Purpose: Bladder cancer is a current clinical and social problem. At diagnosis, most patients present with nonmuscle-invasive tumors, characterized by a high recurrence rate, which could progress to muscle-invasive disease and metastasis. Bone morphogenetic protein (BMP)–dependent signaling arising from stromal bladder tissue mediates urothelial homeostasis by promoting urothelial cell differentiation. However, the possible role of BMP ligands in bladder cancer is still unclear. Experimental Design: Tumor and normal tissue from 68 patients with urothelial cancer were prospectively collected and analyzed for expression of BMP and macrophage markers. The mechanism of action was assessed in vitro by experiments with bladder cancer cell lines and peripheral blood monocyte–derived macrophages. Results: We observed BMP4 expression is associated and favored type II macrophage differentiation. In vitro experiments showed that both recombinant BMP4 and BMP4-containing conditioned media from bladder cancer cell lines favored monocyte/macrophage polarization toward M2 phenotype macrophages, as shown by the expression and secretion of IL10. Using a series of human bladder cancer patient samples, we also observed increased expression of BMP4 in advanced and undifferentiated tumors in close correlation with epithelial–mesenchymal transition (EMT). However, the p-Smad 1,5,8 staining in tumors showing EMT signs was reduced, due to the increased miR-21 expression leading to reduced BMPR2 expression. Conclusions: These findings suggest that BMP4 secretion by bladder cancer cells provides the M2 signal necessary for a protumoral immune environment. In addition, the repression of BMPR2 by miR-21 makes the tumor cells refractory to the prodifferentiating actions mediated by BMP ligands, favoring tumor growth. Clin Cancer Res; 23(23); 7388–99. ©2017 AACR.

Bacillus Calmette–Guérin (BCG) induction and maintenance (I+M) after transurethral resection of bladder tumor is standard of care (SOC) in high-risk non-muscle invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC). However, disease recurrence/progression occurs in approximately 40% of patients at 2 years, with unfavorable prognosis. Limited bladder-sparing therapeutic options exist, and no improvements to response durability have been observed in decades. CREST is a global, phase 3, randomized trial evaluating subcutaneous sasanlimab in combination with BCG-I+M (Arm A), sasanlimab in combination with BCG-I (Arm B) or BCG-I+M (Arm C) in BCG-naive high-risk NMIBC. The primary endpoint was investigator-assessed event-free survival (EFS) for Arm A versus Arm C; key secondary endpoints were EFS (Arm B versus Arm C) and overall survival. Patients were randomized 1:1:1 to Arm A (N = 352), Arm B (N = 352) and Arm C (N = 351). The trial met its primary endpoint with a statistically significant and clinically meaningful prolongation of EFS (Arm A versus Arm C); hazard ratio, 0.68 (95% confidence interval: 0.49–0.94); one-sided P = 0.0095. The 36-month estimated EFS rates were 82.1% (Arm A) and 74.8% (Arm C). EFS benefit for Arm A versus Arm C was observed across prespecified subgroups, including carcinoma in situ (CIS) and T1. The safety profile of the combination was consistent with the known profiles. To our knowledge, sasanlimab is the first anti-PD-1 antibody to show a clinically meaningful prolongation of EFS when combined with BCG-I+M versus SOC in patients with BCG-naive high-risk NMIBC. Sasanlimab combined with BCG-I+M has the potential to redefine the treatment paradigm and clinical decision-making for patients with BCG-naive high-risk NMIBC. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT04165317.

Purpose: Bladder cancer (BC) is a clinical and social problem due to its high incidence and recurrence rates. It frequently appears in elderly patients showing other medical comorbidities that hamper the use of standard chemotherapy. We evaluated the activity of CDK4/6 inhibitor as a new therapy for patients unfit for cisplatin (CDDP). Experimental Design: BC cell lines were tested for in vitro sensitivity to CDK4/6 inhibition. A novel metastatic BC mouse model was developed and used to test its in vivo activity. Results: Cell lines tested were sensitive to CDK4/6 inhibition, independent on RB1 gene status. Transcriptome analyses and knockdown experiments revealed a major role for FOXM1 in this response. CDK4/6 inhibition resulted in reduced FOXM1 phosphorylation in vitro and in vivo and showed synergy with CDDP, allowing a significant tumor regression. FOXM1 exert important oncogenic roles in BC. Conclusions: CDK4/6 inhibitors, alone or in combination, are a novel therapeutic strategy for advanced BC patients previously classified as unfit for current treatment options.

