Background: During the Covid-19 pandemic, nurses experienced increased pressure. Consequently, ethical concerns and psychological distress emerged. This study aimed to assess nurses’ ethical conflict, resilience and psychological impact, and compare these variables between nurses who worked in Covid-19 wards and nurses who did not. Methods: Design—Multicentre online survey. Setting—Multi-site public hospital; all nursing staff were invited to participate. The survey included validated tools and a novel instrument to assess ethical conflict. Spearman’s rho coefficient was used to assess correlations between ethical conflict and psychological distress, logistic regressions to evaluate relationships between nurses’ characteristics and outcome variables, and the Mann–Whitney/t-test to compare groups. Results: 548 questionnaires out of 2039 were returned (275 = Covid-19; 273 = non-Covid-19). We found a low–moderate level of ethical conflict (median = 111.5 [76–152]), which emerged mostly for seeing patients dying alone. A moderate and significant positive correlation emerged between ethical conflict and psychological distress rs (546) = 0.453, p < 0.001. Nurses working in Covid-19-ICUs (OR = 7.18; 95%CI = 3.96–13.01; p < 0.001) and Covid-19 wards (OR = 5.85; 95%CI = 3.56–9.6; p < 0.001) showed higher ethical conflict. Resilience was a protective factor for ethical conflict. Conclusions: Ethical conflict was significantly linked to psychological distress, while a higher level of resilience was found to be a protective factor. These results can be informative for nursing management in future similar crises.

Objectives To evaluate the methodological quality of randomised controlled trial (RCT) abstracts in leading critical care nursing journals against the Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials-Abstracts (CONSORT-A) checklist and to identify variables related with abstract reporting quality. Design Descriptive methodological quality review. Data source We searched the PubMed database and the websites of each included journal. Eligibility criteria We included RCT abstracts published between 2011 and 2021 in the first 11 Scopus-ranking (2021) critical care nursing journals that reported the results of RCTs in English that referred to the care of adult patients with acute/critical illness or their relatives and/or caregivers and conducted in ICUs. Data extraction and synthesis Two independent investigators extracted the data using a prespecified 17-item checklist directly derived from CONSORT-A. For the primary outcome, each item was evaluated whether it was adequately reported or not and descriptive statistics were reported. An overall score was calculated by summing the results of all items and multivariate linear regression was conducted to detect potential predictors. Results Seventy-eight RCT abstracts were included in this review. The items with the highest CONSORT-A adherence were authors, objective, conclusion, participants, interventions and outcome. The randomisation item had the lowest CONSORT-A adherence, followed by trial registration, funding source, harms or side effects, recruitment, blinding and outcome results. The average CONSORT-A score was 8.5±1.5 points (of the maximum 17.5 points). Multivariate analysis indicated that the categorised word score and publication date were positively associated with the overall CONSORT-A score, while the first author’s country being in Asia was negatively associated with the overall CONSORT-A score. Conclusions The 78 RCT abstracts showed poor overall adherence to CONSORT-A. The results indicate that the methodological reporting quality of RCT abstracts in critical care nursing journals requires improvement to facilitate assessment of the applicability and relevance of the results reported.

Chest compressions during advanced cardiac life support is a life-saving, potential harmful procedure with high incidence of severe and life-threatening injuries. Previous studies suggest a possible correlation between the increased incidence of chest and/or abdominal trauma and the use of automatic mechanical compression devices. An observational monocentric retrospective cohort study was conducted including all patients admitted to our Intensive Care Unit suffering from out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) in Canton Ticino (Switzerland) from 2012 to 2021. The primary endpoint was to describe any resuscitation-related body injury. The secondary endpoints were to explore possible predictors of cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) related injuries and their association with the 30-day mortality. We included 335 patients, 287 treated with manual chest compressions, 48 mechanically assisted. 55.5% of all resuscitated patients presented severe, or life-threatening lesions. Skeletal and thoracic injuries were the most frequent lesions followed by abdominal injuries. Mechanical assisted resuscitated patients presented higher risk of bleeding (OR 5.9; 95% CI 2.9–11.6) and increased CPR-related injuries (aOR 6.2; 95% CI 2.5–15.4) compared to standard manual chest compressions. In particular higher number of extra-thoracic and life-threatening lesions were described among the mechanical assisted CPR group. Patients with life-threatening had statistically significant higher mortality at 30-days compared to the severe and lesion’s free cohort. Traumatic lesions occurred frequently after chest compression and their severity was associated with increased 30-day mortality. Mechanical devices, compared to manual chest compression, appear to be more harmful and may play a role in causing body lesions and hemorrhagic events.

Serum neurofilament light (sNfL) is a promising marker of outcome after cardiac arrest, but its kinetics are unclear. We prospectively measured sNfL concentrations in 62 patients at 0, 1, 3, 5, 7 and 10 days after cardiac arrest. Survivors and non‐survivors had similar sNfL at admission (14.2 [8.6–21.9] vs. 22.5 [14.2–46.9] pg/mL) but largely different at 24 h (16.4 [10.2–293] vs. 464.3 [151.8–1658.2], respectively). The AUC for sNfL concentrations predicting death was above 0.95 from Day 1 to 10 (highest on Day 3). Late sNfL measurements may exert prognostic value, especially when early samples are unavailable or prognosis remains unclear.

The COVID-19 pandemic is a major public health problem with millions of confirmed cases and deaths described. Nurses are among the health care professionals most involved at the front line, caring for those affected by COVID-19. Patients and families have been subjected to a high emotional burden of fear, anxiety, and uncertainty. The COVID-19 pandemic has had a significant impact on the approach to patients, the organisation of care, and communication with patients and their families, all requiring considerable adaptation on the part of nurses and health care professionals. The overall aim of this research was to find out the needs of patients with COVID-19, the nursing interventions provided and their outcomes, and to explore the experiences of the nurses, patients, and caregivers. A mixed method study will be performed with a convergent design. The study was divided into three phases. Quantitative methods involved nurses and patients affected by COVID-19 with a questionnaire. Qualitative methods involved nurses, patients, and caregivers with interviews and finally a quantitative analysis of the nursing documentation of the interviewed patients. We hope that this study will help us to understand and identify the main nursing and support needs expressed by patients and their families at different stages of their illness.