The study explores the influence of contextual factors surrounding production planning and green strategic investment decision‐making practices (GSIDMP) in UK companies. We utilize a mixed‐method approach as a research methodology to study the current trend of production planning and GSIDMP. This study's conceptual model is rooted conspicuously in the resource‐based theory (RBT), natural‐resource‐based view, and dynamic capabilities. We empirically examine the nexus among GSIDMP, technological innovation, dynamic capability, and companies' performance. Our study was based on a sample selected from UK‐listed companies, FTSE ALL‐Share Index for the period (2012–2021). Also, the study utilizes data from the UK Innovation Survey (2018–2020) and corporate disclosure through companies' annual reports as a complementary approach for data collection. Findings of this study explore the interdependencies among company dynamic capability, advanced technological innovation and governance mechanisms, and their mediation influence on the nexus between GSIDMP and companies' performance. This study sheds lights on current business innovation strategies. Findings reveal how current practices of production planning and GSIDM in large UK companies shaped by boardrooms absorptive and adaptive capabilities, knowledge‐generating and knowledge‐collaboration capabilities, technological adoption, and corporate governance mechanisms. This study offers insight regarding boardrooms proactive engagement in exploration and exploitation activities to strengthen ambidexterity through various innovation trajectories associated with green production and GSIDMP towards sustainability. We provide managerial implications for decision‐makers, regulators, investors, scholars, and other stakeholders.

The world is constantly changing, and with an evolving global environmental crisis, there is a growing trend of Corporate Social Responsibility, and Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) disclosure initiatives. The final report on the new E.U. taxonomy for sustainable activities was released in 2020, making ESG disclosure more relevant. This paper investigates the effects of ESG initiatives on the financial performance of Norwegian listed companies from 2010 to 2019. ESG is measured through the Thomson Reuters Eikon ESG disclosure score and financial performance through ROA and Tobin’s Q. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first time this relationship has been investigated in Norway. Using panel data regression analysis and two proxies for the dependent variable (financial performance), the results of this study are mixed. In particular, findings suggest a strong significant relationship between ESG initiatives and financial performance. More specifically, the regression model, with ROA as the dependent variable, suggests that ESG initiatives have a clear negative impact. On the other hand, the variable Tobin’s Q increases when ESG increases. This could be explained by the different horizons of the measures and other factors affecting the business environment.

Purpose: This paper aims to investigate whether Covid-19 related information is associated with a higher level of performance disclosure in the annual reports. Furthermore, it examines the moderating effect of corporate governance on the relationship between Covid-19 and the performance disclosure by using three governance mechanisms: board size, board independence and gender diversity.Design/methodology/approach: The authors use quantitative content analysis. The authors applied an automated textual analysis technique to measure the level of Covid-19 information and performance disclosure for the UK Financial Times Stock Exchange all-share non-financial firms.Findings: The authors found a significant positive relationship between the Covid-19 disclosure and the firm performance disclosure in the annual reports. The authors also find that both board independence and gender diversity moderate the relationship between the Covid-19 related information and the level of performance disclosure in the annual reports. The authors further run a robustness analysis, which confirms the main results.Practical implications: The finding is beneficial for the regulatory setters to better understand whether firms provide generic or meaningful Covid-19 information linked to the firm’s performance. The unique findings of this paper are relevant to regulators, governments, management, shareholders and academics.Originality/value: The authors contribute to the literature in a unique and core research area not researched previously. The paper links the Covid-19 disclosure with the firm performance from the corporate narrative perspective. The paper underlines governance factors as a moderating role in this relationship by considering three main mechanisms: board size, board independence and gender diversity.

This research examines how ESG disclosure influences market uncertainty through carbon disclosure. It uses a 10-year dataset from 2012 to 2021 of non-financial U.K. companies in the FTSE All-Share index. This study employs four regression methods to scrutinize the interplay between ESG disclosure, carbon disclosure, and market uncertainty. The research findings uncover a notable reduction in market uncertainty associated with ESG disclosure, aligning with the Information Asymmetry Theory. Interestingly, this study also uncovers that carbon disclosure amplifies this negative relationship, a finding that resonates with the Signaling Theory. These results hold true across various measures of ESG and market uncertainty. This study enriches the sustainability reporting literature with implications for theory and practice. It extends Information Asymmetry and Signaling Theories to U.K. non-financial firms, emphasizing the need for more research on sustainability disclosure. It underscores the role of ESG and carbon disclosure in reducing cost of capital, enhancing firm value, and boosting investor confidence. It calls for transparent ESG reporting by managers, regulatory promotion of such disclosures, and stakeholder utilization of these to evaluate a firm’s impact and contribution to the SDGs, fostering collaboration on sustainability. This study offers key insights for stakeholders such as managers, investors, regulators, researchers, policy makers, and educators in the realm of sustainability reporting and market dynamics.

This research examines the effect of ESG disclosure on the cost of capital for non-financial firms in the UK, indexed by the FTSE All-Share Index, during the period from 2014 to 2018. Using multivariate analysis with ordinary least squares (OLS), fixed effects, robust regression, and Tobit models, this research assesses the effect of ESG reporting, governance, and the cost of capital, including robustness checks using an alternative ESG indicator, the environmental pillar score. Contrary to expectations, ESG reporting is positively associated with the cost of capital. However, corporate governance moderates this relationship, weakening the positive correlation and reversing it to a negative association for firms with strong governance practices, consistent with the hypotheses. This research also finds that firm size, liquidity, profitability, and leverage, positively affect the cost of capital, while board size, independent board composition, audit committee independence, and auditor type do not significantly influence it. Notably, non-executive directors on the audit committee have a significant negative effect on the cost of capital. These findings are valuable for investors, companies, regulators, auditors, policymakers, and the academic and research community. Specifically, for investors, this study provides insights into how ESG disclosures can influence investment risks and returns, highlighting the importance of robust corporate governance. Companies can leverage these insights to enhance their governance practices and optimize their capital costs. Regulators and policymakers can use the findings to develop guidelines that encourage transparent ESG reporting and strong governance frameworks, thereby improving market stability and investor confidence. Auditors can utilize the results to better understand the effect of non-financial reporting on financial metrics, helping to provide more accurate audits and assessments. These findings inform investors, companies, regulators, auditors, and academia, in fostering a more sustainable and transparent financial environment.