Judith Van der Waerden

Dr. Judith Van der Waerden

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

17Years (2010-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 March 2019 in Journal of Affective Disorders
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
ANAurélie Nakamura
Aurélie Nakamura
JWJudith Van der Waerden
Judith Van der Waerden
MMMaria Melchior
Maria Melchior
CBCamille Bolze
Camille Bolze
FEFabienne El-Khoury
Fabienne El-Khoury
LPLaura Pryor
Laura Pryor

1 June 2015 in The Journal of Pediatrics
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
JWJudith Van der Waerden
Judith Van der Waerden
CGCédric Galéra
Cédric Galéra
BLBéatrice Larroque
Béatrice Larroque
MSMarie-Josèphe Saurel-Cubizolles
Marie-Josèphe Saurel-Cubizolles
ASAnne-Laure Sutter-Dallay
Anne-Laure Sutter-Dallay
MMMaria Melchior
Maria Melchior

13 June 2016 in Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
LPLaura Pryor
Laura Pryor
SLSandrine Lioret
Sandrine Lioret
JWJudith Van der Waerden
Judith Van der Waerden
ÉFÉric Fombonne
Éric Fombonne
BFBruno Falissard
Bruno Falissard
MMMaria Melchior
Maria Melchior

25 April 2023 in PLOS Medicine
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
AWAnke Boukje Witteveen
Anke Boukje Witteveen
SYSusanne Y Young
Susanne Y Young
PCPim Cuijpers
Pim Cuijpers
JAJosé Luis Ayuso-Mateos
José Luis Ayuso-Mateos
CBCorrado Barbui
Corrado Barbui
MSMarit Sijbrandij
Marit Sijbrandij
Background: There remains uncertainty about the impact of the Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic on mental health. This umbrella review provides a comprehensive overview of the association between the pandemic and common mental disorders. We qualitatively summarized evidence from reviews with meta-analyses of individual study-data in the general population, healthcare workers, and specific at-risk populations.Methods and findings: A systematic search was carried out in 5 databases for peer-reviewed systematic reviews with meta-analyses of prevalence of depression, anxiety, and post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) symptoms during the pandemic published between December 31, 2019 until August 12, 2022. We identified 123 reviews of which 7 provided standardized mean differences (SMDs) either from longitudinal pre- to during pandemic study-data or from cross-sectional study-data compared to matched pre-pandemic data. Methodological quality rated with the Assessment of Multiple Systematic Reviews checklist scores (AMSTAR 2) instrument was generally low to moderate. Small but significant increases of depression, anxiety, and/or general mental health symptoms were reported in the general population, in people with preexisting physical health conditions, and in children (3 reviews; SMDs ranged from 0.11 to 0.28). Mental health and depression symptoms significantly increased during periods of social restrictions (1 review; SMDs of 0.41 and 0.83, respectively) but anxiety symptoms did not (SMD: 0.26). Increases of depression symptoms were generally larger and longer-lasting during the pandemic (3 reviews; SMDs depression ranged from 0.16 to 0.23) than those of anxiety (2 reviews: SMDs 0.12 and 0.18). Females showed a significantly larger increase in anxiety symptoms than males (1 review: SMD 0.15). In healthcare workers, people with preexisting mental disorders, any patient group, children and adolescents, and in students, no significant differences from pre- to during pandemic were found (2 reviews; SMD’s ranging from −0.16 to 0.48). In 116 reviews pooled cross-sectional prevalence rates of depression, anxiety, and PTSD symptoms ranged from 9% to 48% across populations. Although heterogeneity between studies was high and largely unexplained, assessment tools and cut-offs used, age, sex or gender, and COVID-19 exposure factors were found to be moderators in some reviews. The major limitations are the inability to quantify and explain the high heterogeneity across reviews included and the shortage of within-person data from multiple longitudinal studies.Conclusions: A small but consistent deterioration of mental health and particularly depression during early pandemic and during social restrictions has been found in the general population and in people with chronic somatic disorders. Also, associations between mental health and the pandemic were stronger in females and younger age groups than in others. Explanatory individual-level, COVID-19 exposure, and time-course factors were scarce and showed inconsistencies across reviews. For policy and research, repeated assessments of mental health in population panels including vulnerable individuals are recommended to respond to current and future health crises.

