Marco Guzzo

Dr. Marco Guzzo

Otolaryngology and Maxillo Facial Surgery Units, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Tumori, Milan, Italy
orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

34Years (1993-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 May 2010 in Critical Reviews in Oncology/Hematology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
MGMarco Guzzo
Marco Guzzo
LLLaura Locati
Laura Locati
FPFranz J. Prott
Franz J. Prott
Gemma GattaGemma Gatta
Gemma Gatta
MMMark McGurk
Mark McGurk
LLLisa Licitra
Lisa Licitra

15 January 2003 in Journal of Clinical Oncology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
LLLisa Licitra
Lisa Licitra
CGCesare Grandi
Cesare Grandi
MGMarco Guzzo
Marco Guzzo
LMLuigi Mariani
Luigi Mariani
SVSalvatore Lo Vullo
Salvatore Lo Vullo
Giulio Cantu'Giulio Cantu'
Giulio Cantu'
Purpose: Prognosis of patients with advanced oral cavity cancer is worth improving. Chemotherapy has been reported to be especially active in oral cavity tumors. Here we repeat the results of a randomized, multicenter trial enrolling patients with a resectable, stage T2–T4 (> 3 cm), N0–N2, M0 untreated, squamous cell carcinoma of the oral cavity. Patients and Methods: Patients were randomly assigned to three cycles of cisplatin and fluorouracil followed by surgery (chemotherapy arm) or surgery alone (control arm). In both arms, postoperative radiotherapy was reserved to high-risk patients, and surgery was modulated depending on the tumor’s closeness to the mandible. Patients’ accrual was opened in 1989 and closed in 1999. It included 195 patients. Results: In the chemotherapy arm, three toxic deaths were recorded. No significant difference in overall survival was found. Five-year overall survival was, for both arms, 55%. Postoperative radiotherapy was administered in 33% of patients in the chemotherapy arm, versus 46% in the control arm. A mandible resection was performed in 52% of patients in the control arm, versus 31% in the chemotherapy arm. Conclusion: The addition of primary chemotherapy to standard surgery was unable to improve survival. However, in this study, primary chemotherapy seemed to play a role in reducing the number of patients who needed to undergo mandibulectomy and/or radiation therapy. Variations in the criteria used to select patients for these treatment options may make it difficult to generalize these results, but there appears to be room for using preoperative chemotherapy to spare demolitive surgery and/or radiation therapy in patients with advanced, resectable oral cavity cancer.

10 November 2010 in Head & Neck
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
ISIyad Sultan
Iyad Sultan
CRCarlos Rodriguez–Galindo
Carlos Rodriguez–Galindo
SASereen Al‐Sharabati
Sereen Al‐Sharabati
MGMarco Guzzo
Marco Guzzo
MCMichela Casanova
Michela Casanova
AFAndrea Ferrari
Andrea Ferrari

8 January 2014 in Annals of Oncology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
PBPaolo Bossi
Paolo Bossi
SVS. Lo Vullo
S. Lo Vullo
MGMarco Guzzo
Marco Guzzo
LMLuigi Mariani
Luigi Mariani
RGR. Granata
R. Granata
LLL. Licitra
L. Licitra
Data on preoperative chemotherapy in resectable oral cavity cancer are conflicting. We present the long-term results of a randomized trial of induction chemotherapy in resectable oral cavity cancer. A randomized, parallel, multicentre trial evaluated the impact of three cycles of cisplatin 100 mg/m2 and fluorouracil 1000 mg/m2 (120-h infusion administered every 21 days) in stage T2–T4, N0–N2, previously untreated patients with advanced disease. Control group received upfront surgery. Postoperative radiation was offered to both arms when pathologic risk features were identified. The co-primary end points were the occurrence of locoregional or distant tumour relapse, and death. Among the 198 enrolled patients, with a median follow-up of 11.5 years, there was no difference in the incidence of locoregional relapse between chemotherapy and control group (P = 0.6337), nor in distant metastasis development (P = 0.1527). There was also no difference between groups in overall survival (P = 0.3402). Patients with a pathological complete response (pCR) had higher probability of survival than those without (10-year OS: 76.2% versus 41.3%, P = 0.0004). Late toxicities in patients with a minimum follow-up of 60 months (42 in each group) were similar between arms, except from fibrosis (cumulative incidence 40% versus 22% in chemotherapy arm) and grade 2 dysphagia (14% versus 5%). Long-term follow-up of this randomized trial confirmed the absence of survival benefit with preoperative chemotherapy in oral cavity cancer. Late toxicity was similar in the two arms except for fibrosis and dysphagia, which were less in the chemotherapy arm. The survival benefit for patients achieving a pCR was maintained.

1 March 1997 in Head & Neck
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
MGMarco Guzzo
Marco Guzzo
SPSilvana Di Palma
Silvana Di Palma
CGCesare Grandi
Cesare Grandi
RMRoberto Molinari
Roberto Molinari

19 January 2006 in Pediatric Blood & Cancer
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
MGMarco Guzzo
Marco Guzzo
AFAndrea Ferrari
Andrea Ferrari
IMIlaria Marcon
Ilaria Marcon
PCPaola Collini
Paola Collini
LGLorenza Gandola
Lorenza Gandola
GSGabriele Scaramellini
Gabriele Scaramellini