The mutant IDH1 inhibitor ivosidenib improves outcomes for patients with IDH1-mutated cholangiocarcinoma, but resistance inevitably develops. Mechanisms of resistance and strategies to overcome resistance are poorly understood. Here we describe two patients with IDH1 R132C-mutated metastatic cholangiocarcinoma who developed acquired resistance to ivosidenib. After disease progression, one patient developed an oncogenic IDH2 mutation, and the second patient acquired a secondary IDH1 D279N mutation. To characterize the putative IDH1 resistance mutation, cells expressing the double-mutant were generated. In vitro, IDH1 R132H/D279N produces (R)-2HG less efficiently than IDH1 R132H. However, its binding to ivosidenib is impaired and it retains the ability to produce (R)-2HG and promote cellular transformation in the presence of ivosidenib. The irreversible mutant IDH1 inhibitor LY3410738 binds and blocks (R)-2HG production and cellular transformation by IDH1 R132H/D279N. These resistance mechanisms suggest that IDH1-mutated cholangiocarcinomas remain dependent on (R)-2HG even after prolonged ivosidenib treatment. Sequential mutant IDH inhibitor therapy should be explored as a strategy to overcome acquired resistance to mutant IDH inhibitors.

PURPOSE: Circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) analyses allow for postoperative risk stratification in patients with curatively treated colon and breast cancers. Use of ctDNA in esophagogastric cancers (EGC) is less characterized and could identify high-risk patients who have been treated with curative intent. METHODS: In this retrospective analysis of real-world data, ctDNA levels were analyzed in the preoperative, postoperative, and surveillance settings in patients with EGC using a personalized multiplex polymerase chain reaction–based next-generation sequencing assay. Plasma samples (n = 943) from 295 patients at > 70 institutions were collected before surgery, postoperatively, and/or serially during routine clinical follow-up from September 19, 2019, to February 21, 2022. ctDNA detection was annotated to clinicopathologic features and recurrence-free survival. RESULTS: A total of 295 patients with EGC were analyzed, and 212 patients with stages I-III disease were further explored. Pretreatment ctDNA was detected in 96% (23/24) of patients with preoperative time points. Postoperative ctDNA was detected in 23.5% (16/68) of patients with stage I-III EGC within 16 weeks (molecular residual disease window) after surgery without receiving systemic therapy. ctDNA detection at any time point after surgery (hazard ratio [HR], 23.6; 95% CI, 10.2 to 66.0; P < .0001), within the molecular residual disease window (HR, 10.7; 95% CI, 4.3 to 29.3; P < .0001), and during the surveillance period (HR, 17.7; 95% CI, 7.3 to 50.7; P < .0001) was associated with shorter recurrence-free survival. In multivariable analysis, ctDNA status and clinical stage of disease were independently associated with outcomes. CONCLUSION: Using real-world data, we demonstrate that postoperative tumor-informed ctDNA detection in EGC is feasible and allows for enhanced patient risk stratification and prognostication during curative-intent therapy.

