Mark A. LaBarge

Dr. Mark A. LaBarge


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

29Years (1998-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications

1 January 2018 in Cell Systems
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
AKAlexandra B. Keenan
Alexandra B. Keenan
SJSherry L. Jenkins
Sherry L. Jenkins
KJKathleen M. Jagodnik
Kathleen M. Jagodnik
SKSimon Koplev
Simon Koplev
EHEdward He
Edward He
APAjay Pillai
Ajay Pillai

9 April 2007 in Journal of Cell Biology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
RVRené Villadsen
René Villadsen
AFAgla J. Fridriksdottir
Agla J. Fridriksdottir
LRLone Rønnov-Jessen
Lone Rønnov-Jessen
Thorarinn GudjonssonThorarinn Gudjonsson
Thorarinn Gudjonsson
FRFritz Rank
Fritz Rank
OPOle W. Petersen
Ole W. Petersen
Cellular pathways that contribute to adult human mammary gland architecture and lineages have not been previously described. In this study, we identify a candidate stem cell niche in ducts and zones containing progenitor cells in lobules. Putative stem cells residing in ducts were essentially quiescent, whereas the progenitor cells in the lobules were more likely to be actively dividing. Cells from ducts and lobules collected under the microscope were functionally characterized by colony formation on tissue culture plastic, mammosphere formation in suspension culture, and morphogenesis in laminin-rich extracellular matrix gels. Staining for the lineage markers keratins K14 and K19 further revealed multipotent cells in the stem cell zone and three lineage-restricted cell types outside this zone. Multiparameter cell sorting and functional characterization with reference to anatomical sites in situ confirmed this pattern. The proposal that the four cell types are indeed constituents of an as of yet undescribed stem cell hierarchy was assessed in long-term cultures in which senescence was bypassed. These findings identify an adult human breast ductal stem cell activity and its earliest descendants.

31 August 2015 in Nature Methods
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
MTMichael E Todhunter
Michael E Todhunter
NJNoel Y Jee
Noel Y Jee
AHAlex J Hughes
Alex J Hughes
MCMaxwell C Coyle
Maxwell C Coyle
ACAlec Cerchiari
Alec Cerchiari
ZGZev J Gartner
Zev J Gartner
DNA-programmed assembly of cells (DPAC) allows the reconstitution of organoid-like structures with controlled size, shape, cell-type composition and spatial heterogeneity. Reconstituting tissues from their cellular building blocks facilitates the modeling of morphogenesis, homeostasis and disease in vitro. Here we describe DNA-programmed assembly of cells (DPAC), a method to reconstitute the multicellular organization of organoid-like tissues having programmed size, shape, composition and spatial heterogeneity. DPAC uses dissociated cells that are chemically functionalized with degradable oligonucleotide 'Velcro', allowing rapid, specific and reversible cell adhesion to other surfaces coated with complementary DNA sequences. DNA-patterned substrates function as removable and adhesive templates, and layer-by-layer DNA-programmed assembly builds arrays of tissues into the third dimension above the template. DNase releases completed arrays of organoid-like microtissues from the template concomitant with full embedding in a variety of extracellular matrix (ECM) gels. DPAC positions subpopulations of cells with single-cell spatial resolution and generates cultures several centimeters long. We used DPAC to explore the impact of ECM composition, heterotypic cell-cell interactions and patterns of signaling heterogeneity on collective cell behaviors.

1 January 2005 in Cancer Cell
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
MBMina J. Bissell
Mina J. Bissell
MLMark A. LaBarge
Mark A. LaBarge
Lest we forget, within every higher organism, there are literally billions of cells with identical genetic information that serve as constituents of the different tissues and organs. Given that genetic information is the same in all cells, including the stem cells, by definition, cells in higher organisms do not possess a sense of place or purpose by themselves. Therefore, in order for each organ to operate successfully within the context of the organism, all cells must be integrated into an architectural and signaling framework such that each cell knows exactly which commands to execute at any given time. Success at this daunting task leads to homeostasis, while failure results in a spectrum of dysfunctions, including cancer. How do organisms achieve this remarkable feat, and how does each cell in return know what to do within the tissues?

1 April 1998 in Immunity
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
YHYasumichi Hitoshi
Yasumichi Hitoshi
JLJames Lorens
James Lorens
SKShin-Ichi Kitada
Shin-Ichi Kitada
JFJoan Fisher
Joan Fisher
MLMark A. LaBarge
Mark A. LaBarge
GNGarry P Nolan
Garry P Nolan
Fas is a surface receptor that can transmit signals for apoptosis. Using retroviral cDNA library-based functional cloning we identified a gene, toso, that blocks Fas-mediated apoptosis. Toso expression was confined to lymphoid cells and was enhanced after cell-specific activation processes in T cells. Toso appeared limited to inhibition of apoptosis mediated by members of the TNF receptor family and was capable of inhibiting T cell self-killing induced by TCR activation processes that up-regulate Fas ligand. We mapped the effect of Toso to inhibition of caspase-8 processing, the most upstream caspase activity in Fas-mediated signaling, potentially through activation of cFLIP. Toso therefore serves as a novel regulator of Fas-mediated apoptosis and may act as a regulator of cell fate in T cells and other hematopoietic lineages.