PURPOSE: TAR-200 is a first-in-class intravesical drug-releasing system designed to provide sustained delivery of gemcitabine in the bladder. TAR-200 alone or in combination with cetrelimab (PD-1 inhibitor) could improve outcomes in patients with bacillus Calmette-Guérin (BCG)–unresponsive high-risk non–muscle-invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC) ineligible for or refusing radical cystectomy. METHODS: In this phase IIb parallel cohort study, patients with BCG-unresponsive carcinoma in situ (CIS) with/without papillary disease received TAR-200 monotherapy (Cohort 2 [C2]), TAR-200 plus cetrelimab (C1), or cetrelimab monotherapy (C3). Patients with BCG-unresponsive high-risk papillary disease–only NMIBC received TAR-200 monotherapy (C4). TAR-200 was dosed through month 24 and cetrelimab through month 18. Primary end points were centrally confirmed overall complete response (CR) rate (C1-3) or disease-free survival (DFS) rate (C4) (ClinicalTrials.gov number: NCT04640623 ). RESULTS: At data cutoff (March 31, 2025), 53, 85, 28, and 52 patients were treated in C1-4, respectively. In C2, CR rate and median duration of response were 82.4% (95% CI, 72.6 to 89.8) and 25.8 months (95% CI, 8.3 to not estimable), respectively. In C4, 6-, 9-, and 12-month DFS rates were 85.3% (95% CI, 71.6 to 92.7), 81.1% (95% CI, 66.7 to 89.7), and 70.2% (95% CI, 51.6 to 82.8), respectively. In C1 and C3, CR rates were 67.9% (95% CI, 53.7 to 80.1) and 46.4% (95% CI, 27.5 to 66.1), respectively. Rates of grade ≥3 treatment-related adverse events (AEs) were 12.9%, 13.5%, 37.7%, and 7.1% in C2, C4, C1, and C3, respectively, and of serious treatment-related AEs, 5.9%, 5.8%, 15.1%, and 3.6%. No treatment-related deaths occurred. CONCLUSION: TAR-200 monotherapy was well tolerated, with a high CR rate, durable responses, and prolonged DFS in patients with BCG-unresponsive high-risk NMIBC. TAR-200 monotherapy offered a more favorable risk-benefit profile versus TAR-200 plus cetrelimab or cetrelimab alone in BCG-unresponsive CIS.

Purpose: The purpose of the study was to compare the outcomes of high-risk non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer (HR-NMIBC) patients treated with BCG vs recirculating hyperthermic intravesical chemotherapy (HIVEC) with mitomycin C (MMC). Methods: A pilot phase II randomized clinical trial was conducted including HR-NMIBC patients, excluding carcinoma in situ. Patients were randomized 1:1 to receive intravesical BCG for 1 year (once weekly for 6 weeks plus subsequent maintenance) or HIVEC with 40 mg MMC, administered using the Combat BRS system (once weekly instillations were given for 6 weeks, followed by once monthly instillation for 6 months). Total recirculating dwell time for HIVEC was 60 min at a target temperature of 43° ± 0.5 °C. Primary endpoint was recurrence-free survival. Secondary endpoints were time to recurrence, progression-free survival, cancer-specific survival, and overall survival at 24 months. Adverse events were routinely assessed. Results: Fifty patients were enrolled. Mean age was 73.5 years. Median follow-up was 33.7 months. Recurrence-free survival at 24 months was 86.5% for HIVEC and 71.8% for BCG (p = 0.184) in the intention-to-treat analysis and 95.0% for HIVEC and 75.1% for BCG (p = 0.064) in the per protocol analysis. Time to recurrence was 21.5 and 16.1 months for HIVEC and BCG, respectively. Progression-free survival for HIVEC vs BCG was 95.7% vs 71.8% (p = 0.043) in the intention-to-treat analysis and 100% vs 75.1% (p = 0.018) in the per protocol analysis, respectively. Cancer-specific survival at 24 months was 100% for both groups and overall survival was 91.5% for HIVEC vs 81.8% for BCG. Conclusion: HIVEC provides comparable safety and efficacy to BCG and is a reasonable alternative during BCG shortages. Trial registration: EudraCT 2016-001186-85. Date of registration: 17 March 2016.

Uncontrolled donation after circulatory death (uDCD) increases organ availability for kidney transplantation (KT) with short‐term outcomes similar to those obtained from donation after brain death (DBD) donors. However, heterogeneous results in the long term have been reported. We compared 10‐year outcomes between 237 KT recipients from uDCD donors maintained by normothermic extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (nECMO) and 237 patients undergoing KT from standard criteria DBD donors during the same period at our institution. We further analyzed risk factors for death‐censored graft survival in the uDCD group. Delayed graft function (DGF) was more common in the uDCD group (73.4% versus 46.4%; P‐value 50 years was associated with graft loss in the uDCD group (hazard ratio: 1.91; P‐value = 0.058), whereas the occurrence of DGF showed no significant effect. uDCD KT under nECMO support resulted in similar graft function and long‐term outcomes compared with KT from standard criteria DBD donors. Increased donor age could negatively impact graft survival after uDCD donation.