Objective: To examine the effectiveness and safety of non-pharmacological interventions to reduce bone loss among post-stroke adult patients. Data sources: Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), Cochrane Database for Systematic Reviews, MEDLINE, CINAHL, ScienceDirect, Scopus, PubMed and PeDRO databases were searched from inception up to 31st August 2021. Methods: A systematic review of randomized controlled trials, experimental studies without randomization and prospective cohort studies with concurrent control of non-pharmacological interventions for adult stroke patients compared with placebo or other stroke care. The review outcomes were bone loss, fall and fracture. The Cochrane Risk of Bias Tools were used to assess methodological quality, and Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluations Framework to assess outcome quality. Synthesis Without Meta-Analysis (SWiM) was used for result synthesis. Results: Seven studies (n = 453) were included. The methodological and outcome qualities varied from low to moderate. There were statistically significant changes between the intervention and parallel/placebo group in bone mineral density, bone mineral content, cortical thickness and bone turnover markers with specific physical and vibration therapies (p<0.05). Falls were higher in the intervention group, but no fracture was reported. Conclusion: There was low to moderate evidence that physical and vibration therapies significantly reduced bone loss in post-stroke patients at the expense of a higher falls rate. The sample size was small, and the interventions were highly heterogeneous with different duration, intensities and frequencies. Despite osteoporosis occurring with ageing and accelerated by stroke, there were no studies on vitamin D or protein supplementation to curb the ongoing loss. Effective, high-quality non-pharmacological intervention to improve post-stroke bone health is required.

The detection of pain in persons with advanced dementia is challenging due to their inability to verbally articulate the pain they are experiencing. Pain Assessment in Advanced Dementia (PAINAD) is an observer-rated pain assessment tool developed based on non-verbal expressions of pain for persons with severe dementia. This study aimed to perform construct validation of PAINAD for pain assessment in persons with severe dementia in Malaysia. This was a prospective cross-sectional study conducted from 27 April 2022 to 28 October 2022 in eight public hospitals in Malaysia. The PAINAD scale was the index test, and the Discomfort Scale—Dementia of the Alzheimer Type (DS-DAT) and Nurse-Reported Pain Scale (NRPS) were the reference tests for construct and concurrent validity assessment. Pain assessment for the study subjects was performed by two raters concurrently at rest and during activity. The PAINAD score was determined by the first rater, whereas the DS-DAT and NRPS were assessed by the second rater, and they were blinded to each other’s findings to prevent bias. PAINAD showed good positive correlations ranging from 0.325 to 0.715 with DS-DAT and NRPS at rest and during activity, with a p-value of <0.05. It also demonstrated statistically significant differences when comparing pain scores at rest and during activity, pre- and post-intervention. In conclusion, the PAINAD scale is a reliable observer-rated pain assessment tool for persons with severe dementia in Malaysia. It is also sensitive to changes in the pain level during activity and at rest, pre- and post-intervention.

Background: Early surgical repair and mobilization postoperatively is associated with improved outcomes for older people with hip fractures. A process mapping exercise was performed to identify the delivery of this aspect of care in a tertiary center. Methods: Analysis was done on electronic health record data of those ≥65 years who had surgery over a 3-month period. Barriers to surgery within 48 h of admission, and mobilized within the day after surgery were identified. Results: Fourty-two patients had surgery where the majority were female, had an average age of 78 years, frail, and multimorbid. 10/42 (23.8%) and 9/42 (21.4%) patients were operated on and mobilized early. Eighteen (42.9%) patients had pre-operative cardiology assessment and 19 patients (45.2%) had pre-operative echocardiogram. None led to a change in the surgical management plan. Other reasons for the delay to early surgery included the need for further medical optimization, financial constraints, blood transfusion, and being on antiplatelet/anticoagulant. Barriers to early mobilization postoperatively were lack of weekend service, delayed referral to therapists, pain, hypotension, anemia, and delirium. Conclusions: Streamlining referrals, agreed clinical pathways, consolidating multidisciplinary involvement, and continuous audit would address the barriers identified in delivering early surgical repair and mobilization post-operatively.