The charge of Task Group 186 (TG‐186) is to provide guidance for early adopters of model‐based dose calculation algorithms (MBDCAs) for brachytherapy (BT) dose calculations to ensure practice uniformity. Contrary to external beam radiotherapy, heterogeneity correction algorithms have only recently been made available to the BT community. Yet, BT dose calculation accuracy is highly dependent on scatter conditions and photoelectric effect cross‐sections relative to water. In specific situations, differences between the current water‐based BT dose calculation formalism (TG‐43) and MBDCAs can lead to differences in calculated doses exceeding a factor of 10. MBDCAs raise three major issues that are not addressed by current guidance documents: (1) MBDCA calculated doses are sensitive to the dose specification medium, resulting in energy‐dependent differences between dose calculated to water in a homogeneous water geometry (TG‐43), dose calculated to the local medium in the heterogeneous medium, and the intermediate scenario of dose calculated to a small volume of water in the heterogeneous medium. (2) MBDCA doses are sensitive to voxel‐by‐voxel interaction cross sections. Neither conventional single‐energy CT nor ICRU/ICRP tissue composition compilations provide useful guidance for the task of assigning interaction cross sections to each voxel. (3) Since each patient‐source‐applicator combination is unique, having reference data for each possible combination to benchmark MBDCAs is an impractical strategy. Hence, a new commissioning process is required. TG‐186 addresses in detail the above issues through the literature review and provides explicit recommendations based on the current state of knowledge. TG‐43‐based dose prescription and dose calculation remain in effect, with MBDCA dose reporting performed in parallel when available. In using MBDCAs, it is recommended that the radiation transport should be performed in the heterogeneous medium and, at minimum, the dose to the local medium be reported along with the TG‐43 calculated doses. Assignments of voxel‐by‐voxel cross sections represent a particular challenge. Electron density information is readily extracted from CT imaging, but cannot be used to distinguish between different materials having the same density. Therefore, a recommendation is made to use a number of standardized materials to maintain uniformity across institutions. Sensitivity analysis shows that this recommendation offers increased accuracy over TG‐43. MBDCA commissioning will share commonalities with current TG‐43‐based systems, but in addition there will be algorithm‐specific tasks. Two levels of commissioning are recommended: reproducing TG‐43 dose parameters and testing the advanced capabilities of MBDCAs. For validation of heterogeneity and scatter conditions, MBDCAs should mimic the 3D dose distributions from reference virtual geometries. Potential changes in BT dose prescriptions and MBDCA limitations are discussed. When data required for full MBDCA implementation are insufficient, interim recommendations are made and potential areas of research are identified. Application of TG‐186 guidance should retain practice uniformity in transitioning from the TG‐43 to the MBDCA approach.

Using symmetric ${}^{112}\mathrm{S}\mathrm{n}+{}^{112}\mathrm{S}\mathrm{n}$, ${}^{124}\mathrm{S}\mathrm{n}+{}^{124}\mathrm{S}\mathrm{n}$ collisions as references, we probe isospin diffusion in peripheral asymmetric ${}^{112}\mathrm{S}\mathrm{n}+{}^{124}\mathrm{S}\mathrm{n}$, ${}^{124}\mathrm{S}\mathrm{n}+{}^{112}\mathrm{S}\mathrm{n}$ systems at an incident energy of $E/A=50\mathrm{M}\mathrm{e}\mathrm{V}$. Isoscaling analyses imply that the quasiprojectile and quasitarget in these collisions do not achieve isospin equilibrium, permitting an assessment of isospin transport rates. We find that comparisons between isospin sensitive experimental and theoretical observables, using suitably chosen scaled ratios, permit investigation of the density dependence of the asymmetry term of the nuclear equation of state. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.92.062701 © 2004 The American Physical Society

Isotopic distributions for light particles and intermediate mass fragments have been measured for ${}^{112}\mathrm{Sn}{+}^{112}\mathrm{Sn}$, ${}^{112}\mathrm{Sn}{+}^{124}\mathrm{Sn}$, ${}^{124}\mathrm{Sn}{+}^{112}\mathrm{Sn}$, and ${}^{124}\mathrm{Sn}{+}^{124}\mathrm{Sn}$ collisions at $E/A=50\mathrm{}\mathrm{MeV}$. Isotope, isotone, and isobar yield ratios are utilized to estimate the isotopic composition of the gas phase at freeze-out. Analyses within the equilibrium limit imply that the gas phase is enriched in neutrons relative to the liquid phase represented by bound nuclei. These observations suggest that neutron diffusion is commensurate with or more rapid than fragment production.

Monte Carlo (MC) dose calculations are performed on patient geometries derived from computed tomography (CT) images. For most available MC codes, the Hounsfield units (HU) in each voxel of a CT image have to be converted into mass density (rho) and material type. This is typically done with a (HU; rho) calibration curve which may lead to mis-assignment of media. In this work, an improved material segmentation using dual-energy CT-based material extraction is presented. For this purpose, the differences in extracted effective atomic numbers Z and the relative electron densities rho(e) of each voxel are used. Dual-energy CT material extraction based on parametrization of the linear attenuation coefficient for 17 tissue-equivalent inserts inside a solid water phantom was done. Scans of the phantom were acquired at 100 kVp and 140 kVp from which Z and rho(e) values of each insert were derived. The mean errors on Z and rho(e) extraction were 2.8% and 1.8%, respectively. Phantom dose calculations were performed for 250 kVp and 18 MV photon beams and an 18 MeV electron beam in the EGSnrc/DOSXYZnrc code. Two material assignments were used: the conventional (HU; rho) and the novel (HU; rho, Z) dual-energy CT tissue segmentation. The dose calculation errors using the conventional tissue segmentation were as high as 17% in a mis-assigned soft bone tissue-equivalent material for the 250 kVp photon beam. Similarly, the errors for the 18 MeV electron beam and the 18 MV photon beam were up to 6% and 3% in some mis-assigned media. The assignment of all tissue-equivalent inserts was accurate using the novel dual-energy CT material assignment. As a result, the dose calculation errors were below 1% in all beam arrangements. Comparable improvement in dose calculation accuracy is expected for human tissues. The dual-energy tissue segmentation offers a significantly higher accuracy compared to the conventional single-energy segmentation.

While scintillation dosimetry has been around for decades, the need for a dosimeter tailored to the reality of modern radiation therapy—in particular a real-time, water-equivalent, energy-independent dosimeter with high spatial resolution—has generated renewed interest in scintillators over the last 10 years. With the advent of at least one commercial plastic scintillation dosimeter and the ever-growing scientific literature on this subject, this topical review is intended to provide the medical physics community with a wide overview of scintillation physics, related optical concepts, and applications of plastic scintillation dosimetry.