Objective: The aim of this study was to investigate the diagnostic accuracy of a radiomics analysis based on a fully automated segmentation and a simplified and robust MR imaging protocol to provide a comprehensive analysis of the genetic profile and grading of cerebral gliomas for everyday clinical use. Methods: MRI examinations of 217 therapy-naïve patients with cerebral gliomas, each comprising a non-contrast T1-weighted, FLAIR and contrast-enhanced T1-weighted sequence, were included in the study. In addition, clinical and laboratory parameters were incorporated into the analysis. The BraTS 2019 pretrained DeepMedic network was used for automated segmentation. The segmentations generated by DeepMedic were evaluated with 200 manual segmentations with a DICE score of 0.8082 ± 0.1321. Subsequently, the radiomics signatures were utilized to predict the genetic profile of ATRX, IDH1/2, MGMT and 1p19q co-deletion, as well as differentiating low-grade glioma from high-grade glioma. Results: The network provided an AUC (validation/test) for the differentiation between low-grade gliomas vs. high-grade gliomas of 0.981 ± 0.015/0.885 ± 0.02. The best results were achieved for the prediction of the ATRX expression loss with AUCs of 0.979 ± 0.028/0.923 ± 0.045, followed by 0.929 ± 0.042/0.861 ± 0.023 for the prediction of IDH1/2. The prediction of 1p19q and MGMT achieved moderate results, with AUCs of 0.999 ± 0.005/0.711 ± 0.128 for 1p19q and 0.854 ± 0.046/0.742 ± 0.050 for MGMT. Conclusion: This fully automated approach utilizing simplified MR protocols to predict the genetic profile and grading of cerebral gliomas provides an easy and efficient method for non-invasive tumor decoding.

Imaging features for radiomic analyses are commonly calculated from the entire gross tumour volume (GTV${}_{entire}$). However, tumours are biologically complex and the consideration of different tumour regions in radiomic models may lead to an improved outcome prediction. Therefore, we investigated the prognostic value of radiomic analyses based on different tumour sub-volumes using computed tomography imaging of patients with locally advanced head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. The GTV${}_{entire}$ was cropped by different margins to define the rim and the corresponding core sub-volumes of the tumour. Subsequently, the best performing tumour rim sub-volume was extended into surrounding tissue with different margins. Radiomic risk models were developed and validated using a retrospective cohort consisting of 291 patients in one of the six Partner Sites of the German Cancer Consortium Radiation Oncology Group treated between 2005 and 2013. The validation concordance index (C-index) averaged over all applied learning algorithms and feature selection methods using the GTV${}_{entire}$ achieved a moderate prognostic performance for loco-regional tumour control (C-index: 0.61 ± 0.04 (mean ± std)). The models based on the 5 mm tumour rim and on the 3 mm extended rim sub-volume showed higher median performances (C-index: 0.65 ± 0.02 and 0.64 ± 0.05, respectively), while models based on the corresponding tumour core volumes performed less (C-index: 0.59 ± 0.01). The difference in C-index between the 5 mm tumour rim and the corresponding core volume showed a statistical trend (p = 0.10). After additional prospective validation, the consideration of tumour sub-volumes may be a promising way to improve prognostic radiomic risk models.

Background: The aim of the present study is to examine the impact of kV-CBCT-based online adaptive radiation therapy (ART) on dosimetric parameters in comparison to image-guided-radiotherapy (IGRT) in consecutive patients with tumors in the head and neck region from a prospective registry. Methods: The study comprises all consecutive patients with tumors in the head and neck area who were treated with kV-CBCT-based online ART or IGRT-modus at the linear-accelerator ETHOS™. As a measure of effectiveness, the equivalent-uniform-dose was calculated for the CTV (EUD_CTV) and organs-at-risk (EUD_OAR) and normalized to the prescribed dose. As an important determinant for the need of ART the interfractional shifts of anatomic landmarks related to the tongue were analyzed and compared to the intrafractional shifts. The latter determine the performance of the adapted dose distribution on the verification CBCT2 postadaptation. Results: Altogether 59 consecutive patients with tumors in the head-and-neck-area were treated from 01.12.2021 to 31.01.2023. Ten of all 59 patients (10/59; 16.9%) received at least one phase within a treatment course with ART. Of 46 fractions in the adaptive mode, irradiation was conducted in 65.2% of fractions with the adaptive-plan, the scheduled-plan in the remaining. The dispersion of the distributions of EUD_CTV-values from the 46 dose fractions differed significantly between the scheduled and adaptive plans (Ansari-Bradley-Test, p = 0.0158). Thus, the 2.5th percentile of the EUD_CTV-values by the adaptive plans amounted 97.1% (95% CI 96.6–99.5%) and by the scheduled plans 78.1% (95% CI 61.8–88.7%). While the EUD_CTV for the accumulated dose distributions stayed above 95% at PTV-margins of ≥ 3 mm for all 8 analyzed treatment phases the scheduled plans did for margins ≥ 5 mm. The intrafractional anatomic shifts of all 8 measured anatomic landmarks were smaller than the interfractional with overall median values of 8.5 mm and 5.5 mm (p < 0.0001 for five and p < 0.05 for all parameters, pairwise comparisons, signed-rank-test). The EUD_OAR-values for the larynx and the parotid gland were significantly lower for the adaptive compared with the scheduled plans (Wilcoxon-test, p < 0.001). Conclusions: The mobile tongue and tongue base showed considerable interfractional variations. While PTV-margins of 5 mm were sufficient for IGRT, ART showed the potential of decreasing PTV-margins and spare dose to the organs-at-risk.