Sarah Nutter

Dr. Sarah Nutter


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

12Years (2015-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
10 May 2016 in Clinical Obesity
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
AAA. S. Alberga
A. S. Alberga
BPB. J. Pickering
B. J. Pickering
KHK. Alix Hayden
K. Alix Hayden
GBG. D. C. Ball
G. D. C. Ball
AEA. Edwards
A. Edwards
SRShelly Russell-Mayhew
Shelly Russell-Mayhew

17 October 2023 in Obesity Reviews
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
SNSarah Nutter
Sarah Nutter
LELaura A. Eggerichs
Laura A. Eggerichs
TNTaniya S. Nagpal
Taniya S. Nagpal
XSXimena Ramos Salas
Ximena Ramos Salas
CCChristine Chin Chea
Christine Chin Chea
SYSaifullah Yusop
Saifullah Yusop
Summary: Weight stigma, defined as pervasive misconceptions and stereotypes associated with higher body weight, is both a social determinant of health and a human rights issue. It is imperative to consider how weight stigma may be impeding health promotion efforts on a global scale. The World Obesity Federation (WOF) convened a global working group of practitioners, researchers, policymakers, youth advocates, and individuals with lived experience of obesity to consider the ways that global obesity narratives may contribute to weight stigma. Specifically, the working group focused on how overall obesity narratives, food and physical activity narratives, and scientific and public‐facing language may contribute to weight stigma. The impact of weight stigma across the lifespan was also considered. Taking a global perspective, nine recommendations resulted from this work for global health research and health promotion efforts that can help to reduce harmful obesity narratives, both inside and outside health contexts.

28 February 2019 in Current Obesity Reports
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
SNSarah Nutter
Sarah Nutter
AIAlana Ireland
Alana Ireland
AAAngela S. Alberga
Angela S. Alberga
IBIsabel Brun
Isabel Brun
DLDanielle Lefebvre
Danielle Lefebvre
SRShelly Russell-Mayhew
Shelly Russell-Mayhew

22 September 2016 in Journal of Obesity
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
SNSarah Nutter
Sarah Nutter
SRShelly Russell-Mayhew
Shelly Russell-Mayhew
AAAngela S. Alberga
Angela S. Alberga
NANancy Arthur
Nancy Arthur
AKAnusha Kassan
Anusha Kassan
EWEmily Williams
Emily Williams
Weight bias is a form of stigma with detrimental effects on the health and wellness of individuals with large bodies. Researchers from various disciplines have recognized weight bias as an important topic for public health and for professional practice. To date, researchers from various areas have approached weight bias from independent perspectives and from differing theoretical orientations. In this paper, we examined the similarities and differences between three perspectives (i.e., weight-centric, non-weight-centric (health-centric), and health at every size) used to understand weight bias and approach weight bias research with regard to (a) language about people with large bodies, (b) theoretical position, (c) identified consequences of weight bias, and (d) identified influences on weight-based social inequity. We suggest that, despite differences, each perspective acknowledges the negative influences that position weight as being within individual control and the negative consequences of weight bias. We call for recognition and discussion of weight bias as a social justice issue in order to change the discourse and professional practices extended towards individuals with large bodies. We advocate for an emphasis on social justice as a uniting framework for interdisciplinary research on weight bias.


1 February 2018 in Canadian Psychology / Psychologie canadienne
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
SNSarah Nutter
Sarah Nutter
SRShelly Russell-Mayhew
Shelly Russell-Mayhew
NANancy Arthur
Nancy Arthur
JEJohn H. Ellard
John H. Ellard