Ossification of the ligamentum flavum (OLF) is a disorder of heterotopic ossification of spinal ligaments and is the main cause of thoracic spinal canal stenosis. Previous studies suggested that miR-132-3p negatively regulates osteoblast differentiation. However, whether miR-132-3p is involved in the process of OLF has not been investigated. In this study, we investigated the effect of miR-132-3p and its target genes forkhead box O1 (FOXO1), growth differentiation factor 5 (GDF5) and SRY-box 6 (SOX6) on the osteogenic differentiation of ligamentum flavum (LF) cells. We demonstrated that miR-132-3p was down-regulated during the osteogenic differentiation of LF cells and negatively regulated the osteoblast differentiation. Further, miR-132-3p targeted FOXO1, GDF5 and SOX6 and down-regulated the protein expression of these genes. Meanwhile, FOXO1, GDF5 and SOX6 were up-regulated after osteogenic differentiation and the down-regulation of endogenous FOXO1, GDF5 or SOX6 suppressed the osteogenic differentiation of LF cells. In addition, we also found FOXO1, GDF5 and SOX6 expression in the ossification front of OLF samples. Overall, these results suggest that miR-132-3p inhibits the osteogenic differentiation of LF cells by targeting FOXO1, GDF5 and SOX6.
Study Design. Basic experimental study. Objective. To clarify the role of macrophages (Mϕs) in the osteogenic differentiation of ligamentum flavum (LF) cells. Summary of Background Data. Mϕs and secreted factors are involved in the regulation of cell osteogenic differentiation, and play an important role in the process of heterotopic ossification. Whether Mϕs are involved in the development of ossification of the ligamentum flavum (OLF) have not been reported. Methods. The expression of CD68+ Mϕs in ossified LF tissue was identified by immunohistochemical staining. THP-1 cells were polarized to M1 and M2, and identified by flow cytometry and immunofluorescence. The alkaline phosphatase activity and osteogenic differentiation-related gene expression in LF cells were evaluated following incubation with each Mϕs conditioned medium (CM). ELISA was used to detect the pro-inflammatory cytokines in the supernatants, and qPCR was used to detect the expression of the corresponding receptors in the LF cells after incubation with the CM. LF cells were induced with CM-M1 in the presence of neutralizing antibodies to further test whether cytokines secreted by M1 Mϕs impacted their osteogenic differentiation. Results. CD68+ Mϕs were found on the OLF samples. THP-1 cells were polarized into M1 and M2, and both M1 and M2 Mϕs promoted the osteogenic differentiation of LF cells. The concentrations of TNF-α, IL-1β, and IL-6 in M1 Mϕ supernatants were greater than those in M2, and greater levels of these cytokine receptors were observed in LF cells induced with CM-M1 than those with CM-M2. Osteogenic differentiation of LF cells induced by CM-M1 decreased after IL-6 was neutralized; however, not after IL-1β and TNF-α were neutralized. Conclusion. M1 Mϕ-derived IL-6 promotes the osteogenic differentiation of LF cells, which may be a pathway in which Mϕs regulate the osteogenic differentiation of LF cells. Level of Evidence: N/A
Musculoskeletal deficits are among the most common extra-intestinal manifestations and complications of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). This study aimed to identify crosstalk genes between IBD and osteoporosis (OP) and potential relationships between crosstalk and neutrophil extracellular traps (NETs)-related genes. Three common hub genes from different compared groups are actually the same, namely HDAC6, IL-8, and PPIF. ROC showed that the combined diagnostic value of HDAC6, IL-8, and PPIF was higher than each of the three key hub genes. Immune infiltration results showed that HDAC6 and IL-8 key genes negatively correlated with CD65 bright natural killer cells. USF1 was the common upstream TFs between HDAC6 and PPIF, and MYC was the common upstream TFs between IL-8 and PPIF in RegNetwork. Taken together, this study shows a linked mechanism between IBD and OP via NETs and crosstalk genes. These findings may show light on better diagnosis and treatment of IBD complicated with OP.
