Stocking density has critical implications for the broiler industry because higher returns can be obtained as the number of birds per unit space increases. Assigned densities have been primarily driven by cost-benefit analysis, but economic profit may come at the cost of reduced bird performance, health, and welfare if densities are excessive. These negative consequences are the primary reason for the increasing demands for guidelines that limit density allowances, even through legislation. Current recommended densities are rather variable, and therefore it is critical if guidelines are to be established that they be based on sound science. Published research consistently indicates that the health and welfare of broilers is compromised if space allowances drop below 0.0625 to 0.07 m2/bird (equivalent to about 34 to 38 kg/m2 depending on final BW). Negative consequences include reduced final BW, feed intake and food conversion, and greater incidence of foot-pad dermatitis, scratches, bruising, poorer feathering, and condemnations. A few studies have also found higher mortalities, tibial dischondroplasia, and some evidence of physiological stress. At the behavioral level, most studies indicate a reduction in space use and movement and higher frequencies of disturbances, which has been linked with a higher frequency of scratches and decline in carcass quality. Other main behavioral categories remain largely unchanged. However, results overwhelmingly suggest that while stocking density has major consequences for the health and welfare of broilers, the quality of the environment, which has been largely underestimated, is far more relevant. Advances in broiler welfare will be difficult to achieve unless some criteria for environmental quality are also established. The implications of this are that the welfare of broilers can be ensured at a range of (reasonable) densities, as long as the requirements for environmental quality are fulfilled. It is also essential for industry to realize that returns per unit of space in broiler production do tend to plateau if density is excessive, a result of the reduction in bird performance. In this paper I suggest a model that may be used to maximize productivity, health, and welfare.

This study attempted to evaluate the effect of various housing densities and perch availability on the immune status of commercial broilers. Birds were raised from hatch to 42 d of age with 10, 15, and 20 birds/m2 in pens, with and without the availability of horizontal perches. The immune parameters that were assessed were lymphoid organ weights, antibody response to SRBC in the last 10 d of growth, heterophil:lymphocyte ratios at 32 and 42 d of age, and lymphocyte blastogenesis of peripheral blood lymphocytes collected at 32 and 42 d of age. As density increased, bursa weight and bursa/body weight ratios decreased significantly (P < 0.05). Addition of perches to the pens also significantly decreased the bursa weights and bursa/body weight index (P < 0.01). No other significant effects were observed for the flock performance, morphometric data, or immunological tests between treatments. We concluded that under the conditions of this study, which tried to simulate commercial conditions, the bursal weight was the best indicator of stress that was related to housing density. Addition of perches appeared to increase this level of stress because the birds used the perches infrequently, and therefore there might have been a further reduction in the availability of floor space to the birds.

Consideration of animal welfare is essential to address the consumers’ demands and for the long term sustainability of commercial poultry. However, assessing welfare in large poultry flocks, to be able to detect potential welfare risks and to control or minimize its impact is difficult. Current developments in technology and mathematical modelling open new possibilities for real-time automatic monitoring of animal welfare and health. New technological innovations potentially adaptable to commercial poultry are appearing, although their practical implementation is still being defined. In this paper, we review the latest technological developments with potential to be applied to poultry welfare, especially for broiler chickens and laying hens. Some of the examples that are presented and discussed include the following: sensors for farm environmental monitoring, movement, or physiological parameters; imaging technologies such as optical flow to detect gait problems and feather pecking; infrared technologies to evaluate birds’ thermoregulatory features and metabolism changes, that may be indicative of welfare, health and management problems. All these technologies have the potential to be implemented at the commercial level to improve birds’ welfare and to optimize flock management, therefore, improving the efficiency of the system in terms of use of resources and, thus, long term sustainability.