15 February 2017 in PLOS ONE
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
XAXian Abulizi
Xian Abulizi
LPLaura Pryor
Laura Pryor
GMGrégory Michel
Grégory Michel
MMMaria Melchior
Maria Melchior
JWJudith Van der Waerden
Judith Van der Waerden
OGon behalf of The EDEN Mother–Child Cohort Study Group
on behalf of The EDEN Mother–Child Cohort Study Group
Early temperamental characteristics may influence children’s developmental pathways and predict future psychopathology. However, the environmental context may also shape or interact with infant temperament and indirectly contribute to increased vulnerability to adverse developmental outcomes. The aim of the present study is to explore the long-term contribution of temperamental traits at twelve months of age to the presence of emotional and behavioral problems later in childhood, and whether this association varies with the child’s sex, parental separation, family socioeconomic status and maternal depression. 1184 mother-child pairs from the EDEN mother-child birth cohort study based in France (2003–2011), were followed from 24–28 weeks of pregnancy to the child’s fifth birthday. Infant temperament at 12 months was assessed with the Emotionality Activity and Sociability (EAS) questionnaire and behavior at 5.5 years was assessed with the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ). Emotional temperament in infancy predicts children’s overall behavioral scores (β = 1.16, p<0.001), emotional difficulties (β = 0.30, p<0.001), conduct problems (β = 0.51, p<0.001) and symptoms of hyperactivity/inattention (β = 0.31, p = 0.01) at 5.5 years. Infants’ active temperament predicts later conduct problems (β = 0.30, p = 0.02), while shyness predicts later emotional problems (β = 0.22, p = 0.04). The association between the child’s temperament in infancy and later behavior did not vary with children’s own or family characteristics. An emotional temperament in infancy is associated with higher levels of emotional and behavioral difficulties at the age of 5.5 years. Children who show high emotionality early on may require early prevention and intervention efforts to divert possible adverse developmental pathways.

1 July 2015 in European Psychiatry
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
MMM. Melchior
M. Melchior
RHR. Hersi
R. Hersi
JWJudith Van der Waerden
Judith Van der Waerden
BLB. Larroque
B. Larroque
MSM.-J. Saurel-Cubizolles
M.-J. Saurel-Cubizolles
CGC. Galéra
C. Galéra
Background: There is debate as to whether maternal tobacco use in pregnancy is related to offspring behaviour later on. We tested this association examining multiple aspects of children's behaviour at age 5 and accounting for parental smoking outside of pregnancy, as well as child and family characteristics.Methods: Data come from a prospective community based birth cohort study (EDEN; n = 1113 families in France followed since pregnancy in 2003–2005 until the child's 5th birthday). Maternal tobacco use in pregnancy was self-reported. Children's socio-emotional development (emotional symptoms, conduct problems, symptoms of hyperactivity/inattention, peer relationship problems, prosocial behaviour) was assessed by mothers using the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ) at age 5 years. Logistic regression analyses controlled for Inverse Probability Weights (IPW) of maternal tobacco use calculated based on study center, children's characteristics (sex, premature birth, low birth weight, breastfeeding), maternal characteristics (age at the child's birth, psychological difficulties and alcohol use in pregnancy, post-pregnancy depression, and smoking), paternal smoking in and post-pregnancy, parental educational attainment, family income, parental separation, and maternal negative life events.Results: Maternal smoking in pregnancy only predicted children's high symptoms of hyperactivity/inattention (sex and study center-adjusted ORs: maternal smoking in the 1st trimester: 1.95, 95%CI: 1.13–3.38; maternal smoking throughout pregnancy: OR = 2.11, 95%CI: 1.36–3.27). In IPW-controlled regression models, only children of mothers who smoked throughout pregnancy had significantly elevated levels of hyperactivity/inattention (OR = 2.20, 95%CI: 1.21–4.00).Conclusions: Maternal tobacco smoking in pregnancy may contribute directly or through epigenetic mechanisms to children's symptoms of hyperactivity/inattention.