Control of human cytomegalovirus (HCMV) infection during the posttransplant period was investigated in 134 solid-organ transplant recipients by monitoring in parallel virologic and immunologic parameters for at least 1 year of follow-up. Virologic monitoring was achieved by determining HCMV DNAemia with real-time PCR, using the threshold of 300 000 DNA copies/mL blood as a cutoff for starting preemptive therapy. Immunologic monitoring included measurement of HCMV-specific CD4+ and CD8+ T cells by cytokine flow cytometry, using HCMV-infected dendritic cells as a stimulus. HCMV infection was diagnosed in 110 (82%) and required treatment in 49 (36%) patients. At 12 months after transplantation ‘protective’ immunity (≥0.4 CD4+ and CD8+ HCMV-specific T cells/μL blood) was achieved in 115/129 (89%) patients. During the entire study period, 122 patients reconstituting HCMV-specific CD4+ and CD8+ T-cell immunity at 60 days posttransplant onward were able to control HCMV infection, except for one patient who developed HCMV disease because of a rejection episode. Patients reconstituting HCMV-specific CD8+ only did not control HCMV infection. In conclusion, the presence of both HCMV-specific CD4+ and CD8+ T cells ≥ 0.4/μL blood appears to be protective against HCMV disease. This result does not apply to patients undergoing antirejection treatment, or reconstituting HCMV-specific CD8+ T cells only.

Background. The potential use of T-lymphocyte measurements as infection risk markers after solid organ transplant has not been fully investigated. We analyzed the kinetics of T-lymphocyte subsets within the first 8 months posttransplant and their correlation with opportunistic infections (OIs) in solid organ transplant recipients. Methods. Serial measurement of CD4 and CD8 T cells was performed retrospectively in 48 heart transplant recipients (HTR) and 42 kidney transplant recipients (KTR). Generalized estimating equation models were used to analyze longitudinal data separately for HTR and KTR. Results. An initial CD4 T-cell drop (at months 1 and 2, in HTR and KTR, respectively) coincided with the peak of OIs. HTR with a low nadir CD4 T-cell count (≤200/μL) showed poor CD4 T-cell recovery (175±277 cells/μL at baseline vs 242±99 cells/μL at month 8) and their CD8 T cells increased from 153±194 cells/μL at baseline to 601±399 cells/μL at month 8. KTR with a low nadir CD4 T-cell count (≤200/μL) showed a modest CD4 T-cell recovery (138±46 cells/μL at baseline vs. 440±448 cells/μL at month 8), and their CD8 T cells increased from 90±41 cells/μL at baseline to 450±242 cells/μL at month 8. HTR developing OIs had lower CD4 (P<0.001) and CD8 T cells (P=0.001) than those without infections, whereas in KTR the risk for OIs seemed restricted to patients with low CD8 T cells. HTR with OIs had a low CD4/CD8 T-cell ratio, whereas KTR had a high CD4/CD8 T-cell ratio. Conclusions. Determination of T-lymphocyte subsets is a simple and effective parameter to identify patients at risk of developing OIs.

In allogeneic hematopoietic stem-cell transplantation (HSCT) recipients, outcome of human cytomegalovirus (HCMV) infection results from balance between viral load/replication and pathogen-specific T-cell response. Using a cut-off of 30,000 HCMV DNA copies/ml blood for pre-emptive therapy and cut-offs of 1 and 3 virus-specific CD4⁺ and CD8⁺ T cells/µl blood for T-cell protection, we conducted in 131 young patients a prospective 3-year study aimed at verifying whether achievement of such immunological cut-offs protects from HCMV disease. In the first three months after transplantation, 55/89 (62%) HCMV-seropositive patients had infection and 36/55 (65%) were treated pre-emptively, whereas only 7/42 (17%) HCMV-seronegative patients developed infection and 3/7 (43%) were treated. After 12 months, 76 HCMV-seropositive and 9 HCMV-seronegative patients (cumulative incidence: 90% and 21%, respectively) displayed protective HCMV-specific immunity. Eighty of these 85 (95%) patients showed spontaneous control of HCMV infection without additional treatment. Five patients after reaching protective T-cell levels needed pre-emptive therapy, because they developed graft-versus-host disease (GvHD). HSCT recipients reconstituting protective levels of HCMV-specific T-cells in the absence of GvHD are no longer at risk for HCMV disease, at least within 3 years after transplantation. The decision to treat HCMV infection in young HSCT recipients may be taken by combining virological and immunological findings.

