To compare changes in intraocular pressure (IOP) during femtosecond laser pretreatment of cataract between glaucomatous eyes and nonglaucomatous eyes. Launceston Eye Institute and Launceston Eye Hospital, Launceston, Australia. Nonrandomized interventional prospective case series. Patients with clinically stable primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG) having femtosecond laser pretreatment were compared with a concurrent cohort of patients with healthy eyes having the same procedure. Pretreatment was performed using a fluid-filled optical docking system (Liquid Optics Interface). With the patient supine, the IOP was measured at 4 time points using a rebound tonometer (Icare Pro). The study comprised 143 eyes of 97 patients. Forty-three eyes (30.1%) had documented glaucoma. The mean baseline IOP was 20.2 mm Hg ± 4.2 (SD) in glaucomatous eyes and 18.9 ± 4.0 mm Hg in nonglaucomatous eyes (P = .06). The mean change in IOP values between each time frame and baseline was as follows: vacuum-on, 13.8 ± 9.9 mm Hg and 11.1 ± 6.9 mm Hg, respectively (P = .06); after treatment, 17.4 ± 7.4 mm Hg and 14.1 ± 7.2 mm Hg, respectively (P = .014); after undocking of vacuum, 9.9 ± 5.4 mm Hg and 8.7 ± 5.7 mm Hg, respectively (P = .24). Femtosecond pretreatment caused a greater transient rise in IOP after treatment and a higher residual IOP after vacuum undocking in glaucomatous eyes than in nonglaucomatous eyes. This is well tolerated short term; however, long-term implications for eyes with glaucoma are unknown at present. No author has a financial or proprietary interest in any material or method mentioned.

Little is known about interprofessional practice (IPP) and interprofessional learning (IPL) in rural health services, despite national funding and continuing emphasis on increasing students’ clinical placements in rural areas. This short paper outlines a study in Tasmania, Australia, which investigated how and under what contexts and conditions IPP and IPL occur in rural clinical settings, and the enabling factors and strategies that promote this learning and practice. This study employed a mixed method design comprising focus group discussions and a survey involving health professionals from two rural health services. The findings demonstrate that formal and informal arrangements, the collaborative nature of small, close-knit healthcare teams and patient-centred models of care employed in rural practice settings, provide ideal contexts for IPP and IPL. The study has implications for promoting organisational readiness for IPP and IPL and harnessing the potential of rural services to promote and develop students’ interprofessional capability.

Journal of Medical Internet Research - International Scientific Journal for Medical Research, Information and Communication on the Internet