Canine brucellosis caused by Brucella canis, is an infectious disease affecting dogs and wild Canidae. Clinical diagnosis is challenging, and laboratory testing is crucial for a definitive diagnosis. Various serological methods have been described, but their accuracy is uncertain due to limited validation studies. The present study aimed to evaluate the performances of three serological tests for the diagnosis of B. canis in comparison with bacterial isolation (gold standard), in order to establish a protocol for the serological diagnosis of canine brucellosis. A panel of sera from naturally infected dogs (n = 61), from which B. canis was isolated, and uninfected dogs (n = 143), negative for B. canis isolation, were tested using microplate serum agglutination (mSAT), complement fixation performed using the Brucella ovis antigen (B. ovis-CFT), and a commercial immunofluorescence assay (IFAT). The sensitivity and specificity of the three serological methods were, respectively, the following: 96.7% (95% CI 88.8–98.7%) and 92.3 (95% CI 86.7–95.1%) for mSAT; 96.7% (95% CI 88.8–98.7%) and 96.5 (95% CI 92.1–98.2%) for B. ovis-CFT; 98.4% (95% CI 91.3–99.4%) and 99.3 (95% CI 96.2–99.8%) for IFAT. The use in of the three methods in parallel, combined with bacterial isolation and molecular methods, could improve the diagnosis of the infection in dogs.

Four hybridoma cell lines (C4B, 10C2G5, 6C5F4C7, 2D10G11) were adapted to grow in serum-free conditions. Cell proliferation, viability, and antibody production in Nutridoma SP and Ex-Cell HSF 610 media were evaluated and results compared with those obtained using DMEM containing 10% fetal bovine serum (control medium). Clone C4B showed the best IgG productivity in control medium, but viability and number of cells per milliliter were similar for the three media. For clone 10C2G5, the highest values of cell viability were obtained with both control medium and Nutridoma SP; no significant differences in IgG yields and number of cells/mL were observed among the three media. Clone 6C5F4C7 provided no significant differences when grown in the two serum-free media and in control medium. Clone 2D10G11 showed the best IgG productivity in control medium and in Ex-Cell HSF 610, even if Ex-Cell HSF 610 provided the lowest number of cells/mL; no significant differences among the three media were obtained for viability. Purified antibodies produced from each hybridoma cell line grown in serum-free media showed a higher degree of purity than those produced by the same cell lines grown in control medium. Purified MAbs were also titrated by ELISA to test MAb-antigen affinity.