Purpose: Transcriptional profiling of pancreatic cancers has defined two main transcriptional subtypes: classical and basal. Initial data suggest shorter survival for patients with basal tumors and differing treatment sensitivity to FOLFIRINOX and gemcitabine plus nab-paclitaxel by transcriptional subtype. Experimental Design: We examined 8,743 patients with RNA sequencing from pancreatic cancers performed at Caris Life Sciences. Classical and basal subtypes were identified using purity independent subtyping algorithm on RNA sequencing, and two cohorts were analyzed: (i) the biomarker cohort included patients with complete molecular profiling data (n = 7,250) and (ii) the outcome cohort included patients with metastatic disease with available survival outcomes (n = 5,335). A total of 3,842 patients were shared between the two cohorts. Kaplan–Meier curves and Cox proportional hazards regression were used to assess patient survival. Results: In the biomarker cohort, 3,063 tumors (42.2%) were strongly classical (SC) and 2,015 tumors (27.8%) were strongly basal (SB). SC and SB tumors showed strong associations with histologic phenotypes and biopsy sites. SB tumors had higher rates of KRAS, TP53, and ARID1A mutations, lower rates of SMAD4 mutation, and transcriptional evidence of epithelial-mesenchymal transition. Sixty of 77 cases (78%) maintained their transcriptional subtype between temporally and/or spatially disparate lesions. In the outcome cohort, the SB subtype was associated with shorter overall survival time, regardless of whether they received FOLFIRINOX or gemcitabine plus nab-paclitaxel as first-line chemotherapy. The mutant KRAS allele type was prognostic of outcomes; however, this impact was restricted to SC tumors, whereas all mutant KRAS alleles had similarly poor outcomes in SB tumors. Conclusions: The SB subtype is a strong independent predictor of worse outcomes, regardless of the up-front chemotherapy regimen used. Clinical trials should further investigate pancreatic cancer transcriptional subtypes as a prognostic and predictive biomarker.

Innate inflammation promotes tumor development, although the role of innate inflammatory cytokines in established human tumors is unclear. Herein, we report clinical and translational results from a phase Ib trial testing whether IL1β blockade in human pancreatic cancer would alleviate myeloid immunosuppression and reveal antitumor T-cell responses to PD1 blockade. Patients with treatment-naïve advanced pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (n = 10) were treated with canakinumab, a high-affinity monoclonal human antiinterleukin-1β (IL1β), the PD1 blocking antibody spartalizumab, and gemcitabine/n(ab)paclitaxel. Analysis of paired peripheral blood from patients in the trial versus patients receiving multiagent chemotherapy showed a modest increase in HLA-DR+CD38+ activated CD8+ T cells and a decrease in circulating monocytic myeloid-derived suppressor cells (MDSC) by flow cytometry for patients in the trial but not in controls. Similarly, we used patient serum to differentiate monocytic MDSCs in vitro and showed that functional inhibition of T-cell proliferation was reduced when using on-treatment serum samples from patients in the trial but not when using serum from patients treated with chemotherapy alone. Within the tumor, we observed few changes in suppressive myeloid-cell populations or activated T cells as assessed by single-cell transcriptional profiling or multiplex immunofluorescence, although increases in CD8+ T cells suggest that improvements in the tumor immune microenvironment might be revealed by a larger study. Overall, the data indicate that exposure to PD1 and IL1β blockade induced a modest reactivation of peripheral CD8+ T cells and decreased circulating monocytic MDSCs; however, these changes did not lead to similarly uniform alterations in the tumor microenvironment.

The aggressive biology of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC), along with its limited sensitivity to many systemic therapies, presents a major challenge in the management of patients with metastatic PDAC. Over the past decade, the incorporation of combinatorial cytotoxic chemotherapy regimens has improved patient outcomes. Despite these advances, resistance to cytotoxic chemotherapy inevitably occurs, and there is a great need for effective therapies. A major focus of research has been to identify molecularly defined subpopulations of patients with PDAC who may benefit from targeted therapies that are matched to their molecular profile. Recent successes include the demonstration of the efficacy of maintenance PARP inhibition in PDAC tumors harboring deleterious BRCA1, BRCA2, and PALB2 alterations. In addition, while therapeutic targeting of KRAS was long thought to be infeasible, emerging data on the efficacy of KRAS G12C inhibitors have increased optimism about next-generation KRAS-directed therapies in PDAC. Meanwhile, KRAS wild-type PDAC encompasses a unique molecular subpopulation of PDAC that is enriched for targetable genetic alterations, such as oncogenic BRAF alterations, mismatch repair deficiency, and FGFR2, ALK, NTRK, ROS1, NRG1, and RET rearrangements. As more molecularly targeted therapies are developed, precision medicine has the potential to revolutionize the treatment of patients with metastatic PDAC.