In solid-organ transplant recipients (SOTR) the protective role of human cytomegalovirus (HCMV)-specific CD4⁺, CD8⁺ and γδ T-cells vs. HCMV reactivation requires better definition. The aim of this study was to investigate the relevant role of HCMV-specific CD4⁺, CD8⁺ and γδ T-cells in different clinical presentations during the post-transplant period. Thirty-nine SOTR underwent virologic and immunologic follow-up for about 1 year after transplantation. Viral load was determined by real-time PCR, while immunologic monitoring was performed by measuring HCMV-specific CD4⁺ and CD8⁺ T cells (following stimulation with autologous HCMV-infected dendritic cells) and γδ T-cells by flow cytometry. Seven patients had no infection and 14 had a controlled infection, while both groups maintained CD4⁺ T-cell numbers above the established cut-off (0.4 cell/µL blood). Of the remaining patients, 9 controlled the infection temporarily in the presence of HCMV-specific CD8⁺ only, until CD4⁺ T-cell appearance; while 9 had to be treated preemptively due to a viral load greater than the established cut-off (3×10⁵ DNA copies/mL blood) in the absence of specific CD4⁺ T-cells. Polyfunctional CD8⁺ T-cells as well as Vδ2⁻ γδ T-cells were not associated with control of infection. In conclusion, in the absence of HCMV-specific CD4⁺ T-cells, no long-term protection is conferred to SOTR by either HCMV-specific CD8⁺ T-cells alone or Vδ2⁻ γδ T-cell expansion.

The relative contribution of human cytomegalovirus (HMCV)-specific CD4(+) and CD8(+) T cells to the control of HCMV infection in hematopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT) recipients is still controversial. HCMV reactivation and HCMV-specific CD4(+) and CD8(+) T cell reconstitution were monitored for 1 year in 63 HCMV-seropositive patients receiving HSCT. HCMV reactivation was detected in all but 2 patients. In 20 of 63 (31.7%) patients (group 1) HCMV infection resolved spontaneously, whereas 32 of 63 (50.8%) patients (group 2) controlled the infection after a single short-course of pre-emptive therapy and the remaining 9 (14.3%) patients (group 3) suffered from relapsing episodes of HCMV infection, requiring multiple courses of antiviral therapy. The kinetics and magnitude of HCMV-specific CD8(+) T cell reconstitution were comparable among the 3 groups, but HCMV-specific CD4(+) T cells were lower in number in patients requiring antiviral treatment. HCMV-seronegative donors, as well as unrelated donors (receiving antithymocyte globulin) and acute graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) were associated with both delayed HCMV-specific CD4(+) T cell reconstitution and severity of infection. Conversely, these risk factors had no impact on HCMV-specific CD8(+) T cells. Eight patients with previous GVHD suffered from HCMV gastrointestinal disease, although in the presence of HCMV-specific CD4(+) and CD8(+) systemic immunity and undetectable HCMV DNA in blood. Reconstitution of systemic HCMV-specific CD4(+) T cell immunity is required for control of HCMV reactivation in adult HSCT recipients, but it may not be sufficient to prevent late-onset organ localization in patients with GVHD. HCMV-specific CD8(+) T cells contribute to control of HCMV infection, but only after HCMV-specific CD4(+) T cell reconstitution.