The objectives of this study are to examine whether the current accounting curricula of Jordanian universities fit the Jordanian market demand, in addition to determining the skills and competences that Jordanian businesses require from accounting graduates. To achieve these objectives, an analysis of current accounting curricula of Jordanian universities took place, interviews with professionals and academics were conducted, and a questionnaire survey was administrated to a large sample of academics and professionals. The study found the presence of a significant gap between the courses covered in the accounting curricula of Jordanian universities and the skills acquired by the students versus the market’s requirements and needs. This is mainly due to the fact that the accounting curricula of Jordanian universities are structured based on specific requirements set by the Accreditation and Quality Assurance Commission for Higher Education Institutions (AQACHEI), leaving no freedom for universities to develop curriculums that meet the market’s need. It is also argued that that current exam-based assessment methodology adopted by Jordanian universities largely contributes to expanding the gap. The study recommends giving Jordanian universities more freedom in setting the curriculum for accounting programs, and that they should start revising their accounting curriculums to take into account current market needs.

Purpose: The purpose of this paper is to investigate the techniques used by Islamic financial institutions (IFIs) to shift conventional instruments to Shariah-compliant instruments. The paper additionally aims to explore the effect of these techniques on financial reporting. Design/methodology/approach: The study recognized two techniques used by the IFI: the combination of contracts which compartmentalizes the economic transaction into a series of linked sub-transactions, and the inclusion of donation (Tabarru) in commercial contracts. The paper also reviews the accounting treatment according to the Accounting and Auditing Organization for Islamic Financial Institutions (AAOIFI), and compares it to the concepts adopted by the traditional financial reporting framework concepts (especially substance over form concept). Findings: With regard to the combination of contracts technique, the major accounting challenge is whether the substance over form concept is considered. Mixed results are found: in some products, the economic substance is presented in the financial reports, while in other cases, the legal form of the contract is reported. This ambiguity may hinder the faithful representation of financial statements. The Tabarru contract is used to justify the risk-shifting practices by Islamic banks. The accounting effects of such contracts may result in failure to recognize assets or liabilities in the financial reports, earnings management and incomplete financial information for the users of the financial reports. Originality/value: This study is a response to the call raised by the consultative group established by the International Accounting Standards Board. It provides an additional insight into the accounting treatments for a combination of contracts and Tabarru contracts. It also contrasts the accounting treatments, as stipulated by the AAOIFI, with the conventional accounting frameworks.

This study examines the impact that International Public Sector Accounting Standards adoption might have on governance quality and corruption control in Spain, Portugal, and Italy. IPSAS was designed to globally enhance public transparency and accountability thanks to accrual accounting. However, its effectiveness in fighting corruption and steering better governance has varied across institutional contexts and implementation phases. This paper examines, using partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM) and comparative analysis, how legal systems, political stability, and anti-corruption measures mediate the relationship. The results indicate that full IPSAS adoption, as in the case of Spain, significantly enhances governance if the institutional framework is solid and, by extension, reduces corruption. Partial adoption, such as that by Portugal, exposes moderate improvements, but Italy, still in the preparation of the process, shows the poorest result. The study identifies that the legal system, along with complementary reforms like capacity building and political stability, is a very crucial factor in enhancing the IPSAS impact. This covers the evidential gaps and provides actionable insights for policymakers, while at the same time underlining institutional strength as a key driver for IPSAS adoption, contributing to broader discussions on advancing public sector accounting reforms.

Type of the article: Research ArticleAbstractEnvironmental reporting is expanding, yet many firms achieve limited environmental improvement when carbon effects are not translated into decision-relevant cost information for budgeting, pricing, and investment appraisal. This study examines whether integrating carbon costing into activity-based costing is associated with higher carbon and environmental disclosure quality and lower carbon intensity among listed firms in Jordan. The analysis uses disclosures for 12 firms over 2018–2024 and estimates two-way fixed-effects panel models with firm-clustered standard errors to test whether within-firm changes in costing integration are followed by changes in disclosure quality and emissions intensity after controlling for firm-specific unobserved heterogeneity and common year effects. The results show no statistically significant association between costing integration and disclosure quality (β = 0.013, p > 0.10) and no significant association with carbon intensity (β = 0.238, p > 0.10). The interaction analysis further indicates that the integration–disclosure relationship is not stronger in environmentally sensitive industries (β = −0.350, p > 0.10). By contrast, firm size is positively related to disclosure quality, suggesting that visibility, organizational capacity, and reporting resources matter more than costing integration in this context. These findings indicate weak implementation depth rather than clear environmental gains. Overall, carbon-costing integration has not yet become sufficiently embedded in routine managerial practice to produce measurable improvements in disclosure quality or emissions performance in Jordanian listed firms.

Purchasing portfolio models, particularly the Kraljic matrix, are widely used to support sourcing decisions under supply risk. Yet, they are often criticized for relying on subjective assessments and focusing mainly on upstream uncertainty while neglecting downstream demand volatility. This study develops a quantitatively grounded purchasing portfolio framework that integrates demand volatility and lead-time volatility into a unified measure of supply risk to support more sustainable sourcing decisions. Using transactional data for 876 stock-keeping units (SKUs) from a pharmaceutical distribution company, demand and lead-time volatility are measured through coefficients of variation and combined using an adjusted multifactor model that accounts for their interdependence. Financial importance is measured objectively through gross profit and classified according to the 80–20 Pareto principle. These metrics are incorporated into a revised purchasing portfolio matrix that classifies items into strategic, leverage, bottleneck, and routine categories. The findings reveal substantial variation in combined volatility across SKUs and show that incorporating demand uncertainty significantly changes portfolio positioning compared with traditional approaches. By linking purchasing and marketing perspectives, the proposed model reduces subjectivity, improves risk visibility, and supports sustainable sourcing and inventory decisions in volatile environments.