Dongqing Zhao

Mr. Dongqing Zhao

Institute of Geospatial Information, Information Engineering University, Zhengzhou, Henan, China
orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

11Years (2016-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
15 February 2019 in GPS Solutions
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
YTYijun Tian
Yijun Tian
LSLifen Sui
Lifen Sui
GXGuorui XIAO
Guorui XIAO
DZDongqing Zhao
Dongqing Zhao
YTYuan Tian
Yuan Tian

23 January 2023 in Sensors
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
CYChaoyong Yang
Chaoyong Yang
ZCZhenhao Cheng
Zhenhao Cheng
XJXiaoxue Jia
Xiaoxue Jia
LZLetian Zhang
Letian Zhang
Linyang LiLinyang Li
Linyang Li
DZDongqing Zhao
Dongqing Zhao
For positioning tasks of mobile robots in indoor environments, the emerging positioning technique based on visual inertial odometry (VIO) is heavily influenced by light and suffers from cumulative errors, which cannot meet the requirements of long-term navigation and positioning. In contrast, positioning techniques that rely on indoor signal sources such as 5G and geomagnetism can provide drift-free global positioning results, but their overall positioning accuracy is low. In order to obtain higher precision and more reliable positioning, this paper proposes a fused 5G/geomagnetism/VIO indoor localization method. Firstly, the error back propagation neural network (BPNN) model is used to fuse 5G and geomagnetic signals to obtain more reliable global positioning results; secondly, the conversion relationship from VIO local positioning results to the global coordinate system is established through the least squares principle; and finally, a fused 5G/geomagnetism/VIO localization system based on the error state extended Kalman filter (ES-EKF) is constructed. The experimental results show that the 5G/geomagnetism fusion localization method overcomes the problem of low accuracy of single sensor localization and can provide more accurate global localization results. Additionally, after fusing the local and global positioning results, the average positioning error of the mobile robot in the two scenarios is 0.61 m and 0.72 m. Compared with the VINS-mono algorithm, our approach improves the average positioning accuracy in indoor environments by 69.0% and 67.2%, respectively.

1 November 2021 in Advances In Space Research
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
DZDongqing Zhao
Dongqing Zhao
CCCongcong Cai
Congcong Cai
LLLinyang Li
Linyang Li

28 February 2023 in Sensors
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
LLLuguang Lai
Luguang Lai
XMXin Meng
Xin Meng
DZDongqing Zhao
Dongqing Zhao
XLXin Li
Xin Li
WGWenzhuo Guo
Wenzhuo Guo
Linyang LiLinyang Li
Linyang Li
To provide continuous and reliable real−time precise positioning services in challenging environments and poor internet conditions, the real−time precise corrections of the BeiDou global navigation satellite system (BDS−3) PPP−B2b signal are utilized to correct the satellite orbit errors and clock offsets. In addition to this, using the complementary characteristics of the inertial navigation system (INS) and the global navigation satellite system (GNSS), a PPP−B2b/INS tight integration model is established. With observation data collected in an urban environment, the results show that PPP−B2b/INS tight integration can ensure a decimeter−level positioning accuracy; the positioning accuracies of the E, N, and U components are 0.292, 0.115, and 0.155 m, respectively, which can provide a continuous and secure position during short interruptions in the GNSS. However, there is still a gap of about 1 dm compared with the three−dimensional (3D) positioning accuracy obtained from Deutsche GeoForschungsZentrum (GFZ) real−time products, and a gap of about 2 dm compared with the GFZ post−precise products. Using a tactical inertial measurement unit (IMU), the velocimetry accuracies of the tightly integrated PPP−B2b/INS in the E, N, and U components are all about 0.3 cm/s, and the attitude accuracy of yaw is about 0.1 deg, while the pitch and roll show a superior performance of less than 0.01 deg. The accuracies of the velocity and attitude mainly depend on the performance of the IMU in the tight integration mode, and there is no significant difference between using real−time products and post products. The performance of the microelectromechanical system (MEMS) IMU and tactical IMU is also compared, and the positioning, velocimetry, and attitude determinations with the MEMS IMU are significantly worsened.

1 January 2017 in Advances In Space Research
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
YTYijun Tian
Yijun Tian
DZDongqing Zhao
Dongqing Zhao
HCHongzhou Chai
Hongzhou Chai
SWSai Wang
Sai Wang

1 May 2025 in Measurement
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
LLLuguang Lai
Luguang Lai
LLLinyang Li
Linyang Li
HWHaotian Wang
Haotian Wang
JYJunyan Yuan
Junyan Yuan
WFWenzhe Fan
Wenzhe Fan
DZDongqing Zhao
Dongqing Zhao