It has been theorized that hemispheric dominance and more segregated information processing have evolved to overcome long conduction delays through the corpus callosum (transcallosal conduction delay - TCD) but that this may still impact behavioral performance, mostly in tasks requiring high timing accuracy. Nevertheless, a thorough understanding of the temporal features of interhemispheric communication is lacking. Here, we aimed to assess the relationship between TCD and behavioral performance with a noninvasive directional cortical measure of TCD obtained from transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS)-evoked potentials (TEPs) in the motor system. Twenty-one healthy right-handed subjects were tested. TEPs were recorded during an ipsilateral silent period (iSP) paradigm and integrated with diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) and an in-phase bimanual thumb-opposition task. Linear mixed models were applied to test relationships between measures. We found TEP indexes of transcallosal communication at ∼15 ms both after primary motor cortex stimulation (M1-P15) and after dorsal premotor cortex stimulation (dPMC-P15). Both M1-and dPMC-P15 were predicted by mean diffusivity in the callosal body. Moreover, M1-P15 was positively related to iSP. Importantly, M1-P15 latency was linked to bimanual coordination with direction-dependent effects, so that asymmetric TCD was the best predictor of bimanual coordination. Our findings support the idea that transcallosal timing in signal transmission is essential for interhemispheric communication and can impact the final behavioral outcome. However, they challenge the view that a short conduction delay is always beneficial. Rather, they suggest that the effect of the conduction delay may depend on the direction of information flow.

Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS)‐evoked potentials (TEPs) are a promising proxy for measuring effective connectivity, that is, the directed transmission of physiological signals along cortico‐cortical tracts, and for developing connectivity‐based biomarkers. A crucial point is how stimulation parameters may affect TEPs, as they may contribute to the general variability of findings across studies. Here, we manipulated two TMS parameters (i.e. current direction and pulse waveform) while measuring (a) an early TEP component reflecting contralateral inhibition of motor areas, namely, M1‐P15, as an operative model of interhemispheric cortico‐cortical connectivity, and (b) motor‐evoked potentials (MEP) for the corticospinal pathway. Our results showed that these two TMS parameters are crucial to evoke the M1‐P15, influencing its amplitude, latency, and replicability. Specifically, (a) M1‐P15 amplitude was strongly affected by current direction in monophasic stimulation; (b) M1‐P15 latency was significantly modulated by current direction for monophasic and biphasic pulses. The replicability of M1‐P15 was substantial for the same stimulation condition. At the same time, it was poor when stimulation parameters were changed, suggesting that these factors must be controlled to obtain stable single‐subject measures. Finally, MEP latency was modulated by current direction, whereas non‐statistically significant changes were evident for amplitude. Overall, our study highlights the importance of TMS parameters for early TEP responses recording and suggests controlling their impact in developing connectivity biomarkers from TEPs. Moreover, these results point out that the excitability of the corticospinal tract, which is commonly used as a reference to set TMS intensity, may not correspond to the excitability of cortico‐cortical pathways.

Communication-through-coherence proposes that the phase synchronization (PS) of neural oscillations between cortical areas supports neural communication. In this study, we exploited transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS)-evoked potentials (TEPs) to test this hypothesis at the macroscale level, i.e., whether PS between cortical areas supports interarea communication. TEPs are electroencephalographic (EEG) responses time-locked to TMS pulses reflecting interarea communication, as they are generated by the transmission of neural activity from the stimulated area to connected regions. If interarea PS is important for communication, it should be associated with the TEP amplitude in the connected areas. TMS was delivered over the left primary motor cortex (M1) of fourteen healthy volunteers, and 70-channel EEG was recorded. Early TEP components were source-localized to identify their generators, i.e., distant brain regions activated by M1 through effective connections. Next, linear regressions were used to test the relationship between the TEP amplitude and the pre-stimulus PS between the M1 and the connected regions in four frequency bands (range 4-45 Hz). Pre-stimulus interarea PS in the alpha-band was positively associated with the amplitude of early TEP components, namely, the N15 (ipsilateral supplementary motor area), P25 (contralateral M1) and P60 (ipsilateral parietal cortex). Alpha-band PS predicts the response amplitude of the distant brain regions effectively connected to M1. Our study supports the role of EEG-PS in interarea communication, as theorized by communication-through-coherence.

In a recently published study combining transcranial magnetic stimulation and electroencephalography (TMS-EEG), an early component of TMS-evoked potentials (TEPs), i.e., M1-P15, was proposed as a measure of transcallosal inhibition between motor cortices. Given that early TEPs are known to be highly variable, further evidence is needed before M1-P15 can be considered a reliable index of effective connectivity. Here, we conceived a new preregistered TMS-EEG study with two aims. The first aim was validating the M1-P15 as a cortical index of transcallosal inhibition by replicating previous findings on its relationship with the ipsilateral silent period (iSP) and with performance in bimanual coordination. The second aim was inducing a task-dependent modulation of transcallosal inhibition. A new sample of 32 healthy right-handed participants underwent behavioral motor tasks and TMS-EEG recording, in which left and right M1 were stimulated both during bimanual tasks and during an iSP paradigm. Hypotheses and methods were preregistered before data collection. Results show a replication of our previous findings on the positive relationship between M1-P15 amplitude and the iSP normalized area. Differently, the relationship between M1-P15 latency and bimanual coordination was not confirmed. Finally, M1-P15 amplitude was modulated by the characteristics of the bimanual task the participants were performing, and not by the contralateral hand activity during the iSP paradigm. In sum, the present results corroborate our previous findings in validating the M1-P15 as a cortical marker of transcallosal inhibition and provide novel evidence of its task-dependent modulation. Importantly, we demonstrate the feasibility of preregistration in the TMS-EEG field to increase methodological rigor and transparency.