Rongyu LI

Prof. Dr. Rongyu LI


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

6Years (2021-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
15 November 2023 in Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
YDYi Ding
Yi Ding
JYJun Yuan
Jun Yuan
FMFeixu Mo
Feixu Mo
SWShuai Wu
Shuai Wu
YMYue Ma
Yue Ma
MLMing Li
Ming Li

15 September 2023 in Pesticide Biochemistry and Physiology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
KHKe Hu
Ke Hu
RLRongyu LI
Rongyu LI
FMFeixu Mo
Feixu Mo
YDYi Ding
Yi Ding
AZAiai Zhou
Aiai Zhou
MLMing Li
Ming Li

16 December 2022 in Journal of Fungi
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
AZAi-Ai Zhou
Ai-Ai Zhou
RLRongyu LI
Rongyu LI
FMFei-Xu Mo
Fei-Xu Mo
YDYi Ding
Yi Ding
RLRuo-Tong Li
Ruo-Tong Li
MLMing LI
Ming LI
Background: Natural products are often favored in the study of crop pests and diseases. Previous studies have shown that citronellal has a strong inhibition effect on Magnaporthe oryzae. The objective of this study was to clarify its mechanism of action against M. oryzae. Results: Firstly, the biological activity of citronellal against M. oryzae was determined by direct and indirect methods, and the results show that citronellal had a strong inhibition effect on M. oryzae with EC50 values of 134.00 mg/L and 70.48 μL/L air, respectively. Additionally, a preliminary study on its mechanism of action was studied. After citronellal treatment, electron microscopy revealed that the mycelium became thin and broken; scanning electron microscopy revealed that the mycelium was wrinkled and distorted; and transmission electron microscopy revealed that the mycelium cell wall was invaginated, the mass wall of mycelium was separated, and the organelles were blurred. The mycelium was further stained with CFW, and the nodes were blurred, while the mycelium was almost non-fluorescent after PI staining, and there was no significant difference in the relative conductivity of mycelium. In addition, chitinase was significantly enhanced, and the expression of chitin synthesis-related genes was 17.47-fold upregulated. Finally, we found that the efficacy of citronellal against the rice blast was as high as 82.14% according to indoor efficacy tests. Conclusion: These results indicate that citronellal can affect the synthesis of chitin in M. oryzae and damage its cell wall, thereby inhibiting the growth of mycelium and effectively protecting rice from rice blasts.

29 November 2021 in Journal of Fungi
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
XSXingchen Song
Xingchen Song
QZQijun Zhao
Qijun Zhao
AZAiai Zhou
Aiai Zhou
XWXiaodong Wen
Xiaodong Wen
MLMing LI
Ming LI
TXTengzhi Xu
Tengzhi Xu
The natural product citral has previously been demonstrated to possess antifungal activity against Magnaporthe oryzae. The purpose of this study was to screen and annotate genes that were differentially expressed (DEGs) in M. oryzae after treatment with citral using RNA sequencing (RNA-seq). Thereafter, samples were reprepared for quantitative real-time PCR (RT-qPCR) analysis verification of RNA-seq data. The results showed that 649 DEGs in M. oryzae were significantly affected after treatment with citral (100 μg/mL) for 24 h. Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) and a gene ontology (GO) analysis showed that DEGs were mainly enriched in amino sugar and nucleotide sugar metabolic pathways, including the chitin synthesis pathway and UDP sugar synthesis pathway. The results of the RT-qPCR analysis also showed that the chitin present in M. oryzae might be degraded to chitosan, chitobiose, N-acetyl-D-glucosamine, and β-D-fructose-6-phosphate following treatment with citral. Chitin degradation was indicated by damaged cell-wall integrity. Moreover, the UDP glucose synthesis pathway was involved in glycolysis and gluconeogenesis, providing precursors for the synthesis of polysaccharides. Galactose-1-phosphate uridylyltransferase, which is involved in the regulation of UDP-α-D-galactose and α-D-galactose-1-phosphate, was downregulated. This would result in the inhibition of UDP glucose (UDP-Glc) synthesis, a reduction in cell-wall glucan content, and the destruction of cell-wall integrity.

Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
SWShuai Wu
Shuai Wu
MHMinrong He
Minrong He
FXFujin Xia
Fujin Xia
XZXueyi Zhao
Xueyi Zhao
XLXun Liao
Xun Liao
MLMing LI
Ming LI
Acetamiprid is widely used in paddy fields for controlling Nilaparvata lugens (Stål). However, the risk of resistance development, the cross-resistance pattern and the resistance mechanism of acetamiprid in this pest remain unclear. In this study, an acetamiprid-resistant strain (AC-R) was originated from a field strain (UNSEL) through successive selection with acetamiprid for 30 generations, which reached 60.0-fold resistance when compared with a laboratory susceptible strain (AC-S). The AC-R strain (G30) exhibited cross-resistance to thiamethoxam (25.6-fold), nitenpyram (21.4-fold), imidacloprid (14.6-fold), cycloxaprid (11.8-fold), dinotefuran (8.7-fold), sulfoxaflor (7.6-fold) and isoprocarb (8.22-fold), while there was no cross-resistance to etofenprox, buprofezin and chlorpyrifos. Acetamiprid was synergized by the inhibitor piperonyl butoxide (2.2-fold) and the activity of cytochrome P450 monooxygenase was significantly higher in the AC-R strain compared with the AC-S strain, suggesting the critical role of P450. The gene expression results showed that the P450 gene CYP6ER1 was significantly overexpressed in AC-R compared with the AC-S and UNSEL strains. In addition, the RNA interference (RNAi) of CYP6ER1 significantly increased the susceptibility of AC-R to acetamiprid. Molecular docking predicted that acetamiprid and CYP6ER1 had close binding sites, and the nitrogen atoms had hydrogen bond interactions with CYP6ER1. These results demonstrated that the overexpression of CYP6ER1 contributed to acetamiprid resistance in N. lugens.

27 February 2024 in Pest Management Science
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
YDYi Ding
Yi Ding
JYJun Yuan
Jun Yuan
SWShuai Wu
Shuai Wu
KHKe Hu
Ke Hu
YMYue Ma
Yue Ma
RLRongyu LI
Rongyu LI