Jan Engelmann

Dr. Jan Engelmann

1. Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University Medical Center Mainz, Untere Zahlbacher Str. 8, D-55131 Mainz, Germany
+1

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

10Years (2017-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 November 2017 in Journal of Psychiatric Research
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
SWStefanie Wagner
Stefanie Wagner
AEAlice Engel
Alice Engel
JEJan Engelmann
Jan Engelmann
DHDavid P Herzog
David P Herzog
NDNadine Dreimüller
Nadine Dreimüller
KLKlaus Lieb
Klaus Lieb

7 July 2022 in Translational Psychiatry
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
JEJan Engelmann
Jan Engelmann
LZLea Zillich
Lea Zillich
JFJosef Frank
Josef Frank
SWS. Wagner
S. Wagner
MCM. Cetin
M. Cetin
FSFabian . Streit
Fabian . Streit
Although the currently available antidepressants are well established in the treatment of the major depressive disorder (MDD), there is strong variability in the response of individual patients. Reliable predictors to guide treatment decisions before or in an early stage of treatment are needed. DNA-methylation has been proven a useful biomarker in different clinical conditions, but its importance for mechanisms of antidepressant response has not yet been determined. 80 MDD patients were selected out of >500 participants from the Early Medication Change (EMC) cohort with available genetic material based on their antidepressant response after four weeks and stratified into clear responders and age- and sex-matched non-responders (N = 40, each). Early improvement after two weeks was analyzed as a secondary outcome. DNA-methylation was determined using the Illumina EPIC BeadChip. Epigenome-wide association studies were performed and differentially methylated regions (DMRs) identified using the comb-p algorithm. Enrichment was tested for hallmark gene-sets and in genome-wide association studies of depression and antidepressant response. No epigenome-wide significant differentially methylated positions were found for treatment response or early improvement. Twenty DMRs were associated with response; the strongest in an enhancer region in SORBS2, which has been related to cardiovascular diseases and type II diabetes. Another DMR was located in CYP2C18, a gene previously linked to antidepressant response. Results pointed towards differential methylation in genes associated with cardiac function, neuroticism, and depression. Linking differential methylation to antidepressant treatment response is an emerging topic and represents a step towards personalized medicine, potentially facilitating the prediction of patients’ response before treatment.

6 August 2021 in Metabolites
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
MLMoritz Losacker
Moritz Losacker
MKMichael Kraemer
Michael Kraemer
APAlexandra Philipsen
Alexandra Philipsen
KDKristina Duecker
Kristina Duecker
NDNadine Dreimueller
Nadine Dreimueller
CHCornelius Hess
Cornelius Hess
In forensic toxicology, amphetamine intoxications represent one of the most common case groups and present difficult questions for toxicologists. Estimating the time of consumption and the current influence of the stimulant is particularly difficult when only total amphetamine concentrations are considered. Stereoselective analysis and the consideration of metabolites can provide valuable information to facilitate interpretation. An enantioselective liquid chromatography−tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) method for detection of amphetamine, norephedrine and 4-hydroxyamphetamine was developed. Validation showed satisfactory selectivity, sensitivity, linearity (0.5–250 ng/mL), precision and accuracy for all enantiomers. The method was applied to a collective of 425 forensic serum samples and 30 serum samples from psychiatric inpatients stating their last time of amphetamine consumption. Norephedrine and 4-hydroxyamphetamine were detected more frequently at higher amphetamine concentrations and at lower amphetamine (R)/(S) concentration ratios, possibly indicating recent consumption. Mean (R)/(S) ratio of amphetamine was 1.14, whereas higher ratios (mean 1.36) were found for amphetamine concentrations below 100 ng/mL. The (R)/(S) ratios of psychiatric inpatients significantly correlated with the reported time intervals to last consumption. The use of amphetamine (R)/(S) ratios and the simultaneous detection of metabolites are promising factors that can facilitate estimation of consumption time and current impairment.

30 March 2019 in European Archives of Psychiatry and Clinical Neuroscience
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
JEJan Engelmann
Jan Engelmann
SWStefanie Wagner
Stefanie Wagner
DWDaniel Wollschläger
Daniel Wollschläger
SKSabine Kaaden
Sabine Kaaden
KSKonrad F. Schlicht
Konrad F. Schlicht
KLKlaus Lieb
Klaus Lieb

25 January 2022 in The World Journal of Biological Psychiatry
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
JEJan Engelmann
Jan Engelmann
HMHarald Murck
Harald Murck
SWStefanie Wagner
Stefanie Wagner
LZLea Zillich
Lea Zillich
FSFabian Streit
Fabian Streit
MMMarianne B. Műller
Marianne B. Műller
Previous studies indicated a relationship between aldosterone, the mineralocorticoid receptor (MR), and antidepressant treatment outcome. Physiological indicators of MR function (blood pressure and...

20 July 2024 in Journal of Affective Disorders
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
SMSvenja Müller
Svenja Müller
KLKlaus Lieb
Klaus Lieb
FSFabian Streit
Fabian Streit
SASwapnil Awasthi
Swapnil Awasthi
SWStefanie Wagner
Stefanie Wagner
JEJan Engelmann
Jan Engelmann
Given the great interest in identifying reliable predictors of the response to antidepressant drugs, the present study investigated whether polygenic scores (PGS) for Major Depressive Disorder (MDD) and antidepressant treatment response (ADR) were related to the complex trait of antidepressant response in the Early Medication Change (EMC) cohort. In this secondary analysis of the EMC trial (N = 889), 481 MDD patients were included and compared to controls from a population-based cohort. Patients were treated over eight weeks within a pre-defined treatment-algorithm. We investigated patients' genetic variation associated with MDD and ADR, using PGS and examined the association of PGS with treatment outcomes (early improvement, response, remission). Additionally, the influence of two cytochrome P450 drug-metabolizing enzymes (CYP2C19, CYP2D6) was determined. PGS for MDD was significantly associated with disorder status (NkR2 = 2.48 %, p < 1*10-12), with higher genetic burden in EMC patients compared to controls. The PGS for ADR did not explain remission status. The PGS for MDD and ADR were also not associated with treatment outcomes. In addition, there were no effects of common CYP450 gene variants on ADR. The study was limited by variability in the outcome parameters due to differences in treatment and insufficient sample size in the used ADR genome-wide association study (GWAS). The present study confirms a polygenic contribution to MDD burden in the EMC patients. Larger GWAS with homogeneity in antidepressant treatments are needed to explore the genetic variation associated with ADR and realize the potential of PGS to contribute to specific response subtypes.