Although tacrolimus is useful as an induction therapy in patients with ulcerative colitis (UC), information regarding the long-term outcome after tacrolimus therapy is insufficient. The aim of this study was to evaluate the clinical significance of the pretreatment neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) as a prognostic factor in patients with UC receiving tacrolimus, to aid treatment selection. Patients with moderate-to-severe active UC who received oral tacrolimus induction therapy and subsequent immunomodulatory maintenance therapy at our hospital between 2009 and 2017 and who showed clinical response at week 12, were retrospectively enrolled. Cox regression analysis was conducted to study the prognostic role of the pretreatment NLR. The combined impact of the NLR and other known prognostic factors was investigated with multivariate regression. Among 45 patients included in this study, 21 patients experienced relapse during a median follow-up period of 16.6 months. Multivariate Cox regression analysis identified the pretreatment NLR (hazard ratio [HR]: 0.82, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.72–0.94, P < 0.01) and the use of immunomodulators at the start of tacrolimus treatment (HR: 0.18, 95% CI: 0.05–0.66, P = 0.01) as independent predictors of clinical relapse. The pretreatment NLR is an independent prognostic factor in patients with UC treated with tacrolimus.

The coronavirus disease (COVID-19) pandemic has had a considerable impact on the global healthcare system and potentially the clinical course of patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). Although IBD is a chronic disease, its therapy (except steroid therapy) does not increase the risk of contracting or aggravating COVID-19. However, the clinical course of patients is significantly influenced by environmental factors. Social restrictions due to the pandemic or the fear of contracting the virus have influenced lifestyle and psychosocial behaviors that may worsen the clinical course of patients with IBD. This narrative literature review summarizes the current evidence on the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the lifestyle and psychosocial behaviors of patients with IBD. The COVID-19 pandemic negatively affected the lifestyle and psychosocial behaviors of patients with IBD. Furthermore, patients with IBD failed to maintain medication adherence, thus affecting the clinical course of their condition.

Background/Aims: Treatment using tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α) inhibitors is one of the risk factors for active tuberculosis (TB) in patients with Crohn’s disease (CD). Biologics, such as ustekinumab (UST) and vedolizumab (VDZ), are less likely to cause opportunistic infections. However, large-scale studies for active TB and biologics other than TNF-α inhibitors are limited. We aimed to investigate the association between biologics and active TB utilizing a Japanese medical claims database. Methods: We analyzed retrospectively the association of the risk of active TB development with treatment using TNF-α inhibitors and other biologics (UST and VDZ) in patients with CD using the Japanese Medical Data Vision (MDV) database between April 2008 and June 2022. The durations of each biologic and biologic-free treatment were calculated for each patient. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed using the Cox proportional hazards model, with the utilization of biologics considered as time-dependent covariates. Results: We included 28,811 patients with CD in MDV database. Finally, 17,169 patients were analyzed. In total, 7,064 patients were categorized as biologic-naïve, while 10,105 were classified as biologic-experienced. Seventeen patients developed active TB, including 7 on infliximab, 5 on adalimumab, and 5 on no biologics. None of the patients treated with UST and VDZ developed active TB. Multivariate analysis suggested that TNF-α inhibitors were the risk factors for active TB (hazard ratio, 3.66; P= 0.020). Conclusions: TNF-α inhibitors, but not UST or VDZ, are risk factors for active TB in Japanese patients with CD.

Human herpesviruses (HHVs): herpes simplex virus (HSV) types 1 (HSV-1) and 2 (HSV-2), varicella-zoster virus (VZV), Epstein-Barr virus (EBV), cytomegalovirus (CMV), HHV-6, HHV-7, and HHV-8, are known to be part of a family of DNA viruses that cause several diseases in humans. In clinical practice of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), the complication of CMV enterocolitis, which is caused by CMV reactivation under disruption of intestinal barrier function, inflammation, or strong immunosuppressive therapy, is well known to affect the prognosis of disease. However, the relationship between other HHVs and IBD remains unclear. In the transplantation field, reactivation of other viruses, such as HHV-6, could cause colitis under immunosuppressed condition. Recent research revealed that combined infection of some HHVs could be a risk factor for colectomy in patients with ulcerative colitis. This suggests that it would be important to clarify HHV behavior in the treatment for patients with IBD, especially in those under immunosuppressive therapies. Looking at the relationship with recently emerged novel coronaviruses (SARS-CoV-2), there are reports describe that SARS-CoV-2 might induce reactivation of HSV-1, EBV, VZV (herpes zoster), and HHV-6/7. If SARS-CoV-2 infection becomes common, vigilance against HHV reactivation may become more crucial. In this review, we discuss the impact of HHVs in clinical practice of inflammatory bowel diseases, especially during the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic.

Background: The efficacy of 5-aminosalicylic acid (5-ASA) in combination with advanced therapies (ADTs), particularly ustekinumab (UST), for the treatment of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) remains unclear. Methods: This retrospective cohort analysis used data from the Medical Data Vision database, including patients with ulcerative colitis (UC) and Crohn’s disease (CD) who had initiated UST therapy. Cumulative UST continuation rates and factors associated with UST failure were analyzed, and post hoc subgroup analyses based on prior ADT use were conducted. Results: A total of 1971 patients with CD and 1284 patients with UC were included. Overall, the concomitant use of 5-ASA did not significantly affect UST failure in either CD or UC. Post hoc subgroup analysis suggested a protective effect of 5-ASA in ADT-naïve patients with CD or UC who had been previously exposed to ADT. Conclusions: 5-ASA did not provide a significant overall benefit when used in combination with UST for CD or UC. However, post hoc subgroup analyses indicated a potential role for 5-ASA in specific subgroups. Further studies are necessary to confirm these findings and explore personalized treatment strategies.