Adem Öcal

Dr. Adem Öcal

Independent Researcher, Ankara, Turkey (Türkiye)
orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

17Years (2010-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
Vladimir M. M. CvetkovićVladimir M. M. Cvetković
Vladimir M. M. Cvetković
GRGiulia Roder
Giulia Roder
Adem ÖcalAdem Öcal
Adem Öcal
Paolo TarolliPaolo Tarolli
Paolo Tarolli
SDSlavoljub S. Dragicevic
Slavoljub S. Dragicevic
Adverse outcomes from 2014 flooding in Serbia indicated problematic response phase management accentuated by a gender imbalance. For this reason, we investigated the risk perceptions and preparedness of women and men regarding these types of events in Serbia. Face-to-face interviews, administered to 2500 participants, were conducted across 19 of 191 municipalities. In light of the current findings, men seemed to be more confident in their abilities to cope with flooding, perceiving greater individual and household preparedness. By contrast, women displayed a deeper understanding of these events. Perhaps owing to a deeper level of understanding, women demonstrated more household-caring attitudes and behaviors and were more prone to report a willingness to help flood victims at reception centers. Emergency management agencies and land planners should account for these differences in gender awareness and preparedness. Based on these findings, doing so may increase citizen participation and shared responsibility under flood hazard scenarios.

Vladimir M. M. CvetkovićVladimir M. M. Cvetković
Vladimir M. M. Cvetković
NNNeda Nikolić
Neda Nikolić
UNUna Radovanović Nenadić
Una Radovanović Nenadić
Adem ÖcalAdem Öcal
Adem Öcal
ENEric K. Noji
Eric K. Noji
MZMiodrag Zečević
Miodrag Zečević
Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is an infectious disease caused by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2. The disease was first detected in Wuhan, the capital of China’s Hubei province, in December 2019 and has since spread globally, especially to Europe and North America, resulting in the ongoing global coronavirus pandemic disaster of 2019–2020. Although most cases have mild symptoms, there is some progression to viral pneumonia and multi-organ failure and death. More than 4.6 million cases have been registered across 216 countries and territories as of 19 April 2020, resulting in more than 311,000 deaths. Risk to communities with continued widespread disease transmission depends on characteristics of the virus, including how well it spreads between people; the severity of resulting illness; and the medical or other measures available to control the impact of the virus (for example, vaccines or medications that can treat the illness) and the relative success of these. In the absence of vaccines or medications, non-pharmaceutical interventions were the most important response strategy based on community interventions such as person-to-person distancing, mask-wearing, isolation and good personal hygiene (hand-washing)—all of which have been demonstrated can reduce the impact of this seemingly unstoppable globally spreading natural disaster. This paper presents the results of quantitative research regarding the level of citizen preparedness for disasters caused by coronavirus disease (COVID-19) in Serbia. The survey was conducted using a questionnaire that was requested and then collected online among 975 respondents during disaster in April 2020. The questionnaire examined citizens’ basic socio-economic and demographic characteristics, their knowledge, preparedness, risk perception and preventive measures taken individually and as a community to prevent the death and widespread transmission of novel coronavirus disease 2019 in the Republic of Serbia. Based on the findings that there are major differences in the public’s perception of risks posed by communicable disease threats such as presented by COVID-19, emergency management agencies should use these differences to develop targeted strategies to enhance community and national preparedness by promoting behavioral change and improving risk management decision-making.

Vladimir M. M. CvetkovićVladimir M. M. Cvetković
Vladimir M. M. Cvetković
JTJasmina Tanasic
Jasmina Tanasic
Adem ÖcalAdem Öcal
Adem Öcal
ŽKŽelimir Kešetović
Želimir Kešetović
NNNeda Nikolić
Neda Nikolić
ADAleksandar Dragašević
Aleksandar Dragašević
The objective of this research was to examine the capacity development of local self-governments in the field of disaster risk management (DRM). This quantitative research examines the degree of implementation of strategic, legislative, and institutional frameworks, as well as the capacity of local authorities to apply related policies through five analytical scopes: (1) degree of preparedness and legal framework; (2) financial framework; (3) policy aspects; (4) cooperation and partnership; (5) communication. The ability of municipalities and towns to respond to disasters was also analyzed and compared. In this paper, our initial hypothesis was that the effective implementation of the concept of DRM policy in towns of Serbia requires the continual strategic, tactical, and operational transformation of the public administration and public management system in order to strengthen the capacity of local self-governments for disaster prevention, preparation, response, and recovery. This multimethod research was conducted over the period of 2014–2017 and included the following two target groups: (a) heads of disaster sectors in local self-government units (mayor) and (b) employees of the DRM sector in local self-government units. The results of this research will enable decision makers to successfully respond to challenges and help to improve the capacity of local self-governments and public local administrations within the scope of DRM in the Republic of Serbia, based on the principles of prevention and proactive action, coordination, cooperation, partnership, and responsibility.

1 April 2019 in International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
Vladimir M. M. CvetkovićVladimir M. M. Cvetković
Vladimir M. M. Cvetković
Adem ÖcalAdem Öcal
Adem Öcal
AIAleksandar Ivanov
Aleksandar Ivanov

1 September 2016 in International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
HBHoda Baytiyeh
Hoda Baytiyeh
Adem ÖcalAdem Öcal
Adem Öcal

1 January 2020 in Geomatics, Natural Hazards and Risk
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
Adem ÖcalAdem Öcal
Adem Öcal
Vladimir M. M. CvetkovićVladimir M. M. Cvetković
Vladimir M. M. Cvetković
HBHoda Baytiyeh
Hoda Baytiyeh
FTFantina Maria Santos Tedim
Fantina Maria Santos Tedim
MZMiodrag Zečević
Miodrag Zečević
A new coronavirus emerged in December 2019 and quickly spread globally, causing unprecedented social, psychological, and economic damage. This study aimed to investigate people’s emotional reactions to the COVID-19 pandemic. The dataset for this study consisted of 2,013 adults (962 males and 1,053 females) in four countries (Italy, Lebanon, Portugal, and Serbia). A snowball sampling technique that focused on recruiting the general public living in countries during the COVID-19 epidemic was utilized. An online survey was disseminated at the same time, in March–April 2020, when many countries were exposed to COVID-19. Results indicated that, with regard to gender, females had more psychological reactions to COVID-19 than did males. People who had one child were more stressed than people with no children. Extensive knowledge of COVID-19 was found to trigger more anxiety. Results showed that stress and overall emotional reactions increased with age. The findings can be used to develop psychological interventions to improve mental health and psychological resilience during the COVID-19 epidemic.