Daniel G. Eichberg

Dr. Daniel G. Eichberg


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

12Years (2015-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 January 2021 in Journal of Neurosurgery
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
DEDaniel G. Eichberg
Daniel G. Eichberg
ASAshish H. Shah
Ashish H. Shah
LDLong Di
Long Di
ASAlexa M. Semonche
Alexa M. Semonche
GJGeorge Jimsheleishvili
George Jimsheleishvili
MIMichael E. Ivan
Michael E. Ivan
OBJECTIVE: In some centers where brain tumor surgery is performed, the opportunity for expert intraoperative neuropathology consultation is lacking. Consequently, surgeons may not have access to the highest quality diagnostic histological data to inform surgical decision-making. Stimulated Raman histology (SRH) is a novel technology that allows for rapid acquisition of diagnostic histological images at the bedside. METHODS: The authors performed a prospective blinded cohort study of 82 consecutive patients undergoing resection of CNS tumors to compare diagnostic time and accuracy of SRH simulation to the gold standard, i.e., frozen and permanent section diagnosis. Diagnostic accuracy was determined by concordance of SRH-simulated intraoperative pathology consultation with a blinded board-certified neuropathologist, with official frozen section and permanent section results. RESULTS: Overall, the mean time to diagnosis was 30.5 ± 13.2 minutes faster (p < 0.0001) for SRH simulation than for frozen section, with similar diagnostic correlation: 91.5% (κ = 0.834, p < 0.0001) between SRH simulation and permanent section, and 91.5% between frozen and permanent section (κ = 0.894, p < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: SRH-simulated intraoperative pathology consultation was significantly faster and equally accurate as frozen section.

27 March 2020 in Journal of Neuro-Oncology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
DEDaniel G. Eichberg
Daniel G. Eichberg
LDLong Di
Long Di
AMAlexis A. Morell
Alexis A. Morell
ASAshish H. Shah
Ashish H. Shah
ASAlexa M. Semonche
Alexa M. Semonche
MIMichael E. Ivan
Michael E. Ivan

1 January 2015 in Surgical Neurology International
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDParviz Dolati
Parviz Dolati
AGAbdulkerim GÖKOĞLU
Abdulkerim GÖKOĞLU
DEDaniel G. Eichberg
Daniel G. Eichberg
AZAmir Zamani
Amir Zamani
AGAlexandra Golby
Alexandra Golby
OAOssama Al-Mefty
Ossama Al-Mefty
Skull base tumors frequently encase or invade adjacent normal neurovascular structures. For this reason, optimal tumor resection with incomplete knowledge of patient anatomy remains a challenge. To determine the accuracy and utility of image-based preoperative segmentation in skull base tumor resections, we performed a prospective study. Ten patients with skull base tumors underwent preoperative 3T magnetic resonance imaging, which included thin section three-dimensional (3D) space T2, 3D time of flight, and magnetization-prepared rapid acquisition gradient echo sequences. Imaging sequences were loaded in the neuronavigation system for segmentation and preoperative planning. Five different neurovascular landmarks were identified in each case and measured for accuracy using the neuronavigation system. Each segmented neurovascular element was validated by manual placement of the navigation probe, and errors of localization were measured. Strong correspondence between image-based segmentation and microscopic view was found at the surface of the tumor and tumor-normal brain interfaces in all cases. The accuracy of the measurements was 0.45 ± 0.21 mm (mean ± standard deviation). This information reassured the surgeon and prevented vascular injury intraoperatively. Preoperative segmentation of the related cranial nerves was possible in 80% of cases and helped the surgeon localize involved cranial nerves in all cases. Image-based preoperative vascular and neural element segmentation with 3D reconstruction is highly informative preoperatively and could increase the vigilance of neurosurgeons for preventing neurovascular injury during skull base surgeries. Additionally, the accuracy found in this study is superior to previously reported measurements. This novel preliminary study is encouraging for future validation with larger numbers of patients.

1 December 2019 in World Neurosurgery
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
DEDaniel G. Eichberg
Daniel G. Eichberg
LDLong Di
Long Di
ASAshish H. Shah
Ashish H. Shah
ELEvan Luther
Evan Luther
ARAngela M. Richardson
Angela M. Richardson
RKRicardo J. Komotar
Ricardo J. Komotar

12 December 2019 in Operative Neurosurgery
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
DEDaniel G. Eichberg
Daniel G. Eichberg
SMSimon A Menaker
Simon A Menaker
WJWalter J Jermakowicz
Walter J Jermakowicz
ASAshish H Shah
Ashish H Shah
ELEvan M Luther
Evan M Luther
Michael E. IvanMichael E. Ivan
Michael E. Ivan
BACKGROUND: Prior treatment with magnetic resonance-guided, laser-induced thermal therapy (LITT) is widely assumed not to be a contraindication for further treatment of brain lesions, including further iterations of LITT. However, the safety and efficacy of repeat LITT treatments have never been formally investigated. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate treatment with multiple iterations of LITT. METHODS: All patients treated with LITT at least twice at our institution were included in the study. Outcomes and neurological examinations from before and after surgery were retrospectively examined from clinic notes. Perilesonal edema was determined at various timepoints using volumetric data derived from manual tracings of fluid-attenuated inversion recovery (FLAIR) enhancement on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Finally, a literature review of prior cases of repeat LITT was performed. RESULTS: A total of 9 patients underwent 18 treatments with LITT; all but 1 of whom were treated for metastatic brain lesions. One patient had a transient cerebrospinal fluid leak, whereas a second patient had a superficial wound infection, both of which resolved with standard medical care. The remaining 7 patients tolerated all LITT procedures without complication. Analysis of perilesional edema volume demonstrated a correlation with the amount of energy delivered during LITT. Literature review found 5 published papers describing 9 patients who underwent LITT more than once, the majority of whom tolerated repeat LITT well. CONCLUSION: LITT is a safe and promising treatment modality and may be used multiple times without issue. There appears to be an association between the amount of energy delivered during a LITT session and the degree of postoperative perilesional edema.

1 May 2018 in Cureus
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
DEDaniel G. Eichberg
Daniel G. Eichberg
SASheikh C. Ali
Sheikh C. Ali
SBSimon Buttrick
Simon Buttrick
Ricardo J. KomotarRicardo J. Komotar
Ricardo J. Komotar
Background: In cranial neurosurgery, primary watertight dural closure is the standard method of post-craniotomy dural repair. However, cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) leaks, pseudomeningoceles, postoperative infections, and dural scarring are possible complications, even when a meticulous technique is implemented. For this reason, materials that enhance the dura's ability to create a watertight seal, inhibit the inflammatory response, and prevent disease transmission are sought. Dehydrated amniotic membrane (DAM) allograft appears to facilitate these properties, as studies have shown that it improves wound healing, prevents scar tissue formation, promotes epithelialization, and inhibits bacterial growth. We detail the use of a DAM allograft to augment dural closures for craniotomies. Methods: We conducted a pilot study, retrospectively reviewing our institution's database of craniotomies that utilized DAM to supplement dural closure. Results: A total of 122 cases, including 18 initial craniotomies for infratentorial lesions, 102 initial craniotomies for supratentorial lesions, one re-do craniotomy for supratentorial recurrent glioma, and one craniotomy for an anterior skull base schwannoma used a DAM allograft to augment dural closure. Only one complication occurred (0.8% complication rate), which was a superficial wound infection requiring washout without craniectomy. No CSF leaks occurred. Conclusions: This pilot study demonstrates that dehydrated amniotic membrane allograft can be safely utilized as an adjunct during dural closures for craniotomies.