Background: M1 macrophages (Mφs) are involved in osteogenic differentiation of ligamentum flavum (LF) cells and play an important role in heterotopic ossification. However, the mechanism by which M1 Mφs influence osteogenic differentiation of LF cells has not been studied. Methods: The effect of conditioned medium including secretions of M1 Mφs (CM‐M1) on LF cells was analyzed by GeneChip profiling and ingenuity pathway analysis (IPA). THP‐1 cells were polarized into M1 Mφs and CM‐M1 was used to induce LF cells. In addition, LF cells were induced by CM‐M1 in the presence of cyclooxygenase 2 (COX‐2) inhibitors or oncostatin M (OSM)‐neutralizing antibodies. Based on the presence of OSM, knockout of OSMR or GP130 receptors, or addition of the Janus kinase 2 (JAK2) inhibitor AZD1480 or signal transducer and activator of transcription 3 (STAT3) inhibitor Stattic were examined for effects on osteogenic differentiation of LF cells. OSM secretion was quantified by ELISA, while qPCR and western blot were used to evaluate expression of osteogenic genes and receptor and signaling pathway‐related proteins, respectively. Results: GeneChip and IPA results indicate that the OSM signaling pathway and its downstream signaling molecules JAK2 and STAT3 are significantly activated. ELISA results indicate that OSM is highly expressed in cells treated with CM‐M1 and lowly expressed in cells treated with CM‐M1 and a COX‐2 inhibitor. Besides, CM‐M1 induces osteogenic differentiation of LF cells, which is weakened when COX‐2 inhibitors or OSM‐neutralizing antibody are added to it. Recombinant OSM could induce osteogenic differentiation of LF cells and upregulate expression of OSMR, GP130, phosphorylated (P)‐JAK2, and P‐STAT3. Upon knockdown of OSMR or GP130, or the addition of AZD1480 or Stattic, P‐JAK2 and P‐STAT3 expression were decreased and osteogenic differentiation was reduced. Conclusion: M1 Mφ‐derived OSM induces osteogenic differentiation of LF cells and the JAK2/STAT3 signaling pathway plays an important role.
Background: Tumor cells exhibit a heightened susceptibility to lysosomal-dependent cell death (LCD) compared to normal cells. However, the role of LCD-related genes (LCD-RGs) in Osteosarcoma (OS) remains unelucidated. This study aimed to elucidate the role of LCD-RGs and their mechanisms in OS using several existing OS related datasets, including TCGA-OS, GSE16088, GSE14359, GSE21257 and GSE162454. Results: Analysis identified a total of 8,629 DEGs1, 2,777 DEGs2 and 21 intersection genes. Importantly, two biomarkers (ATP6V0D1 and HDAC6) linked to OS prognosis were identified to establish the prognostic model. Significant differences in risk scores for OS survival were observed between high and low-risk cohorts. Additionally, scores of dendritic cells (DC), immature DCs and γδT cells differed significantly between the two risk cohorts. Cell annotations from GSE162454 encompassed eight types (myeloid cells, osteoblastic OS cells and plasma cells). ATP6V0D1 was found to be significantly over-expressed in myeloid cells and osteoclasts, while HDAC6 was under-expressed across all cell types. Moreover, single-cell trajectory mapping revealed that myeloid cells and osteoclasts differentiated first, underscoring their pivotal role in patients with OS. Furthermore, ATP6V0D1 expression progressively decreased with time. Conclusions: A new prognostic model for OS, associated with LCD-RGs, was developed and validated, offering a fresh perspective for exploring the association between LCD and OS.
16 July 2024 in Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research
Purpose: Oncostatin M (OSM) is involved in the regulation of osteogenic differentiation and has a major role in the development of heterotopic ossification. The role of OSM in osteogenic differentiation of tendon-derived stem cells (TDSCs) and its mechanism have not been reported. This study aim to investigate the role of OSM in osteogenic differentiation of TDSCs and study the mechanism. Methods: TDSCs were differentiated in osteogenic differentiation medium for 7 days. Recombinant OSM was added to the osteogenic differentiation medium for 7 and 14 days. The effect of Janus kinase 2 (JAK2) inhibitor AZD1480 and signal transducer and activator of transcription 3 (STAT3) inhibitor stattic in the presence of recombinant OSM on osteogenic differentiation of TDSCs was examined after differentiation for 7 and 14 days. Alkaline phosphatase and alizarin red staining were used to assess the effects on early and mid-stage osteogenic differentiation, respectively. Western blotting and qPCR were used to assess the expression of receptor and signalling pathway-related proteins and osteogenic marker genes, respectively. Results: TDSCs were successfully induced to differentiate into osteoblasts. Recombinant OSM promoted osteogenic differentiation of TDSCs to early and mid-stages. After addition of AZD1480 or stattic, decreased alkaline phosphatase and alizarin red staining were observed in the early and mid-stages of osteogenic differentiation. Additionally, decreased expression of receptor and pathway-related proteins, and osteogenic genes was found by western blotting and qPCR, respectively. Conclusion: OSM promotes osteogenic differentiation of TDSCs and the JAK2/STAT3 signalling pathway plays an important role.