Julien Maitre

Dr. Julien Maitre

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

17Years (2010-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 December 2010 in Neuroscience Research
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
TPThierry Paillard
Thierry Paillard
VCVincent Chaubet
Vincent Chaubet
JMJulien Maitre
Julien Maitre
MDMichel Dumitrescu
Michel Dumitrescu
LBLiliane Borel
Liliane Borel

1 June 2010 in Neuroscience Letters
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
TPThierry Paillard
Thierry Paillard
JMJulien Maitre
Julien Maitre
VCVincent Chaubet
Vincent Chaubet
LBLiliane Borel
Liliane Borel

17 February 2010 in Neuroscience
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
TPThierry Paillard
Thierry Paillard
EME. Margnes
E. Margnes
JMJulien Maitre
Julien Maitre
VCV. Chaubet
V. Chaubet
YFY. François
Y. François
LBL. Borel
L. Borel

14 September 2016 in PLOS ONE
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
JMJulien Maitre
Julien Maitre
TPThierry Paillard
Thierry Paillard
The purpose of this study was to compare the effects of galvanic vestibular stimulation (GVS) on postural control for participants of different physical activity status (i.e. active and non-active). Two groups of participants were recruited: one group of participants who regularly practised sports activities (active group, n = 17), and one group of participants who did not practise physical and/or sports activities (non-active group, n = 17). They were compared in a reference condition (i.e bipedal stance with eyes open) and four vestibular manipulation condition (i.e. GVS at 0.5 mA and 3 mA, in accordance with two designs) lasting 20 seconds. The centre of foot pressure displacement velocities were compared between the two groups. The main results indicate that the regular practice of sports activities counteracts postural control disruption caused by GVS. The active group demonstrated better postural control than the non-active group when subjected to higher vestibular manipulation. The active group may have developed their ability to reduce the influence of inaccurate vestibular signals. The active participants could identify the relevant sensory input, thought a better central integration, which enables them to switch faster between sensory inputs.

1 January 2013 in Journal of Rehabilitation Research and Development
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
JMJulien Maitre
Julien Maitre
JJJean-Louis Jully
Jean-Louis Jully
YGYannick Gasnier
Yannick Gasnier
TPThierry Paillard
Thierry Paillard
The purpose of this study was to compare the effects of proprioceptive disruption on postural control for participants of different ages according to their physical and/or sport activity levels. Two groups of young and old participants who practiced chronic physical and/or sport activities (young active [n = 17; average age 20.5 +/- 1.1 yr] and old active [n = 17; average age 74.0 +/- 3.8 yr]) and two groups of young and old participants who did not practice physical and/or sport activities (young sedentary [n = 17; average age 20.0 +/- 1.3 yr] and old sedentary [n = 17; average age 74.7 +/- 6.3 yr]) participated in the study. They were compared in a bipedal quiet stance reference condition and a bilateral Achilles tendon vibration condition. Center of foot pressure displacements and frequency analysis were compared between the groups. The results indicated that when proprioceptive information was disrupted, the postural control disturbance was more important for the old sedentary group than for the other groups. There were no differences between the old active group and the young sedentary group. Postural control was less altered for the young active group than for the other groups. Aging decreases the efficiency of postural control regardless of the assessment conditions. Physical and sport activities may compensate for the disturbing effects of proprioceptive perturbation through a better use of sensory information whatever the age of the participants.

18 November 2021 in Symmetry
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
MAMohamed Abdelhafid
Mohamed Abdelhafid
FNFrédéric Noé
Frédéric Noé
JMJulien Maitre
Julien Maitre
Nicola MaffulliNicola Maffulli
Nicola Maffulli
TPThierry Paillard
Thierry Paillard
The current literature shows no consensus regarding the difference between the dominant leg (D-Leg) and the non-dominant leg (ND-Leg) in terms of postural control. This lack of consensus could stem from motor experience (i.e., symmetric or asymmetric motricity) and/or the physiological state induced by physical exercise. This study aimed to investigate the acute effects of fatiguing exercise on postural control when standing on the D-Leg and the ND-Leg, in athletes practicing symmetric (SYM) and asymmetric (ASYM) sports. Thirty healthy male participants were recruited and divided into two groups, (SYM n = 15) and (ASYM n = 15, on the basis of the motricity induced by the sport they practice. Monopedal postural control was assessed for the D-Leg and the ND-Leg before and after the fatigue period (which consisted of repeating squats until exhaustion). A force platform was used to calculate the spatio-temporal characteristics of the displacements of the center of foot pressure (COP). A significant fatigue effect was observed in both groups on the D-Leg and the ND-Leg for all the COP parameters. There was a tendency (p = 0.06) between the ASYM and SYM groups on the D-Leg, concerning the relative increase in the COP velocity in the frontal plane after the fatigue period. The fatigue condition disturbed postural control in both the SYM and ASYM groups on the D-Leg and ND-Leg. This disturbing effect related to fatigue tends to be more marked in athletes practicing asymmetric sports than in athletes practicing symmetric sports on the D-Leg.