Roman Rybka

Dr. Roman Rybka


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

12Years (2015-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 January 2016 in Procedia Computer Science
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
Alexander SboevAlexander Sboev
Alexander Sboev
TLTatiana A. Litvinova
Tatiana A. Litvinova
DGDmitry Gudovskikh
Dmitry Gudovskikh
RRRoman Rybka
Roman Rybka
IMIvan Moloshnikov
Ivan Moloshnikov

31 July 2023 in Neural Networks
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
DVDanila Vlasov
Danila Vlasov
AMAnton Minnekhanov
Anton Minnekhanov
RRRoman Rybka
Roman Rybka
YDYury Davydov
Yury Davydov
ASAlexander Sboev
Alexander Sboev
VDVyacheslav Demin
Vyacheslav Demin

1 February 2018 in Applied Mathematics Letters
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
Nikolay KudryashovNikolay Kudryashov
Nikolay Kudryashov
RRRoman Rybka
Roman Rybka
Alexander SboevAlexander Sboev
Alexander Sboev

14 December 2021 in Mathematics
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Alexander SboevAlexander Sboev
Alexander Sboev
DVDanila Vlasov
Danila Vlasov
RRRoman Rybka
Roman Rybka
YDYury Davydov
Yury Davydov
ASAlexey Serenko
Alexey Serenko
VDVyacheslav Demin
Vyacheslav Demin
The problem with training spiking neural networks (SNNs) is relevant due to the ultra-low power consumption these networks could exhibit when implemented in neuromorphic hardware. The ongoing progress in the fabrication of memristors, a prospective basis for analogue synapses, gives relevance to studying the possibility of SNN learning on the base of synaptic plasticity models, obtained by fitting the experimental measurements of the memristor conductance change. The dynamics of memristor conductances is (necessarily) nonlinear, because conductance changes depend on the spike timings, which neurons emit in an all-or-none fashion. The ability to solve classification tasks was previously shown for spiking network models based on the bio-inspired local learning mechanism of spike-timing-dependent plasticity (STDP), as well as with the plasticity that models the conductance change of nanocomposite (NC) memristors. Input data were presented to the network encoded into the intensities of Poisson input spike sequences. This work considers another approach for encoding input data into input spike sequences presented to the network: temporal encoding, in which an input vector is transformed into relative timing of individual input spikes. Since temporal encoding uses fewer input spikes, the processing of each input vector by the network can be faster and more energy-efficient. The aim of the current work is to show the applicability of temporal encoding to training spiking networks with three synaptic plasticity models: STDP, NC memristor approximation, and PPX memristor approximation. We assess the accuracy of the proposed approach on several benchmark classification tasks: Fisher’s Iris, Wisconsin breast cancer, and the pole balancing task (CartPole). The accuracies achieved by SNN with memristor plasticity and conventional STDP are comparable and are on par with classic machine learning approaches.

1 January 2018 in Procedia Computer Science
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
Alexander SboevAlexander Sboev
Alexander Sboev
DVDanila Vlasov
Danila Vlasov
RRRoman Rybka
Roman Rybka
ASAlexey Serenko
Alexey Serenko
A method to solve the classification task using a spiking neural network with encoding the input by patterns of spike times along with Spike-Timing-Dependent Plasticity learning is proposed. Input data is encoded using Gaussian receptive fields. The method is tested on Fisher’s Iris dataset. As the result, after learning a neuron responds with less latency to patterns encoding samples of the class on which it was trained, in comparison to the classes it was not trained on.