This page has only limited features, please log in for full access.
Developing prosperous and inclusive societies requires a reformulation of the business-society nexus toward sustainability. This means that all economically motivated behaviors of firms also need to consider their social and environmental impact, and all social and environmental policies their impact on the business sector and the economy. With the Companies Act 2013, the Indian government adopted a legislative approach to reconfigure the business-society nexus. Mandating what has been considered discretionary elicited an extensive academic debate. To study this India-specific political corporate social responsibility (CSR), we employ Content Configuration Analysis on 70 local and international English-language book chapters, research articles, reports, reviews, and expert commentaries published between 2013 and 2019 to develop a typology of the advantages and disadvantages associated with the Companies Act 2013. Among a large number of positions for and against the Act, we find that arguments extolling its advantages concurrently appear as disadvantages in other texts. This paradox is indicative of the difficulties of satisfying stakeholder expectations, as well as the complexities corporate responsibility programs face in India. Nonetheless, CSR as a policy tool allows the Indian government to instrumentalize the growing success of the business sector to address local and national needs and expectations. By systematizing the opportunities and challenges associated with the Companies Act 2013, we show how, similar to China, context and culture influence India’s socioeconomic development trajectory beyond the conventional market economy canon. Our analyses reveal how advantages and disadvantages are frequently connected to multiple stakeholders, including the government, business, and society. We conclude by highlighting the contribution this study makes to the field of political CSR.
Manfred Max Bergman; Zinette Bergman; Yael Teschemacher; Bimal Arora; Divya Jyoti; Rijit Sengupta. Corporate Responsibility in India: Academic Perspectives on the Companies Act 2013. Sustainability 2019, 11, 5939 .
AMA StyleManfred Max Bergman, Zinette Bergman, Yael Teschemacher, Bimal Arora, Divya Jyoti, Rijit Sengupta. Corporate Responsibility in India: Academic Perspectives on the Companies Act 2013. Sustainability. 2019; 11 (21):5939.
Chicago/Turabian StyleManfred Max Bergman; Zinette Bergman; Yael Teschemacher; Bimal Arora; Divya Jyoti; Rijit Sengupta. 2019. "Corporate Responsibility in India: Academic Perspectives on the Companies Act 2013." Sustainability 11, no. 21: 5939.
Purpose The Government of India dramatically altered the dynamic between business and society when it introduced the Companies Act 2013, which mandated firms to expend at least 2 per cent of average net profits on corporate responsibility (CR) programmes. This reconfiguration of social value creation may serve as a template for a closer and participatory relationship between the private sector and government in emerging economies and beyond. This paper aims to analyse how CR expectations have taken shape in the print media in India. Specifically, the authors ask the following: What are the dimensions of CR expectations in mainstream Indian newspapers?, and Why, according to the newspaper narratives, do corporations have these responsibilities? Design/methodology/approach In this qualitative study, the authors randomly selected and analysed 50 per cent (n = 442) of the newspaper articles that dealt explicitly with CR. The articles appeared in the top five Indian English-language newspapers and the top two Hindi-language newspapers between 1 January and 31 December 2015. Using Content Configuration Analysis (CCA), the authors developed a typology of CR expectations and analysed their associated justifications. Finally, they used CCA to analyse how this typology and its justifications connect to the two main stakeholders: the business sector and government. Findings The analyses reveal how the introduction of the Companies Act 2013 had a major impact on CR expectations by explicitly and legally casting the business sector as the engine of social development. The authors were able to describe how contextual and cultural dimensions frame evolving interests and societal demands towards corporations, and how difficult it may be for corporations to fulfil CR expectations that are well beyond their core business and that reach domains usually pertaining to government. Originality/value This study contributes an empirical exploration of media discourse on contemporary CR expectations in India and its associated notions of social value creation, and how these are shaped by various cultural and contextual influences. The authors discuss how this novel approach to CR modifies the relations between business and society, and they reflect on the opportunities and limits of this model for other emerging economies, which struggle to formulate a symbiotic relationship between business and society.
Zinette Bergman; Yael Teschemacher; Bimal Arora; Rijit Sengupta; Klaus Michael Leisinger; Manfred Max Bergman. Developing the business-society nexus through corporate responsibility expectations in India. critical perspectives on international business 2019, 16, 143 -164.
AMA StyleZinette Bergman, Yael Teschemacher, Bimal Arora, Rijit Sengupta, Klaus Michael Leisinger, Manfred Max Bergman. Developing the business-society nexus through corporate responsibility expectations in India. critical perspectives on international business. 2019; 16 (2):143-164.
Chicago/Turabian StyleZinette Bergman; Yael Teschemacher; Bimal Arora; Rijit Sengupta; Klaus Michael Leisinger; Manfred Max Bergman. 2019. "Developing the business-society nexus through corporate responsibility expectations in India." critical perspectives on international business 16, no. 2: 143-164.