JTJunxiang Tan
Junxiang Tan
XYXiaoxia Yang
Xiaoxia Yang

28 August 2022 in Remote Sensing
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
DWDi Wang
Di Wang
Ronghao YangRonghao Yang
Ronghao Yang
HLHanhu Liu
Hanhu Liu
HHHaiqing He
Haiqing He
JTJunxiang Tan
Junxiang Tan
XWXiao Wang
Xiao Wang
Landcover classification is an important application in remote sensing, but it is always a challenge to distinguish different features with similar characteristics or large-scale differences. Some deep learning networks, such as UperNet, PSPNet, and DANet, use pyramid pooling and attention mechanisms to improve their abilities in multi-scale features extraction. However, due to the neglect of low-level features contained in the underlying network and the information differences between feature maps, it is difficult to identify small-scale objects. Thus, we propose a novel image segmentation network, named HFENet, for mining multi-level semantic information. Like the UperNet, HFENet adopts a top-down horizontal connection architecture while includes two improved modules, the HFE and the MFF. According to the characteristics of different levels of semantic information, HFE module reconstructs the feature extraction part by introducing an attention mechanism and pyramid pooling module to fully mine semantic information. With the help of a channel attention mechanism, MFF module up-samples and re-weights the feature maps to fuse them and enhance the expression ability of multi-scale features. Ablation studies and comparative experiments between HFENet and seven state-of-the-art models (U-Net, DeepLabv3+, PSPNet, FCN, UperNet, DANet and SegNet) are conducted with a self-labeled GF-2 remote sensing image dataset (MZData) and two open datasets landcover.ai and WHU building dataset. The results show that HFENet on three datasets with six evaluation metrics (mIoU, FWIoU, PA, mP, mRecall and mF1) are better than the other models and the mIoU is improved 7.41–10.60% on MZData, 1.17–11.57% on WHU building dataset and 0.93–4.31% on landcover.ai. HFENet can perform better in the task of refining the semantic segmentation of remote sensing images.

15 January 2024 in Remote Sensing
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
XWXiao Wang
Xiao Wang
DWDi Wang
Di Wang
XLXinyue Li
Xinyue Li
ZMZhang Mengmeng
Zhang Mengmeng
SCSizhi Cheng
Sizhi Cheng
XHXinyi Huang
Xinyi Huang
Considering the great time and labor consumption involved in conventional hazard assessment methods in compiling landslide inventory, the construction of a transferable landslide susceptibility prediction model is crucial. This study employs UAV images as data sources to interpret the typical alpine valley area of Beichuan County. Eight environmental factors including a digital elevation model (DEM) are extracted to establish a pixel-wise dataset, along with interpreted landslide data. Two landslide susceptibility models were built, each with a deep neural network (DNN) and a support vector machine (SVM) as the learner, and the DNN model was determined to have the best pre-training performance (accuracy = 88.6%, precision = 91.3%, recall = 94.8%, specificity = 87.8%, F1-score = 93.0%, and area under curve = 0.943), with higher parameters in comparison to the SVM model (accuracy = 77.1%, precision = 80.9%, recall = 87.8%, specificity = 73.9%, F1-score = 84.2%, and area under curve = 0.878). The susceptibility model of Beichuan County is then transferred to Mao County (which has no available dataset) to realize cross-regional landslide susceptibility prediction. The results suggest that the model predictions accomplish susceptibility zoning principles and that the DNN model can more precisely distinguish between high and very-high susceptibility areas in relation to the SVM model.