Ali Haider Ahmad

Dr. Ali Haider Ahmad

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

7Years (2020-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
11 February 2022 in Children
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
VRVamshi R. Revuri
Vamshi R. Revuri
Karen MoodyKaren Moody
Karen Moody
VLValerae O. Lewis
Valerae O. Lewis
RMRodrigo Mejia
Rodrigo Mejia
DHDouglas Harrison
Douglas Harrison
AAAli Haider Ahmad
Ali Haider Ahmad
A paucity of data exists centering on the pain experience of children following hemipelvectomy performed for primary bone and soft tissue sarcomas. In this study, we aimed to describe the incidence, severity, and evolution of perioperative pain and function in pediatric oncology patients undergoing hemipelvectomy, and, additionally, we sought to detail the analgesic regimens used for these patients perioperatively. A retrospective chart review was conducted, studying cancer patients, aged 21 years and under, who underwent hemipelvectomy at MD Anderson Cancer Center (MDACC) from 2018 to 2021. Primary outcomes included the evolution of pain throughout the perioperative course, as well as the route, type, dose, and duration of analgesic regimens. Eight patients were included in the analysis. The mean age at operation was 13 ± 2.93 years. All patients received opioids and acetaminophen. The mean pain scores were highest on post-operative day (POD)0, POD5, and POD 30. The mean opioid use was highest on POD5. A total of 75% of patients were noted to be ambulating after hemipelvectomy. The mean time to ambulation was 5.33 ± 2.94 days. The combination of acetaminophen with opioids, as well as adjunctive regional analgesia, non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, gabapentin, and/or ketamine in select patients, appeared to be an effective analgesic regimen, and functional outcomes were excellent in 75% of patients.

9 December 2022 in Children
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Emily Simon RavEmily Simon Rav
Emily Simon Rav
RSRachna Kalapi Sheth
Rachna Kalapi Sheth
AAAli Haider Ahmad
Ali Haider Ahmad
Pediatric patients with cancer experience significant distress from both treatment and cancer-related pain. Careful selection of an analgesic regimen should be based upon individual patient factors, including the level of pain, response to therapy, and physiologic profile. Refractory pain is a therapeutic dilemma frequently encountered in the pediatric cancer setting. Systemic lidocaine infusions have been described as both safe and efficacious, as prior studies show patients reporting decreased pain scores and improved quality of life after lidocaine treatment. Given the favorable side effect profile of lidocaine, it has the potential to be considered for analgesia in the setting of refractory pain. This review discusses the use of systemic lidocaine infusions for analgesia in pediatric oncology patients with cancer-related pain.

18 April 2022 in Children
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
MGMary Katherine Gardner
Mary Katherine Gardner
PAPatricia J. Amado
Patricia J. Amado
MBMuhummad Usman Baig
Muhummad Usman Baig
SMSana Mohiuddin
Sana Mohiuddin
AHAvis Harden
Avis Harden
AAAli Haider Ahmad
Ali Haider Ahmad
Standardized rounding checklists during multidisciplinary rounds (MDR) can reduce medical errors and decrease length of pediatric intensive care unit (PICU) and hospital stay. We added a standardized process for MDR in our oncologic PICU. Our study was a quality improvement initiative, utilizing a four-stage Plan–Do–Study–Act (PDSA) model to standardize MDR in our PICU over 3 months, from January 2020 to March 2020. We distributed surveys to PICU RNs to assess their understanding regarding communication during MDR. We created a standardized rounding checklist that addressed key elements during MDR. Safety event reports before and after implementation of our initiative were retrospectively reviewed to assess our initiative’s impact on safety events. Our intervention increased standardization of PICU MDR from 0% to 70% over three months, from January 2020 to March 2020. We sustained a rate of zero for CLABSI, CAUTI, and VAP during the 12-month period prior to, during, and post-intervention. Implementation of a standardized rounding checklist may improve closed-loop communication amongst the healthcare team, facilitate dialogue between patients’ families and the healthcare team, and reduce safety events. Additional staffing for resource RNs, who assist with high acuity patients, has also facilitated bedside RN participation in MDR, without interruptions in clinical care.

