Timothy J. Pierson

Prof. Dr. Timothy J. Pierson


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

5Years (2022-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
21 November 2024 in Proceedings of the ACM on Interactive, Mobile, Wearable and Ubiquitous Technologies
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
CWChixiang Wang
Chixiang Wang
WHWeijia He
Weijia He
TPTimothy J. Pierson
Timothy J. Pierson
DKDavid F. Kotz
David F. Kotz
Smart-home technology is now pervasive, demanding increased attention to the security of the devices and the privacy of the home's residents. To assist residents in making security and privacy decisions - e.g., whether to allow a new device to connect to the network, or whether to be alarmed when an unknown device is discovered - it helps to know whether the device is inside the home, or outside. In this paper we present MOAT, a system that leverages Wi-Fi sniffers to analyze the physical properties of a device's wireless transmissions to infer whether that device is located inside or outside of a home. MOAT can adaptively self-update to accommodate changes in the home indoor environment to ensure robust long-term performance. Notably, MOAT does not require prior knowledge of the home's layout or cooperation from target devices, and is easy to install and configure. We evaluated MOAT in four different homes with 21 diverse commercial smart devices and achieved an overall balanced accuracy rate of up to 95.6%. Our novel periodic adaptation technique allowed our approach to maintain high accuracy even after rearranging furniture in the home. MOAT is a practical and efficient first step for monitoring and managing devices in a smart home.

11 January 2022 in Remote Sensing
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
BPBeatrice Perez
Beatrice Perez
GMGregory Mazzaro
Gregory Mazzaro
TPTimothy J. Pierson
Timothy J. Pierson
DKDavid F. Kotz
David F. Kotz
Data about users is collected constantly by phones, cameras, Internet websites, and others. The advent of so-called ‘Smart Things’ now enable ever-more sensitive data to be collected inside that most private of spaces: the home. The first step in helping users regain control of their information (inside their home) is to alert them to the presence of potentially unwanted electronics. In this paper, we present a system that could help homeowners (or home dwellers) find electronic devices in their living space. Specifically, we demonstrate the use of harmonic radars (sometimes called nonlinear junction detectors), which have also been used in applications ranging from explosives detection to insect tracking. We adapt this radar technology to detect consumer electronics in a home setting and show that we can indeed accurately detect the presence of even ‘simple’ electronic devices like a smart lightbulb. We evaluate the performance of our radar in both wired and over-the-air transmission scenarios.

28 February 2024
Verified
Conference Paper
Open access
CWChixiang Wang
Chixiang Wang
LCLiam Cassidy
Liam Cassidy
WHWeijia He
Weijia He
TPTimothy J. Pierson
Timothy J. Pierson
DKDavid F. Kotz
David F. Kotz
Smart-home devices have become integral to daily routines, but their onboarding procedures - setting up a newly acquired smart device into operational mode - remain understudied. The heterogeneity of smart-home devices and their onboarding procedure can easily overwhelm users when they scale up their smart-home system. While Matter, the new IoT standard, aims to unify the smart-home ecosystem, it is still evolving, resulting in mixed compliance among devices. In this paper, we study the complexity of device onboarding from users' perspectives. We thus performed cognitive walkthroughs on 12 commercially available smart-home devices, documenting the commonality and distinctions of the onboarding process across these devices. We found that onboarding smart home devices can often be tedious and confusing. Users must devote significant time to creating an account, searching for the target device, and providing Wi-Fi credentials for each device they install. Matter-compatible devices are supposedly easier to manage, as they can be registered through one single hub independent of the vendor. Unfortunately, we found such a statement is not always true. Some devices still need their own companion apps and accounts to fully function. Based on our observations, we give recommendations about how to support a more user-friendly onboarding process.

1 April 2024 in Proceedings on Privacy Enhancing Technologies
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
WHWeijia He
Weijia He
NRNathan Reitinger
Nathan Reitinger
AAAtheer Almogbil
Atheer Almogbil
YCYi-Shyuan Chiang
Yi-Shyuan Chiang
TPTimothy J. Pierson
Timothy J. Pierson
DKDavid F. Kotz
David F. Kotz
A key feature of smart home devices is monitoring the environment and recording data. These devices provide security via motion-detection video alerts, cost-savings via thermostat usage history, and peace of mind via functions like auto-locking doors or water leak detectors. At the same time, the sharing of this information in interpersonal relationships---though necessary---is currently accomplished on an all-or-nothing basis. This can easily lead to oversharing in a multi-user environment. Although prior work has studied people's perceptions of information sharing with vendors or ISPs, the sharing of household data among users who interact personally is less well understood. Interpersonal situations make data sharing much more context-based and, thus, more complicated. In this paper, we use themes from the theory of contextual integrity in an online survey (n=1,992) to study how people perceive data sharing with others in smart homes and inform future designs and research. Our results show that data recipients in a smart home can be reduced to three major groups, and data types matter more than device types. We also found that the types of access control desired by users can vary from scenario to scenario. Depending on whom they are sharing data with and about what data, participants expressed varying levels of comfort when presented with different types of access control (e.g., explicit approval versus time-limited access). Taken together, this provides strong evidence that a more dynamic access control system is needed, and we can design it in a more usable way.

6 August 2024 in IEEE Pervasive Computing
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
RMRavindra Mangar
Ravindra Mangar
TPTimothy J. Pierson
Timothy J. Pierson
DKDavid F. Kotz
David F. Kotz
In this article, we outline the challenges associated with the widespread adoption of smart devices in homes. These challenges are primarily driven by scale and device heterogeneity: a home may soon include dozens or hundreds of devices, across many device types, and may include multiple residents and other stakeholders. We develop a framework for reasoning about these challenges based on the deployment, operation, and decommissioning life cycle stages of smart devices within a smart home. We evaluate the challenges in each stage using the well-known CIA triad—Confidentiality, Integrity, and Availability. In addition, we highlight open research questions at each stage. Further, we evaluate solutions from Apple and Google using our framework and find notable shortcomings in these products. Finally, we sketch some preliminary thoughts on a solution for the smart home of the near future.

27 May 2024
Verified
Conference Paper
Open access
CACesar Arguello
Cesar Arguello
BPBeatrice Perez
Beatrice Perez
TPTimothy J. Pierson
Timothy J. Pierson
DKDavid F. Kotz
David F. Kotz