Simon Raphael Lode Feys

Dr. Simon Raphael Lode Feys

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

6Years (2021-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
13 June 2024 in Clinical Microbiology Reviews
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
MHMartin Hoenigl
Martin Hoenigl
AAAmir Arastehfar
Amir Arastehfar
Maiken ArendrupMaiken Arendrup
Maiken Arendrup
RBRoger Brüggemann
Roger Brüggemann
ACAgostinho Carvalho
Agostinho Carvalho
George ThompsonGeorge Thompson
George Thompson
SUMMARY: Fungal infections are on the rise, driven by a growing population at risk and climate change. Currently available antifungals include only five classes, and their utility and efficacy in antifungal treatment are limited by one or more of innate or acquired resistance in some fungi, poor penetration into “sequestered” sites, and agent-specific side effect which require frequent patient reassessment and monitoring. Agents with novel mechanisms, favorable pharmacokinetic (PK) profiles including good oral bioavailability, and fungicidal mechanism(s) are urgently needed. Here, we provide a comprehensive review of novel antifungal agents, with both improved known mechanisms of actions and new antifungal classes, currently in clinical development for treating invasive yeast, mold (filamentous fungi), Pneumocystis jirovecii infections, and dimorphic fungi (endemic mycoses). We further focus on inhaled antifungals and the role of immunotherapy in tackling fungal infections, and the specific PK/pharmacodynamic profiles, tissue distributions as well as drug-drug interactions of novel antifungals. Finally, we review antifungal resistance mechanisms, the role of use of antifungal pesticides in agriculture as drivers of drug resistance, and detail detection methods for antifungal resistance.

15 July 2024 in The Lancet Respiratory Medicine
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
SFSimon Raphael Lode Feys
Simon Raphael Lode Feys
ACAgostinho Carvalho
Agostinho Carvalho
CCCornelius J Clancy
Cornelius J Clancy
JGJean-Pierre Gangneux
Jean-Pierre Gangneux
MHMartin Hoenigl
Martin Hoenigl
JWJoost Wauters
Joost Wauters

16 September 2022 in Journal of Experimental Medicine
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
QZQian Zhang
Qian Zhang
MPMario Andrés Pizzorno
Mario Andrés Pizzorno
LMLisa Miorin
Lisa Miorin
PBPaul Bastard
Paul Bastard
AGAdrian Gervais
Adrian Gervais
JCJean-Laurent Casanova
Jean-Laurent Casanova
Autoantibodies neutralizing type I interferons (IFNs) can underlie critical COVID-19 pneumonia and yellow fever vaccine disease. We report here on 13 patients harboring autoantibodies neutralizing IFN-α2 alone (five patients) or with IFN-ω (eight patients) from a cohort of 279 patients (4.7%) aged 6–73 yr with critical influenza pneumonia. Nine and four patients had antibodies neutralizing high and low concentrations, respectively, of IFN-α2, and six and two patients had antibodies neutralizing high and low concentrations, respectively, of IFN-ω. The patients’ autoantibodies increased influenza A virus replication in both A549 cells and reconstituted human airway epithelia. The prevalence of these antibodies was significantly higher than that in the general population for patients 70 yr of age (3.1 vs. 4.4%, P = 0.68). The risk of critical influenza was highest in patients with antibodies neutralizing high concentrations of both IFN-α2 and IFN-ω (OR = 11.7, P = 1.3 × 10−5), especially those <70 yr old (OR = 139.9, P = 3.1 × 10−10). We also identified 10 patients in additional influenza patient cohorts. Autoantibodies neutralizing type I IFNs account for ∼5% of cases of life-threatening influenza pneumonia in patients <70 yr old.

11 December 2021 in Journal of Fungi
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
SFSimon Raphael Lode Feys
Simon Raphael Lode Feys
MAMaria Panagiota Almyroudi
Maria Panagiota Almyroudi
RBReinout Braspenning
Reinout Braspenning
Katrien LagrouKatrien Lagrou
Katrien Lagrou
ISIsabel Spriet
Isabel Spriet
JWJoost Wauters
Joost Wauters
Coronavirus disease 19 (COVID-19)-associated pulmonary aspergillosis (CAPA) is a severe fungal infection complicating critically ill COVID-19 patients. Numerous retrospective and prospective studies have been performed to get a better grasp on this lethal co-infection. We performed a qualitative review and summarized data from 48 studies in which 7047 patients had been included, of whom 820 had CAPA. The pooled incidence of proven, probable or putative CAPA was 15.1% among 2953 ICU-admitted COVID-19 patients included in 18 prospective studies. Incidences showed great variability due to multiple factors such as discrepancies in the rate and depth of the fungal work-up. The pathophysiology and risk factors for CAPA are ill-defined, but therapy with corticosteroids and anti-interleukin-6 therapy potentially confer the biggest risk. Sampling for mycological work-up using bronchoscopy is the cornerstone for diagnosis, as imaging is often aspecific. CAPA is associated with an increased mortality, but we do not have conclusive data whether therapy contributes to an increased survival in these patients. We conclude our review with a comparison between influenza-associated pulmonary aspergillosis (IAPA) and CAPA.

29 May 2021 in Intensive Care Medicine
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
LVLore Vanderbeke
Lore Vanderbeke
Nico JanssenNico Janssen
Nico Janssen
DBDennis Bergmans
Dennis Bergmans
MBMarc Bourgeois
Marc Bourgeois
JBJochem Buil
Jochem Buil
TWTom Wolfs
Tom Wolfs

26 April 2023 in Mycopathologia
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
JBJohannes Boyer
Johannes Boyer
SFSimon Raphael Lode Feys
Simon Raphael Lode Feys
IZIsabella Zsifkovits
Isabella Zsifkovits
MHMartin Hoenigl
Martin Hoenigl
MEMatthias Egger
Matthias Egger
Despite improvements in treatment and diagnostics over the last two decades, invasive aspergillosis (IA) remains a devastating fungal disease. The number of immunocompromised patients and hence vulnerable hosts increases, which is paralleled by the emergence of a rise in IA cases. Increased frequencies of azole-resistant strains are reported from six continents, presenting a new challenge for the therapeutic management. Treatment options for IA currently consist of three classes of antifungals (azoles, polyenes, echinocandins) with distinctive advantages and shortcomings. Especially in settings of difficult to treat IA, comprising drug tolerance/resistance, limiting drug–drug interactions, and/or severe underlying organ dysfunction, novel approaches are urgently needed. Promising new drugs for the treatment of IA are in late-stage clinical development, including olorofim (a dihydroorotate dehydrogenase inhibitor), fosmanogepix (a Gwt1 enzyme inhibitor), ibrexafungerp (a triterpenoid), opelconazole (an azole optimized for inhalation) and rezafungin (an echinocandin with long half-life time). Further, new insights in the pathophysiology of IA yielding immunotherapy as a potential add-on therapy. Current investigations show encouraging results, so far mostly in preclinical settings. In this review we discuss current treatment strategies, give an outlook on possible new pharmaceutical therapeutic options, and, lastly, provide an overview of the ongoing research in immunotherapy for IA.