24 February 2021 in Frontiers in Oncology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
AAAli Haider Ahmad
Ali Haider Ahmad
Kris MahadeoKris Mahadeo
Kris Mahadeo
Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation (HCT) is a potentially curative therapy for children and adolescent/young adults (AYA) with high-risk malignancies as well as some non-malignant genetic diseases. However, HCT may be associated with endotheliopathies and/or organ dysfunction that may progress to pediatric multi-organ dysfunction syndrome (pMODS) and require critical care intervention. Discipline specific scoring systems may be used to characterize individual organ dysfunction, but the extent to which they are used to prospectively monitor HCT patients with mild dysfunction is unknown. Further, separate scoring systems may be used to define risk of mortality and inform prognostication among those who require critical care support. Our understanding of the epidemiology, risk factors, morbidity, mortality, required monitoring, optimal prevention strategies and appropriate management of children undergoing HCT who develop organ dysfunction, endotheliopathies and/or progress to pMODS is poor. Discipline-specific registries and clinical studies have described improving outcomes for children undergoing HCT, including those who require critical care support; however, longitudinal studies/prospective registries that capture common data elements among HCT patients with and without organ dysfunction, endotheliopathies and pMODS are needed to facilitate inter-disciplinary collaboration and optimally characterize the risk profiles, define screening and prophylaxis regimens and mitigate toxicity.

23 October 2024 in Cureus
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
AAAli Haider Ahmad
Ali Haider Ahmad
KHKirstin Henley
Kirstin Henley
JAJessica Asencio
Jessica Asencio
AGAjay Gupta
Ajay Gupta
BTBalagangadhar Totapally
Balagangadhar Totapally
Objectives Metabolic acidosis in children can present with varying degrees of severity, duration, and etiology. A minor illness can lead to hypoglycemia and ketosis in young children due to poor metabolic reserve. We aimed to study the etiology and type of metabolic acidosis, associated electrolyte abnormalities, and mortality rate in children presenting with metabolic acidosis. Methods We performed a retrospective review of young children aged 1-71 months from January 2014 to March 2015 presenting with metabolic acidosis. The demographic data and laboratory values were extracted. We compared the demographic and clinical characteristics of children presenting with metabolic acidosis with and without hypoglycemia. Results The most common diagnoses were acute gastroenteritis (AGE) and vomiting with dehydration. Hypoglycemia was present in 28% of patients, with an overall mortality rate of 2%. Children with acidosis and hypoglycemia tend to be older (42.0 (IQR:20.5-55.5) vs 18.5 (IQR: 7.0-46.3) months; p<0.01), more likely to have diagnoses of vomiting or AGE (67% vs 24%; p<0.01), and have a shorter hospitalization (3 vs 5 days; p<0.05) with no mortality (0% vs 2.6%; p=0.38) compared to children with metabolic acidosis and no hypoglycemia. Conclusions Hypoglycemia is common among children presenting with metabolic acidosis. Hypoglycemia should be considered in young children initially presenting with metabolic acidosis. This will help structure our initial management protocols for the pediatric population.

1 May 2020 in Pediatric Quality & Safety
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
AJAmy H. Jones
Amy H. Jones
JHJulia A. Heneghan
Julia A. Heneghan
BBBonnie Brooks
Bonnie Brooks
MMMia Maamari
Mia Maamari
AAAli Haider Ahmad
Ali Haider Ahmad
CCChristiane Corriveau
Christiane Corriveau
Purpose: Poor documentation and understanding of the limitations of life-sustaining therapies upon admission to the pediatric intensive care unit (PICU) can result in moral distress for both providers and families. Limitations of life-sustaining treatments are often not documented and/or understood by members of the health care team. Methods: We performed a quality improvement initiative to improve the care teams’ understanding and paper documentation of the limitations of life-sustaining therapies in the PICU of a quaternary children’s hospital from January 2018 to March 2019. We implemented a series of plan-do-study-act cycles, including initiation of an updated rounding tool that included limitations of interventions, in-person and electronic information sessions, and implementation of a visual bedside tool to remind providers when limitations were present. Pre- and postintervention surveys were administered. Results: Nursing paper documentation of limitations of life-sustaining therapies increased sequentially from 0% to 88% during plan-do-study-act cycles. Creating a specific area to document limitations on the nursing sheet resulted in the most significant increase in documentation (36.6 points). Nurses reported that they “always” document limitations, which increased from 10% to 38%. The percentage of nurses who understood patients’ intervention limitations increased from 28% to 33%. Conclusions: Limitations of life-sustaining therapies in the PICU are nuanced and involve multiple stakeholders. Nursing education and designation of a section of intervention limitations in nursing daily goal paper documentation can increase comfort with therapeutic limitations in the PICU. Future studies should explore impacts on patient care and serve as a framework for the ultimate goal of improving documentation of care limitations and code status in the electronic medical record.