Zehui Zhan

Dr. Zehui Zhan

School of Information Technology in Education, South China Normal University, Guangzhou 510631, China
orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

17Years (2010-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications


6 September 2022 in Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
Zehui ZhanZehui Zhan
Zehui Zhan
LHLuyao He
Luyao He
YTYao Tong
Yao Tong
XLXinya Liang
Xinya Liang
SGShihao Guo
Shihao Guo
XLXixin Lan
Xixin Lan

28 November 2022 in Asia Pacific Journal of Innovation and Entrepreneurship
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Zehui ZhanZehui Zhan
Zehui Zhan
WSWenyao Shen
Wenyao Shen
ZXZhichao Xu
Zhichao Xu
SNShijing Niu
Shijing Niu
GYGe You
Ge You
Purpose: This study aims to provide a comprehensive review and bibliometric analysis of the literature in the field of science, technology, engineering and mathematics (STEM) education over the past 15 years, with a specific focus on global distribution and research trends. Design/methodology/approach: This study collected 1,718 documents from the Web of Science (WOS) database and analyzed their timeline distribution, geographical distribution, research topics, subject areas, learning stages and citation burst using a bibliometric approach with VOSviewer and Citespace. Findings: Results indicated that: overall, STEM education has increasingly gained scholarly attention and is developing diversely by emphasizing interdisciplinary, cross-domain and regional collaboration. In terms of global collaboration, a collaborative network with the USA in the center is gradually expanding to a global scope. In terms of research themes, four key topics can be outlined including educational equity, pedagogy, empirical effects and career development. Social, cultural and economic factors influence the way STEM education is implemented across different countries. The developed Western countries highlighted educational equity and disciplinary integration, while the developing countries tend to focus more on pedagogical practices. As for research trends, eastern countries are emphasizing humanistic leadership and cultural integration in STEM education; in terms of teachers’ professional development, teachers’ abilities of interdisciplinary integration, technology adoption and pedagogy application are of the greatest importance. With regards to pedagogy, the main focus is for developing students’ higher-order abilities. In terms of education equity, issues of gender and ethnicity were still the hottest topics, while the unbalanced development of STEM education across regions needs further research. Originality/value: This study provides a global landscape of STEM education along the timeline, which illustrates the yearly progressive development of STEM education and indicates the future trends.

12 August 2022 in Applied Sciences
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
TLTingting Li
Tingting Li
Zehui ZhanZehui Zhan
Zehui Zhan
Design thinking is regarded as an essential way to cultivate 21st century competency and there has been a concomitant rise of needs and interest in introducing K-12 students to design thinking. This study aimed to review high-qualified empirical studies on design thinking integrated learning (DTIL) in K-12 education and explore its future research perspectives. After a systematic search in online database via a keyword search and snowballing approach, 43 SSCI journal papers with 44 studies were included in this review. The results indicate that: (1) There has been a growing popularity of integrating design thinking into K-12 education over the past decade, and most empirical studies target middle school students with small group size and a short period; (2) Studies tend to pay more attention to STEM related curriculum domains by incorporating non-unified design thinking models or processes, and the core concepts of design thinking in K-12 education have been frequently valued and pursued including prototype, ideate, define, test, explore, empathize, evaluate, and optimize; (3) The mostly evaluated learning performances are design thinking, followed by emotional/social aspect, subject learning performance and skill. For evaluation, qualitative assessments are used more frequently with instruments like survey/questionnaire, portfolio, interview, observation, protocol analysis, etc. (4) interventions with non-experimental study, formal classroom setting, collaborative learning, and traditional tools or materials have been mainly applied to the open-ended and challenging activities in real situated DTIL. Overall, the 43 papers suggest that design thinking shows great educational potential in K-12 education, however, the empirical evidence that supports the effectiveness of DTIL is still rather limited. Research gaps and future directions derived from reviewed papers are also discussed.

1 July 2015 in Computers in Human Behavior
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
Zehui ZhanZehui Zhan
Zehui Zhan
Patrick S.W. FongPatrick S.W. Fong
Patrick S.W. Fong
HMHu Mei
Hu Mei
TLTing Liang
Ting Liang