Mandatory working from home is one of the consequences of the COVID-19 pandemic for a large number of workers. Transition to working from home may significantly impact lifestyle, psychosocial status, and the overall health of workers. This review summarizes available data about the effects of lockdown measures, particularly working from home, on cardiovascular risk factors including sedentary lifestyle, unhealthy diet pattern, psychological distress, smoking, alcohol misuse, and cardiometabolic parameters. Finally, we suggest countermeasures that can attenuate the negative health impact of working from home. Indeed, timely and tailored interventions implemented by companies in cooperation with the health care system could allow workers to benefit more from some of the advantages associated with working from home.

Growing evidence shows that COVID-19 is associated with an increase in Tako-Tsubo syndrome (TTS) incidence. We collected data from patients hospitalized in our multidisciplinary COVID 19 department who had a diagnosis of TTS during the second and third waves of the pandemic in Italy. We reported four cases of TTS associated with COVID-19. Except for COVID-19, no patient had any classical TTS triggers. The mean age was 72 years (67-81) and all patients had COVID-19-related interstitial pneumonia confirmed by computed tomography. Typical apical ballooning and transitory reduction in left ventricle (LV) systolic function with a complete recovery before discharge were observed in all patients. The mean LV ejection fraction at TTS onset was 42% (40-48%). The electrocardiogram showed ST-segment elevation in two cases, while an evolution with negative T waves and corrected QT prolongation was observed in all patients. Three patients underwent coronary angiography. Two patients had Alzheimer's disease. The time interval from hospital admission to TTS onset was 4 (2-6) days, and the time interval from COVID19 symptom onset to TTS diagnosis was 10 (8-12) days. COVID19 may be a trigger for TTS, though TTS pathophysiology in COVID-19 patients remains unclear, likely due to its multifactorial nature.

The clinical benefit of beta-blocker treatment in patients with a previous myocardial infarction (MI) and without a reduced left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) is not established. This study aims at assessing the impact of beta-blocker treatment after an MI based on the type of MI at presentation, the LVEF, and the patient’s sex in the setting of contemporary management of MI. We searched the PubMed and Cochrane Library databases for randomized clinical trials published over last ten years that reported beta-blockers’ impact on prognosis in patients with LVEF > 40%. A meta-analysis was performed to assess the association between the beta-blocker treatment and outcomes in different patient subgroups based on the type at presentation (with ST segment elevation, STEMI, or without ST segment elevation, NSTEMI), LVEF, and sex. In the overall analysis, the association between beta-blocker non-use and the composite endpoint was not statistically significant under the random-effects model. In subgroup analyses, a higher risk with beta-blocker non-use was suggested in NSTEMI and in patients with mildly reduced LVEF in common-effect estimates (NSTEMI: RR 1.13, 95% CI 1.02–1.25; I² 18%; mildly reduced LVEF: RR 1.24, 95% CI 1.03–1.49; I² 0%), whereas corresponding random-effects estimates were not consistently significant. No clear association was observed in STEMI, preserved LVEF, or by sex. In sensitivity analyses excluding the ABYSS withdrawal trial, the overall association was attenuated and remained non-significant (random-effects RR 1.06, 95% CI 0.84–1.33; I² 35%). Long-term beta-blocker therapy after myocardial infarction showed no clear overall benefit or harm across contemporary randomized trials. Possible signals of benefit in selected subgroups warrant confirmation in adequately powered studies with standardized endpoints.